Do these two options conflate concerns of input format vs. actual
algorithm? That was always my disappointment.
I feel like the java apis are off here at the lower level, and it
hurts the user.
I don't talk about the input format from the user, instead I mean the
execution of the faceting query.
Summary: I've been contemplating a simple enhancement to how SolrCloud
resolves files in a configSet: when a file isn't in ZooKeeper, fallback
resolution to the same-named configset on the file system (which normally
is ignored in SolrCloud today). A further fallback to _default on the
filesyste
Thanks all, I'll respin. I'll abort this RC1.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 5:08 AM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> -1 for RC1.
>
> The fix has been merged into 8x and 8.8 branches so we should be able to
> respin and start another vote.
>
> Thanks for the fix, Tim!
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 2:42 PM Mike Drob
There's a JIRA issue about this from 5 years ago:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7296
I don't recall seeing any resistance to the idea of having the JSON
Faceting module act as a back-end to the front-end (API surface) of Solr's
common/classic/original/whatever faceting API. I don't th
Hi all,
Sorry to spam the list. I am querying the list in such quick succession
because of a realization I came to while on Twitter. Is it time to
deprecate the Legacy Facet API?
I understood in the past that they behaved slightly differently. Now, I'm
wondering if it makes sense to keep the lega
Hi All,
In looking at the Java Docs, our Lucene team noticed that the `@` symbol is
a reserved character in the Lucene regular expression syntax.
In re-visiting the page in curiosity, I found that the symbol was
[Optional] for "any string." This came at a surprise because there's a very
common wa
I have a PR ready here: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2231
Thanks in advance for taking a look.
Is anyone game to help me back port this to the upcoming minor version in
8.7?
Thank you,
Oren
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 5:56 PM Oren Ovadia wrote:
> Thanks for the responses and advice.
-1 for RC1.
The fix has been merged into 8x and 8.8 branches so we should be able to
respin and start another vote.
Thanks for the fix, Tim!
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 2:42 PM Mike Drob wrote:
> -1
>
> I have been able to reproduce the regression that Anshum found, and would
> like to change my v
Ah yeah, that was my bad ... missed some code in the backport to 8x. Fix is
in but needs a re-spin :-( Thanks for reporting / verifying Anshum & Mike
Cheers,
Tim
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 3:42 PM Mike Drob wrote:
> -1
>
> I have been able to reproduce the regression that Anshum found, and would
>
-1
I have been able to reproduce the regression that Anshum found, and would
like to change my vote accordingly.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 4:31 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15097
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 2:28 PM Anshum Gupta
> wrote:
>
>> While testi
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15097
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 2:28 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> While testing the artifacts some more, I realized that the cluster graph
> doesn't show up on the admin UI any more.
>
> I started the cluster with -e cloud -noprompt, and the getting started
While testing the artifacts some more, I realized that the cluster graph
doesn't show up on the admin UI any more.
I started the cluster with -e cloud -noprompt, and the getting started
collection was created successfully. The clusterstate, as well as the admin
UI confirm that.
I also tried creat
There was an unfortunate period where the repo was migrated, but we weren't
able to make the necessary changes to the mailing lists.
They should have been fixed roughly a week ago though. The new GH Issue/PR
emails should be going to the "issues" list.
- Houston
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 4:12 PM D
Hi!
I recently posted about profiling the nightly benchmarks, and in the
process of doing that I came across an exception that looks rather nasty. I
was about to create a Jira issue, but the nice Jira submit form told me to
post it here or in irc first.
The Lucene commit where I saw this was
eb24
I've observed lots of dev list messages from g...@apache.org for the
lucene-solr-operator project. They should be directed to the "issues" list
instead. Anshum, is this for you to handle?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
AIUI, you are basically proposing a *new* "expand.fl" that would work for
the ExpandComponent similarly to how similar parameters work for the
SubQueryTransformer and ChildDocTransformer. Makes sense to me.
FWIW I think ExpandComponent's "expand.field" should be replaced with a
Solr DocTransforme
+1 (binding)
Ran performance tests comparing Solr 8.7 to 8.8, saw significant
improvement with collection creation as reported on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15052
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 2:28 PM Julie Tibshirani
wrote:
> +1
> SUCCESS! [0:52:56.337991]
>
> Julie
>
> On Thu, Jan 2
+1
SUCCESS! [0:52:56.337991]
Julie
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:13 PM Anshum Gupta
wrote:
> +1
> SUCCESS! [0:59:24.721238]
>
> Smoke tester passed, tried running a sample app with tons of collections
> created, random data indexed, and some querying and all looked fine w/
> SolrJ.
>
> The changel
+1
SUCCESS! [0:59:24.721238]
Smoke tester passed, tried running a sample app with tons of collections
created, random data indexed, and some querying and all looked fine w/
SolrJ.
The changelog looks good too.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:51 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wro
+1 (non-binding)
I've merged branch locally and running our team's (Amazon Search) benchmark
tools. Everything looks good.
David Smiley 于2021年1月21日周四 上午9:30写道：
> +1
> SUCCESS! [1:17:50.702261]
>
> Thanks for your thorough testing Tim :-)
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
+1
SUCCESS! [1:17:50.702261]
Thanks for your thorough testing Tim :-)
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:49 AM Andrzej Białecki wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [1:31:27.365392]
>
>
> > On 20 Jan 2021, at 08:
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [1:31:27.365392]
> On 20 Jan 2021, at 08:39, Atri Sharma wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [1:04:15:20393]
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 1:03 PM Ignacio Vera wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:05:30.358141]
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:25 PM Timothy
+1
SUCCESS! [0:45:03.172117]
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:51 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.
+1
SUCCESS! [1:10:23.173123]
On Ubuntu 20.04.1
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:30 AM jim ferenczi wrote:
>
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [1:06:13.147855]
>
> Le mer. 20 janv. 2021 à 08:39, Atri Sharma a écrit :
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:04:15:20393]
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 1:03 PM Ignacio Vera
24 matches
Mail list logo
