Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr TLP - Mailing lists created

As a lot of you reached out to me about wanting to unsubscribe and I'm unable to manually process this for each of you, I recommend folks who want to unsubscribe from a mailing list to do so by just sending an email to -unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org or -unsubscr...@solr.apache.org, based on what

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Windows (64bit/jdk-13.0.2) - Build # 9738 - Still Unstable!

Most likely due to SOLR-15154 , I'll take a look On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 4:21 PM Policeman Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/9738/ > Java: 64bit/jdk-13.0.2 -XX:+UseCompressedOops

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr TLP - Mailing lists created

Hi everyone, I'd like to inform you that new mailing lists have been created as part of the bootstrapping of the newly created Apache Solr TLP. Below are all the lists and their corresponding subscription request addresses that will be used for Solr going forward: 1. *Solr Dev* -

Re: Separate Solr build: help with the remaining last mile needed.

For posterity, the docker build broke because github changed the version of ubuntu_latest in github actions from 18.04 to 20.04. The ACL package is installed by default in Ubuntu 18, but not Ubuntu 20. Installing it at the beginning of the docker action fixes the build. On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at

Re: Removal of Apache HttpComponents/HttpClient for 9.0?

I filed an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15223 "Deprecate HttpSolrClient, mark httpcomponents dep as "optional" in SolrJ" ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:45 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Auth tie

Re: Separate Solr build: help with the remaining last mile needed.

I created a PR for the tests https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2462 On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 1:43 PM Dawid Weiss wrote: > This can be done later too, it's not crucial - these files will be > just ignored for compilation immediately after the split. > > D. > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 8:11

Lucene (unexpected ) fsync on existing segments

Hello, We have a process which backs up the index (Solr 7.7.2) on a schedule. The way we do it is we first save a commit point on the index and then using Solr's /replication handler, get the list of files in that generation. After the backup completes, we release the commit point (Please note

Re: Removal of Apache HttpComponents/HttpClient for 9.0?

Auth tie in to core, solrJ, AdminUI and bin/solr. Currently we can only make packages for core. Should look in to extend the package spec to support plugging in these other parts too. But guess we could make Core parts of the auth plug-ins into (1st party) packages and just leave the html and,

Re: Separate Solr build: help with the remaining last mile needed.

This can be done later too, it's not crucial - these files will be just ignored for compilation immediately after the split. D. On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 8:11 PM Mike Drob wrote: > > I think I can make TestICUCollationField work without depending on Lucene > test sources. The other two will be a

Re: Separate Solr build: help with the remaining last mile needed.

I think I can make TestICUCollationField work without depending on Lucene test sources. The other two will be a bit trickier. On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 1:56 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > > ./gradlew -Dskip.lucene=true assemble check -x test -x documentation > > -x checkBrokenLinks -x

Re: Guys, I think SolrCloud might be sic.

So I’m done with my mode and effort meant to ensure I don’t get knocked out like a year and a half ago. There is still some ongoing effort with some others that will happen to solidify this work. Essentially though, my starburst and then stellar effort is done (even the party Melinda my effort

Re: Removal of Apache HttpComponents/HttpClient for 9.0?

+1 David > Oh I see; there are entanglements with Solr's authentication plugins Maybe we should move the authentication plugins to contribs (don't know if we'll need one or two, one for client-side and one for server-side? I haven't looked much at the code). Plus, we are shipping with multiple

Re: Removal of Apache HttpComponents/HttpClient for 9.0?

An even smaller baby step is to mark the httpclient dependency as "optional" in the Maven pom we generate. This is a clue to consumers to move on. Also marking HttpSolrClient deprecated. ~ David On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:06 AM David Smiley wrote: > Oh I see; there are entanglements with

Re: Removal of Apache HttpComponents/HttpClient for 9.0?

Oh I see; there are entanglements with Solr's authentication plugins :-( One step in this direction is to *move* it from SolrJ to solr-core. If someone using SolrJ wants to pass whatever security tokens in headers, they can add their own interceptors. Also, SolrJ 8 will likely work fine with