[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16866797#comment-16866797
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8769:
-
I think we would still need a way to process NOT ranges (for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8857:
Attachment: LUCENE-8857.patch
> Refactor TopDocs#Merge To Take In Custom Tie Breakers
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16866608#comment-16866608
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8857:
-
[~simonw] The reason I did not add a default comparator for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16866564#comment-16866564
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8857:
-
I havent added a line in MIGRATE.txt highlighting that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16866467#comment-16866467
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8862:
-
Right, agreed.
Another thought was if we should add the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16866452#comment-16866452
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8862:
-
{quote}doing it in setNextReader might perform the check long
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16866438#comment-16866438
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8862:
-
Ah, hmm, so your thought is that the memory tracker itself
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16866431#comment-16866431
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8862:
-
Another option could be to introduce an interface which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16866423#comment-16866423
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8862:
-
[~jpountz] What are your thoughts on the options of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16866349#comment-16866349
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8862:
-
We should probably add a visitLeafCollector(LeafCollector) in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16866328#comment-16866328
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8857:
-
Attached is an updated patch. Does that look inline?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8857:
Attachment: LUCENE-8857.patch
> Refactor TopDocs#Merge To Take In Custom Tie Breakers
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16865883#comment-16865883
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8862:
-
The reason I was thinking of a visitor api is since it gives
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16865873#comment-16865873
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8862:
-
Visitor could have an API to take in a memory tracking object
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16865809#comment-16865809
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8862:
-
Thinking more about this, I am more inclined to do the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16865610#comment-16865610
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8862:
-
{quote}Memory accounting has a cost API-wise
{quote}
Agreed,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16864783#comment-16864783
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8855:
-
{quote}Or alternatively compute a rough estimate of the
Atri Sharma created LUCENE-8864:
---
Summary: Add Query Memory Estimation Ability in QueryVisitor
Key: LUCENE-8864
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8864
Project: Lucene - Core
Atri Sharma created LUCENE-8862:
---
Summary: Collector Level Dynamic Memory Accounting
Key: LUCENE-8862
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8862
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16864263#comment-16864263
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8829:
-
[~jpountz] [~simonw] I have updated LUCENE-8857 to remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16864258#comment-16864258
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8857:
-
Removed setShardIndex and the ability to set shard index in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8857:
Attachment: LUCENE-8857.patch
> Refactor TopDocs#Merge To Take In Custom Tie Breakers
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16864097#comment-16864097
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8855:
-
+1, important change!
I had a few comments/questions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863946#comment-16863946
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8829:
-
+1, I agree
Do you think we should pursue LUCENE-8857 as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863821#comment-16863821
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8857:
-
Attached is a patch implementing this technique. It adds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8857:
Attachment: LUCENE-8857.patch
> Refactor TopDocs#Merge To Take In Custom Tie Breakers
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863752#comment-16863752
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8811:
-
Please let me know if the patch looks fine. Happy to iterate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863734#comment-16863734
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8791:
-
I will take a look today
> Add CollectorRescorer
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863075#comment-16863075
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8829:
-
bq. I am not sure we have to. Can't a user initialize it
Atri Sharma created LUCENE-8857:
---
Summary: Refactor TopDocs#Merge To Take In Custom Tie Breakers
Key: LUCENE-8857
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8857
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862914#comment-16862914
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8829:
-
[~simonw] That is a fun idea, although it would still need a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862806#comment-16862806
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8769:
-
Attached is an updated patch.
I have refactored the patch to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8769:
Attachment: LUCENE-8769.patch
> Range Query Type With Logically Connected Ranges
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8811:
Attachment: LUCENE-8811.patch
> Add maximum clause count check to IndexSearcher rather than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862005#comment-16862005
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8811:
-
Thanks [~jpountz], attached is an updated patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16861895#comment-16861895
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8839:
-
[~jpountz] So what we can do is commit 8811 as is,and use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16861835#comment-16861835
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8829:
-
[~simonw] Essentially, allow users to pass in the tie breaker
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16861832#comment-16861832
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8839:
-
[~jpountz] I agree that we can open up utility methods for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16860937#comment-16860937
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8811:
-
[~romseygeek] Please let me know if this looks fine. Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8829:
Attachment: LUCENE-8829.patch
> TopDocs#Merge is Tightly Coupled To Number Of Collectors Involved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16860923#comment-16860923
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8829:
-
[~jpountz] Attached is an updated patch.
I have moved the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16860713#comment-16860713
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8829:
-
bq. I mean ordering on score or sort fields, then shardIndex,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16860679#comment-16860679
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8829:
-
bq. I wonder whether we could rely on the fact that ScoreDoc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16860621#comment-16860621
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8829:
-
[~jpountz] Agreed that the API is a bit weird in the proposed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8829:
Attachment: LUCENE-8829.patch
> TopDocs#Merge is Tightly Coupled To Number Of Collectors Involved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16860181#comment-16860181
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8757:
-
[~hossman] This is a known issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16860030#comment-16860030
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8845:
-
++, LGTM
> Allow maxExpansions to be set on multi-term
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16860026#comment-16860026
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8362:
-
Thanks for pushing this, Adrien!
> Add DocValue support for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16860025#comment-16860025
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8769:
-
This sets the base for the structures needed for OR and NOT.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16860006#comment-16860006
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8845:
-
Patch looks good and a useful change!
Here are some minor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16859902#comment-16859902
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8769:
-
Attached is an updated patch with more checks and tests.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8769:
Attachment: LUCENE-8769.patch
> Range Query Type With Logically Connected Ranges
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16859884#comment-16859884
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8362:
-
Thanks Adrien, attached is an updated patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8362:
Attachment: LUCENE-8362.patch
> Add DocValue support for RangeFields
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16859796#comment-16859796
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8362:
-
Some minor test formatting cleanups
[^LUCENE-8362.patch]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8362:
Attachment: LUCENE-8362.patch
> Add DocValue support for RangeFields
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16859789#comment-16859789
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8769:
-
Here is a first cut at the said approach. This patch only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8769:
Attachment: LUCENE-8769.patch
> Range Query Type With Logically Connected Ranges
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16859421#comment-16859421
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8769:
-
Here is a proposal for the said feature:
A new Binary query
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16859239#comment-16859239
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8791:
-
bq. could we make the single-threaded constructor take a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16859212#comment-16859212
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8829:
-
[~jpountz] Does it make sense to backport this to earlier
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16859205#comment-16859205
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8841:
-
Could we consider resurrecting it then?
--
Regards,
Atri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16858906#comment-16858906
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8362:
-
[~jpountz] Please let me know if the latest iteration needs
Atri Sharma created LUCENE-8841:
---
Summary: Explore Relevance Based Performance Benchmarks
Key: LUCENE-8841
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8841
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16858823#comment-16858823
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8825:
-
[~jpountz] Thanks a lot!
> Improve Print Info Of CheckHits
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16858721#comment-16858721
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8811:
-
[~romseygeek] Please let me know if the current iteration
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16858720#comment-16858720
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8839:
-
[~jpountz] LUCENE-8811 focuses speifically on adding checks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16858661#comment-16858661
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8811:
-
[~thetaphi] Arent consumeTerms and visitLeaf mutually
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16858654#comment-16858654
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8811:
-
[~romseygeek] Thanks, attached is an updated patch.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8811:
Attachment: LUCENE-8811.patch
> Add maximum clause count check to IndexSearcher rather than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16858623#comment-16858623
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8811:
-
[~romseygeek] Ok, I misinterpreted your previous comment to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16858580#comment-16858580
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8840:
-
I am curious to understand how including doc frequencies can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16858494#comment-16858494
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8839:
-
[~romseygeek] [~jpountz] FYI please. Will post a patch post
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8811:
Attachment: LUCENE-8811.patch
> Add maximum clause count check to IndexSearcher rather than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16858459#comment-16858459
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8811:
-
[~romseygeek] Attached is a patch which does just that and
Atri Sharma created LUCENE-8839:
---
Summary: Add IndexSearcher Level Query Max Clause Count Limits
Key: LUCENE-8839
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8839
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8811:
Attachment: LUCENE-8811.patch
> Add maximum clause count check to IndexSearcher rather than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16858272#comment-16858272
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8811:
-
The last patch had an unintentional type: attached is a fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8811:
Attachment: LUCENE-8811.patch
> Add maximum clause count check to IndexSearcher rather than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16857957#comment-16857957
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8811:
-
[~jpountz] [~romseygeek] Attached patch implements a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16857501#comment-16857501
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8829:
-
Attached is an updated patch with additional tests. I was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8829:
Attachment: LUCENE-8829.patch
> TopDocs#Merge is Tightly Coupled To Number Of Collectors Involved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8362:
Attachment: LUCENE-8362.patch
> Add DocValue support for RangeFields
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16857406#comment-16857406
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8362:
-
[~jpountz] Sure, does attached look fine?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16857368#comment-16857368
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8825:
-
[~jpountz] Thanks!
Any change we could push this change?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8362:
Attachment: LUCENE-8362.patch
> Add DocValue support for RangeFields
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16857363#comment-16857363
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8362:
-
[~jpountz] Thanks, attached is an updated patch.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16856693#comment-16856693
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8362:
-
Thanks Adrien!
> Add DocValue support for RangeFields
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16856668#comment-16856668
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8362:
-
Does this patch look like in a commitable shape now? Anything
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16856657#comment-16856657
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8825:
-
Does this look useful? I think this is a simple change that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16856480#comment-16856480
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8819:
-
[~jpountz] I have added a patch to LUCENE-8829 to essentially
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16856478#comment-16856478
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8829:
-
Attached is a patch implementing a fix for this. Note that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Atri Sharma updated LUCENE-8829:
Attachment: LUCENE-8829.patch
> TopDocs#Merge is Tightly Coupled To Number Of Collectors Involved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16856004#comment-16856004
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8819:
-
[~jpountz] Yes, the problem is that there is no
Atri Sharma created LUCENE-8829:
---
Summary: TopDocs#Merge is Tightly Coupled To Number Of Collectors
Involved
Key: LUCENE-8829
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8829
Project: Lucene -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16855904#comment-16855904
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8819:
-
[~ivera] Yes, you should not be getting different results.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16855685#comment-16855685
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8825:
-
[~ivera] This is a follow up from 8824, JFYI.
> Improve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16855680#comment-16855680
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8362:
-
I have opened up a follow up Jira for the follow up:
Atri Sharma created LUCENE-8826:
---
Summary: Support CROSSES, WITHIN and CONTAINS Range Query For
Range DocValues Fields
Key: LUCENE-8826
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8826
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16855586#comment-16855586
]
Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8825:
-
Attached is a patch for the same.
[^LUCENE-8825.patch]
>
101 - 200 of 338 matches
Mail list logo
