[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7807) Test*RangeFieldQueries.testRandomBig() and .testRandomTiny() failures

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-7807. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 6.6 master (7.0) Closing now that LU

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 849 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Solaris/849/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudJSONFacetJoinDomain.testBespoke Error Message: {main(json.facet={top+:+{+type:terms,+field:field_9_is,+limit:+21

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+168) - Build # 19693 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/19693/ Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+168 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 4 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.ltr.TestLTRQParserPlugin.ltrMoreResultsThanReRankedTest Error Message: mismatch: '0.09271725'!='0.105360515' @ re

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10736) size of id field was limited under 1000000

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erick Erickson resolved SOLR-10736. --- Resolution: Incomplete Please raise issues on the user's list first, and if there's a bug _the

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10736) size of id field was limited under 1000000

finley0066 created SOLR-10736: - Summary: size of id field was limited under 100 Key: SOLR-10736 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10736 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug Secur

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 1319 - Failure!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/1319/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC No tests ran. Build Log: [...truncated 19 lines...] ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin' hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to fetch from git://git.apac

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-8047) large longs is being saved incorrect

Unfortunately I spent far too much time chasing this before that memory surfaced enough for me to check ;(... On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Pushkar Raste wrote: > I ran into this issue about 2 years back and posted it on the user list. > Yonik pointed out that it is Javascript issue :-) > > On

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 885 - Failure!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-MacOSX/885/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC No tests ran. Build Log: [...truncated 17 lines...] ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin' hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to fetch from git://git.ap

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 4024 - Still Failing!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX/4024/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC No tests ran. Build Log: [...truncated 11765 lines...] ERROR: command execution failed. ERROR: Step ‘Archive the artifacts’ failed: no workspace for Lucene-Solr-master-

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_131) - Build # 3576 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux/3576/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_131 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.ShardSplitTest.testSplitWithChaosMonkey Error Message: There are still nodes recoverying - waited for 330 secon

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7844) UnifiedHighlighter: simplify "maxPassages" input API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley updated LUCENE-7844: - Attachment: LUCENE_7844__UH_maxPassages_simplification.patch Here's a patch. In addition to the

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10700) In 7.0 stop using the PostingsHighlighter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022262#comment-16022262 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10700: Commit 87

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10317) Solr Nightly Benchmarks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022252#comment-16022252 ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-10317: -- Guys, did you look at https:/

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_131) - Build # 19692 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/19692/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_131 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 4 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.ltr.TestLTRQParserPlugin.ltrMoreResultsThanReRankedTest Error Message: mismatch: '0.09271725'!='0.105360515' @ re

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Windows (32bit/jdk1.8.0_131) - Build # 6581 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/6581/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_131 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC 6 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPISolrJTest.testCreateAndDeleteShard Error Message: Error from server at https://127.0.0.1:51366/solr: deleteshard

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10634) Move calculation of some aggregations to collection phase

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-10634. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 6.7 master (7.0) OK, I added DebugAgg t

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10634) Move calculation of some aggregations to collection phase

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022210#comment-16022210 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10634: Commit 4f

Re: setMinimumNumberShouldMatch() for SynonymQuery

Indeed! After I posted the question, I thought same thing. :) I withdraw it but let me explain the background of the issue. In a project, we've been using NGramTokenFilter since Solr 5.5 and the field which uses the TokenFilter is used from edismax. The problem I mentioned became actual when

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10634) Move calculation of some aggregations to collection phase

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022159#comment-16022159 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10634: Commit d6

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-master - Build # 1309 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-master/1309/ 8 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.join.TestJoinUtil.testEquals_numericJoin Error Message: Query shouldn't be equal, because different index readers Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError: Query shouldn't b

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10438) schema-point.xml and TestPointFields have suspicious assumptions about useDocValuesAsStored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Rowe resolved SOLR-10438. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Steve Rowe Fix Version/s: 6.7 master (7.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10438) schema-point.xml and TestPointFields have suspicious assumptions about useDocValuesAsStored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022133#comment-16022133 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10438: Commit ae

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10438) schema-point.xml and TestPointFields have suspicious assumptions about useDocValuesAsStored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022135#comment-16022135 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10438: Commit ea

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10438) schema-point.xml and TestPointFields have suspicious assumptions about useDocValuesAsStored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Rowe updated SOLR-10438: -- Attachment: SOLR-10438.patch Patch, explicitly sets useDocValuesAsStored on all point fields/fieldtypes

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_131) - Build # 19691 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/19691/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_131 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 5 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.join.TestJoinUtil.testEquals_numericJoin Error Message: Query shouldn't be equal, because different index readers

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-8047) large longs is being saved incorrect

I ran into this issue about 2 years back and posted it on the user list. Yonik pointed out that it is Javascript issue :-) On May 19, 2017 2:50 PM, "Erick Erickson (JIRA)" wrote: > > [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8047?page= > com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:al

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 1318 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/1318/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 7 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.StressHdfsTest.test Error Message: java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Could not connect to ZooKeeper 127.0.0.1:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10317) Solr Nightly Benchmarks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022024#comment-16022024 ] Vivek Narang commented on SOLR-10317: - Hi [~ichattopadhyaya] An update, now the follow

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10637) org.apache.solr.client.solrj.util.ClientUtils.toSolrInputDocument is removed in Solr 6.0 and there is no alternative

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021993#comment-16021993 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-10637: - bq. No problem. Unfortunately, my IRC session was close

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7540) Upgrade ICU to 58.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021985#comment-16021985 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-7540: - +1, I think http://bugs.icu-project.org/trac/t

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7540) Upgrade ICU to 58.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021973#comment-16021973 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7540: +1, thank you [~jimczi]! > Upgr

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 884 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-MacOSX/884/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CustomCollectionTest.testRouteFieldForHashRouter Error Message: Collection not found: routeFieldColl Stack Trace:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10700) In 7.0 stop using the PostingsHighlighter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021915#comment-16021915 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-10700: - The _deprecation_ of Postings*Solr*Highlighter

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10123) Analytics Component 2.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Houston Putman updated SOLR-10123: -- Attachment: SOLR-10123.patch > Analytics Component 2.0 > --- > >

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10123) Analytics Component 2.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Houston Putman updated SOLR-10123: -- Description: A completely redesigned Analytics Component, introducing the following features: *

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10700) In 7.0 stop using the PostingsHighlighter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021913#comment-16021913 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10700: Commit f2

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10700) In 7.0 stop using the PostingsHighlighter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021910#comment-16021910 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10700: Commit f2

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7815) Remove PostingsHighlighter in 7.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021877#comment-16021877 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7815: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10700) In 7.0 stop using the PostingsHighlighter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021854#comment-16021854 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-10700: - IIUC the changes you made, then yeah ... even if the co

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9601) DIH: Radicially simplify Tika example to only show relevant configuration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021846#comment-16021846 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9601: --- Commit fd8ac

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9623) Disable remote streaming by default

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021847#comment-16021847 ] Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-9623: --- I follow that logic, to upper the default limit both

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7383) DIH: rewrite XPathEntityProcessor/RSS example as the smallest good demo possible

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021845#comment-16021845 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-7383: --- Commit fd8ac

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9601) DIH: Radicially simplify Tika example to only show relevant configuration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021843#comment-16021843 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9601: --- Commit 2d054

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7383) DIH: rewrite XPathEntityProcessor/RSS example as the smallest good demo possible

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021842#comment-16021842 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-7383: --- Commit 2d054

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7383) DIH: rewrite XPathEntityProcessor/RSS example as the smallest good demo possible

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021840#comment-16021840 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-7383: --- Commit 2319d

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9601) DIH: Radicially simplify Tika example to only show relevant configuration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021841#comment-16021841 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9601: --- Commit 2319d

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10721) Provide a way to know when Core Discovery is finished and when all async cores are done loading

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erick Erickson resolved SOLR-10721. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 6.7 master (7.0) > Provide a way to

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+168) - Build # 19690 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/19690/ Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+168 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 4 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.ltr.TestLTRQParserPlugin.ltrMoreResultsThanReRankedTest Error Message: mismatch: '0.09271725'!='0.105360515' @ response/docs

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9623) Disable remote streaming by default

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021784#comment-16021784 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9623: bq. Changes all multipartUploadLimitInKB="2048000"

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10735) Solr is broken when directory with spaces used on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021778#comment-16021778 ] Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-10735: +1 to blocker. A regression in such a central fea

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 4023 - Failure!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX/4023/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 5 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest.test Error Message: Could not find collection:collection2 Stack Trace: java.lang.Asser

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10700) In 7.0 stop using the PostingsHighlighter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021769#comment-16021769 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-10700: - So do you suggest I update 6.x & 6.6 ASAP to in

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9153) Update beanutils version to 1.9.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021751#comment-16021751 ] Hrishikesh Gadre commented on SOLR-9153: [~mdrob] What's your take on this? Should

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9623) Disable remote streaming by default

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-9623: -- Priority: Blocker (was: Major) > Disable remote streaming by default > -

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10721) Provide a way to know when Core Discovery is finished and when all async cores are done loading

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021742#comment-16021742 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10721: Commit 6f

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10721) Provide a way to know when Core Discovery is finished and when all async cores are done loading

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021743#comment-16021743 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10721: Commit 8f

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7540) Upgrade ICU to 58.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jim Ferenczi updated LUCENE-7540: - Attachment: LUCENE-7540.patch [~mikemccand] I ran into the same bug when trying to upgrade icu to

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10721) Provide a way to know when Core Discovery is finished and when all async cores are done loading

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021697#comment-16021697 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10721: Commit 28

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10721) Provide a way to know when Core Discovery is finished and when all async cores are done loading

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erick Erickson updated SOLR-10721: -- Attachment: SOLR-10721.patch Final patch with CHANGES > Provide a way to know when Core Discove

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7810) false positive equality: distinctly diff join queries return equals()==true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021681#comment-16021681 ] Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-7810: --- The change has been backpo

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7810) false positive equality: distinctly diff join queries return equals()==true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-7810: -- Fix Version/s: 6.6 > false positive equality: distinctly diff join queries retu

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

Thanks, I've pushed the change to the 6.6 branch. On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 8:42 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure Martijn, please go ahead. Thanks. > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Martijn v Groningen < > martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Ishan, >>

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7810) false positive equality: distinctly diff join queries return equals()==true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021673#comment-16021673 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7810: - Commit

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_131) - Build # 908 - Still unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Windows/908/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_131 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.schema.TestUseDocValuesAsStored.testMultipleSearchResults Error Message: mismatch: 'myid1'!='myid' @ response/docs/[0]/id

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10735) Solr is broken when directory with spaces used on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021667#comment-16021667 ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-10735: - While I have some time before I

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

Uwe, I've filed SOLR-10735 for the first issue you reported. Thanks, Ishan On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > I tried, > > the 6.6 branch and this test release has 2 problems: > > > >- The startup script (Windows at lea

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10735) Solr is broken when directory with spaces used on Windows

Ishan Chattopadhyaya created SOLR-10735: --- Summary: Solr is broken when directory with spaces used on Windows Key: SOLR-10735 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10735 Project: Solr

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10233) Add support for different replica types in Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021665#comment-16021665 ] Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on SOLR-10233: -- Thanks Steve, looking into fi

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10700) In 7.0 stop using the PostingsHighlighter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021631#comment-16021631 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-10700: - David: if {{hl.method=postings}} is deprecated in 6x th

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7815) Remove PostingsHighlighter in 7.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021629#comment-16021629 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-7815: -- Hmmm ... ok, i guess i'm confused by the distinction

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

Sure Martijn, please go ahead. Thanks. On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Martijn v Groningen < martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ishan, > > I like to backport LUCENE-7810 to the 6.6 branch. Is that okay with you? > > Martijn > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:02 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ic

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7815) Remove PostingsHighlighter in 7.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley resolved LUCENE-7815. -- Resolution: Fixed > Remove PostingsHighlighter in 7.0 > - > >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7815) Remove PostingsHighlighter in 7.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021625#comment-16021625 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7815: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7815) Remove PostingsHighlighter in 7.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021613#comment-16021613 ] David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7815: -- [~hossman] I think you meant for your commen

[jira] [Closed] (SOLR-10238) Remove LatLonType in 7.0; replaced by LatLonPointSpatialField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley closed SOLR-10238. --- Resolution: Won't Fix Marking as won't-fix. We can outright remove this and other spatial fields I d

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7815) Remove PostingsHighlighter in 7.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021595#comment-16021595 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-7815: -- david: now that the ref-guide is in git, can you ple

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10238) Remove LatLonType in 7.0; replaced by LatLonPointSpatialField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021592#comment-16021592 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-10238: - bq. I think it would be too soon. AFAIK we try to keep

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-10731) Add knn Streaming Expression

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joel Bernstein reassigned SOLR-10731: - Assignee: Joel Bernstein > Add knn Streaming Expression > >

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10731) Add knn Streaming Expression

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-10731: -- Attachment: SOLR-10731.patch Basic implementation without tests. > Add knn Streaming Expression

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10338) Configure SecureRandom non blocking for tests.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021555#comment-16021555 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-10338: - no major concerns. minor concerns... * the {{log.info

Re: Release planning for 7.0

On 5/23/2017 9:14 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Do others expect there to be a 6.7 release? I'm guessing there'll be a > 6.7, and maybe one or two 6.7.x releases while 7.x settles down and/or > we want to put a bow on the 6x code line. > > Really a plea for people not to assume that the 6x code line

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

Hi Ishan, I like to backport LUCENE-7810 to the 6.6 branch. Is that okay with you? Martijn On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:02 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Adrien! +1 for the LUCENE-7847 merge. > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Hi I

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_131) - Build # 6580 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/6580/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_131 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 4 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.ltr.TestLTRQParserPlugin.ltrMoreResultsThanReRankedTest Error Message: mismatch: '0.09271725'!='0.105360515' @ response

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+168) - Build # 19689 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/19689/ Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+168 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 4 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.ltr.TestLTRQParserPlugin.ltrMoreResultsThanReRankedTest Error Message: mismatch: '0.09271725'!='0.105360515' @ response/docs

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10233) Add support for different replica types in Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anshum Gupta updated SOLR-10233: Fix Version/s: master (7.0) > Add support for different replica types in Solr >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10338) Configure SecureRandom non blocking for tests.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021502#comment-16021502 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-10338: I like this approach. I have to finish testing it

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10728) fix/improve rat-sources and check-forbidden-api in solr-ref-guide

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021499#comment-16021499 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-10728: - bq. I suggest to use the same layout for the ref guide

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

Thanks Adrien! +1 for the LUCENE-7847 merge. On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > Hi Ishan, > > I closed LUCENE-7573 which is actually not a problem. We thought it would > be buggy or at least trappy given another bug that was discovered but the > merge logic actually uses the

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1

Hi Ishan, I closed LUCENE-7573 which is actually not a problem. We thought it would be buggy or at least trappy given another bug that was discovered but the merge logic actually uses the doc-values API in a way that there should not be problems. I took the opportunity of the respin to merge http

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7847) RangeFieldQuery optimization for "all docs match" is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-7847. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 6.6 master (7.0) > RangeFieldQuery o

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7847) RangeFieldQuery optimization for "all docs match" is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021443#comment-16021443 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7847: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7847) RangeFieldQuery optimization for "all docs match" is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021445#comment-16021445 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7847: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7847) RangeFieldQuery optimization for "all docs match" is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021442#comment-16021442 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7847: - Commit

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.6 - Build # 11 - Still unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.6/11/ 4 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexSorting.testRandom3 Error Message: Test abandoned because suite timeout was reached. Stack Trace: java.lang.Exception: Test abandoned because suite timeout was reached.

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7810) false positive equality: distinctly diff join queries return equals()==true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021435#comment-16021435 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7810: -- Should we backport to branch_6_6 since we ar

Re: Release planning for 7.0

Adrien: Right, thus my "if it's easy" clause ;) I'm not suggesting at all that we go very far down this road, more "if it merges cleanly and makes sense, backport. Maybe. If you feel like it". And I'm _really_ not suggesting that we try to back-port anything that would make our lives harder, mor

Re: Release planning for 7.0

I would like to have a 6.7 release if possible, to wrap up some features for users in the 6x branch. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > Le mar. 23 mai 2017 à 17:15, Erick Erickson a > écrit : > >> Do others expect there to be a

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7810) false positive equality: distinctly diff join queries return equals()==true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021421#comment-16021421 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-7810: -- Looks like jira-bot missed the 6x backport commit...

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7847) RangeFieldQuery optimization for "all docs match" is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021419#comment-16021419 ] Nicholas Knize commented on LUCENE-7847: +1 Love the simplicity of the scorer an

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9530) Add an Atomic Update Processor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16021392#comment-16021392 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9530: --- Commit 31e02

  1   2   >