Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.x/26/
2 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsChaosMonkeyNothingIsSafeTest.test
Error Message:
Timeout occured while waiting response from server at:
http://127.0.0.1:55582/collection1
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219346#comment-15219346
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7148:
--
FWIW I've done this years ago to implement search with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-8925:
-
Description: As SOLR- is close to wrapping up, we can use the same
parallel join approach to
Joel Bernstein created SOLR-8925:
Summary: Add VerticesStream to support vertex iteration
Key: SOLR-8925
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8925
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New
That was an excellent summary Rob; thanks.
Minor nit: BBoxSpatialStrategy isn't/wasn't deprecated. It was enhanced to
use PointValues.
I too would like to see the legacy numerics stay in "backwards-codecs" as
you describe with precisionStep specified on the Analyzer.
I disagree with Shawn about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219286#comment-15219286
]
Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-8914:
--
Zero failures on second 100 iterations.
> ZkStateReader's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219235#comment-15219235
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-8922:
--
I'm also wondering if there are some tricks where we could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219229#comment-15219229
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-8875:
This code is new to me but what you say resonates with me. I also
Joel Bernstein created SOLR-8924:
Summary: RollupStream breaks with null values in the group by
buckets
Key: SOLR-8924
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8924
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219210#comment-15219210
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-8812:
--
Thanks to you both for jumping in here. I'll see what I can do
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> I think marking the legacy fields/queries as deprecated in Lucene in 6.0 is
> the right thing to do in order to encourage users to migrate to the new
> points API. If Solr needs to keep them around for 7.x,
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux/303/
Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+111-patched -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
-XX:-CompactStrings
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 12304 lines...]
[junit4] JVM J2: stdout was not empty, see:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Solaris/44/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.solr.cloud.overseer.ZkStateReaderTest.testStateFormatUpdateWithExplicitRefreshLazy
Error Message:
Could not find collection : c1
Stack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219154#comment-15219154
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-8914:
--
Nope, completely re-did the test and got another failure on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219133#comment-15219133
]
Greg Pendlebury commented on SOLR-8812:
---
Thanks. Hopefully that is ok. I just installed git and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219119#comment-15219119
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-8914:
--
I had 4/100 iterations fail. Let me try it all again to insure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219120#comment-15219120
]
Ryan Steinberg commented on SOLR-8812:
--
I tested explicitly setting mm to 0 and all of my tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219107#comment-15219107
]
Ryan Ernst commented on LUCENE-6938:
It looks like the branch detection logic isn't working given our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219098#comment-15219098
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-7096:
-
Ishan, I don't think it really impacts solr honestly. The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219086#comment-15219086
]
Greg Pendlebury commented on SOLR-8812:
---
I am happy to take a look at any issues, since I was
Mike Drob created SOLR-8923:
---
Summary: HttpSolrCall assumes request was a GET when processing
errors
Key: SOLR-8923
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8923
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
Adrien, sure, Solr could take ownership of the so-called legacy (trie)
numerics, but then what would Elasticsearch do for its users when ES
upgrades to Lucene 7.0 which would then no longer have the code to handle
existing Trie-based indexes? Would ES then start depending on Solr?! Or is
ES
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219073#comment-15219073
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7094:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219066#comment-15219066
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8922:
---
Not yet. The major risk area would be the new ExpandingIntArray
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219063#comment-15219063
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-7096:
-
exactly. I looked at this and I think its too trappy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219059#comment-15219059
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7094:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219045#comment-15219045
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7094:
-
Commit
Le mer. 30 mars 2016 à 22:56, Shawn Heisey a écrit :
> These are the choices I see to address the problem, in decreasing order
> of personal preference:
>
> 1) Revert LUCENE-6917 in the 6.x versions, move the deprecation to master.
> 2) Delay the Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 release so
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux/302/
Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+111-patched -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC
-XX:-CompactStrings
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 12394 lines...]
[junit4] JVM J0: stdout was not empty, see:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15219003#comment-15219003
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-8922:
--
Jeff:
Thanks for pointing that out, we need to keep from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hrishikesh Gadre resolved SOLR-8901.
Resolution: Duplicate
> Export data/tlog directory locations for every core in clusterstate
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-master/973/
5 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.test
Error Message:
distrib-dup-test-chain-explicit: doc#8 has wrong value for regex_dup_B_s
expected: but was:
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218995#comment-15218995
]
Shawn Heisey commented on LUCENE-6938:
--
Apologies for the incorrect credit.
I've never done it, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218993#comment-15218993
]
Hrishikesh Gadre commented on SOLR-5750:
[~varunthacker] Is there a reason why we have introduced a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218974#comment-15218974
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8922:
---
For my index, (86M-doc shards and a per-shard 99.9th percentile
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-8922:
--
Attachment: SOLR-8922.patch
This is essentially the same patch as in SOLR-5444, but applies cleanly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218949#comment-15218949
]
Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-8914:
--
With the full patch 0/100 iterations failed. I'll beast another 100
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218913#comment-15218913
]
Jan Høydahl commented on LUCENE-6938:
-
It was I who cherry-picked Mike's fix to the 5_5 branch, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218910#comment-15218910
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8922:
---
SOLR-5444 had a patch to help with this,
Jeff Wartes created SOLR-8922:
-
Summary: DocSetCollector can allocate massive garbage on large
indexes
Key: SOLR-8922
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8922
Project: Solr
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218895#comment-15218895
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7094:
--
Great; who shall commit? I will tonight (~4 more hours) if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218894#comment-15218894
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-8812:
---
Perhaps, after reverting, we could spend some effort adding better
Does Solr need its own MIGRATE.txt file? Maybe not for 6.0, but probably
for 6.x when any Solr field type changes occur.
Right now, MIGRATE.txt belongs to the lucene package:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/branch_6_0/lucene/MIGRATE.txt
The migration comments related to numeric fields
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218875#comment-15218875
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7152:
--
-1 sorry. I've been following LUCENE-7150 and it's unclear
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218854#comment-15218854
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-7362:
Try running from within IntelliJ maybe? It's more reproducible
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218651#comment-15218651
]
Marius Grama edited comment on SOLR-8851 at 3/30/16 8:57 PM:
-
Issue can be
On 3/30/2016 10:43 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> I think marking the legacy fields/queries as deprecated in Lucene in
> 6.0 is the right thing to do in order to encourage users to migrate to
> the new points API. If Solr needs to keep them around for 7.x, it
> would be fine to move them to solr/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218651#comment-15218651
]
Marius Grama edited comment on SOLR-8851 at 3/30/16 8:55 PM:
-
Issue can be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218797#comment-15218797
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-7096:
---
Users must enable DocValues for facetting or sorting. As
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218802#comment-15218802
]
Karl Wright commented on LUCENE-7150:
-
If they are 2D linear interpolations, then it is not
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX/3177/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.test
Error Message:
Error from server at http://127.0.0.1:62265/collection1: Async exception during
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218790#comment-15218790
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7150:
I would assume they are a 2D interpolation?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218778#comment-15218778
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya edited comment on LUCENE-7096 at 3/30/16 8:24 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218778#comment-15218778
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on LUCENE-7096:
--
bq. Maybe we should revert the single-valued
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218757#comment-15218757
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-8396:
I'm assuming weeks. There are some issues that we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218737#comment-15218737
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-7362:
--
I just beasted it with the same seed fr 15 iters and it is not failing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218717#comment-15218717
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-8396:
I'm curious -- what kind of timeframe would be required to create
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218692#comment-15218692
]
Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-8914:
--
TestStressLiveNodes w/o the rest of the patch failed 84/100 iterations
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/16385/
Java: 32bit/jdk-9-ea+111-patched -server -XX:+UseG1GC -XX:-CompactStrings
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 28 lines...]
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'
hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to fetch from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley resolved SOLR-8903.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for the review Steve! Maybe I should start generating patches from the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218651#comment-15218651
]
Marius Grama commented on SOLR-8851:
Issue can be reproduced (quite often) on the _techproducts_
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218651#comment-15218651
]
Marius Grama edited comment on SOLR-8851 at 3/30/16 7:23 PM:
-
Issue can be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley closed SOLR-2774.
--
Resolution: Invalid
SOLR-8903 removes the obsolete methods in DateUtil (now ExtractionDateUtil) so
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218630#comment-15218630
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-8903:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218626#comment-15218626
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-8903:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley closed SOLR-2773.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 6.0
Closing; fixed by SOLR-8904 (using Java 8 time APIs). There
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley closed SOLR-1899.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 6.0
Closing; fixed by SOLR-8904 (using Java 8 time APIs). There
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley resolved SOLR-8904.
Resolution: Fixed
> Switch from SimpleDateFormat to Java 8 DateTimeFormatter.ISO_INSTANT
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218575#comment-15218575
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-8904:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Molloy updated SOLR-8921:
---
Attachment: SOLR-8921.patch
Simplistic patch handling null queries without trying to guess why they're
Steve Molloy created SOLR-8921:
--
Summary: Potential NPE in pivot facet
Key: SOLR-8921
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8921
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218565#comment-15218565
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-8904:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul updated SOLR-5944:
-
Attachment: DUP.patch
> Support updates of numeric DocValues
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul updated SOLR-5944:
-
Attachment: (was: DUP.patch)
> Support updates of numeric DocValues
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218529#comment-15218529
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-8914:
--
Correct, the refreshCollectionListLock solves the same class of bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218518#comment-15218518
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-8914:
--
That was actually my first formulation, but that causes deadlock, see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218512#comment-15218512
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-7362:
This fails for me reproducibly, on the 6x branch (if that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218503#comment-15218503
]
Karl Wright edited comment on LUCENE-7150 at 3/30/16 6:21 PM:
--
[~mikemccand]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erick Erickson updated SOLR-8725:
-
Priority: Major (was: Blocker)
OK, Anshum is correct, this fix is in 6.0 so this shouldn't be a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218503#comment-15218503
]
Karl Wright commented on LUCENE-7150:
-
[~mikemccand] Thanks!
FWIW, polygons do not have the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-8914:
---
Attachment: SOLR-8914.patch
i've updated the patch to cleanup the test a bit -- besdies some cosmetic stuff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218469#comment-15218469
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7150:
Here're the results for querying 5-gons:
-
Thanks Shawn!
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/30/2016 8:46 AM, Nicholas Knize wrote:
> > In preparation for the 6.0 release I started (attempted) to create the
> > WIP release notes. Looks like those powers have not yet been granted.
> >
> >
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218457#comment-15218457
]
Anshum Gupta commented on SOLR-8725:
but a working version of this is in 6.0, so I don't think we need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218450#comment-15218450
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7150:
OK {{-poly 5 -geo3d}} now works! Thanks.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218449#comment-15218449
]
Nicholas Knize commented on LUCENE-7094:
+1
> spatial-extras BBoxStrategy and (confusingly!)
Nicholas Knize created LUCENE-7152:
--
Summary: Refactor lucene-spatial GeoUtils to core
Key: LUCENE-7152
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7152
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218423#comment-15218423
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-8914:
--
I'm beasting your latest patch too, I'll report anything that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218422#comment-15218422
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-6938:
--
that sounds correct ... on the 5.5 branch LUCENE_5_5_1 should _not_
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218424#comment-15218424
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-8904:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-:
-
Attachment: SOLR-.patch
New patch which returns all of the shortest paths. Manual tests look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218388#comment-15218388
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7150:
Thanks [~daddywri], I'll test!
> geo3d public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218360#comment-15218360
]
Karl Wright edited comment on LUCENE-7150 at 3/30/16 5:23 PM:
--
Use the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wright updated LUCENE-7150:
Attachment: LUCENE-7150.patch
Use the same convention as for 2D for polygons of repeating one
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/5746/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_72 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.analysis.pt.TestPortugueseAnalyzer
Error Message:
Could not remove the following files
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.0/1/
3 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.test
Error Message:
Timeout occured while waiting response from server at: https://127.0.0.1:60245
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218349#comment-15218349
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7150:
Ahh OK phew :)
Yes, I think (?) the 2D APIs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218313#comment-15218313
]
Karl Wright edited comment on LUCENE-7150 at 3/30/16 5:12 PM:
--
bq. What does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218339#comment-15218339
]
Shawn Heisey commented on LUCENE-6938:
--
Thanks, [~mikemccand]. That last commit made the script run
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15218327#comment-15218327
]
Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-8903:
--
+1, LGTM
FYI I had to apply the patch using IntelliJ - {{git apply}}
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo