On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the developers list may not be the right place to find strong maven
> supporters. All developers know lucene from inside out and are perfectly fine
> to install lucene from whatever artifact.
> Those people using maven are your end user
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> BTW: What is CutOffQueryWrapper?
its an application internal class though
simon
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> Fro
That all makes perfect sense to me +1
simon
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Hi
>
> Few days ago Robert and I discussed this matter over IRC and thought it's
> something we should bring forward to the list. This issue arise due to
> recent index format change introduced in L
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> I can reproduce this, lets open an issue
Just for the record - I can reproduce this after about 200 runs with
that seed :(
but is seems its not related to my latest commit though, robert you
haven't had that checked out yet ey?
>
> On Mon, J
hey folks,
Google has announce GSoC 2011 lately and mentoring organizations can
start submitting applications by the end of feb
(http://www.google-melange.com/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2011/timeline).
I wonder if we should participate this year again? I think we have
plenty of work to
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Big +1.
>
> We need all the help we can get...
>
> Should we make a wiki page where we can post/iterate on the ideas?
done - http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/SummerOfCode2011
>
> Mike
>
> On Mon, Jan
nks grant!
>
>
> On Jan 24, 2011, at 3:29 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>
>> hey folks,
>>
>> Google has announce GSoC 2011 lately and mentoring organizations can
>> start submitting applications by the end of feb
>> (http://www.google-melange.com/documen
t; +1
>>
>> I also have an idea from the attributes and TokenStream policeman. So I
>> could even help mentoring.
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>>
>>
>> "Simon Willnauer" schrieb:
>>
>>> hey folks,
>>>
>>> Google has
s. Tickets, news on the
conference, and the final schedule are be published at
http://berlinbuzzwords.de.
Program Chairs:
Isabel Drost
Jan Lehnardt
Simon Willnauer
Please re-distribute this CfP to people who might be interested.
Contact us at:
newthinking communications
GmbH Schönhauser Allee
Hey there,
I am seeing weird behavior if I search for a simple query via solr and
the fq param is empty. The cause of this seems that the QueryComponent
tries to parse the fq params and collects its values into a list which
is set to the RepsonseBuilder. But if the param is the empty string
(defau
is disabled
+if (!filters.isEmpty()) {
+ rb.setFilters( filters );
+}
}
} catch (ParseException e) {
throw new SolrException(SolrException.ErrorCode.BAD_REQUEST, e);
seems like a bug to me really
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
;>
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Simon Willnauer
>> wrote:
>> > Yet in my case we don't use filters and have
>> > filtercache disabled. I think this is a trap for users which are in
>> > similar situation.
>>
>> That situation sh
y when David contacted me in the first
place :)
it's all yours :)
simon
>
> His response likely to follow...
>
> - Mark
>
> On Jan 28, 2011, at 11:32 AM, David Nemeskey wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have already sent this mail to Simon Willnauer, and
; about adding more flexibility (with some prototypes etc):
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/72787e0e54f798e4/baby_steps
>> _towards_making_lucene_s_scoring_more_flexible
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2392
>
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11
Torsten,
mail to: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
to unsubscribe!
simon
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Torsten Eberhardt
wrote:
> unsubscribe
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additio
Seems like we don't respect segments that don't return hits for a
certain query
Index: lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/IndexSearcher.java
===
--- lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/IndexSearcher.java (revision
10667
committed a fix in revision 1066764
simon
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> Seems like we don't respect segments that don't return hits for a
> certain query
>
> Index: lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/sea
Hey folks,
we had some issues / test failure with the newSearcher due to the
initial value of TopDocs#maxScore. It is initialized to NaN which
outrules anything if we do Math.max(current, topDocs.getMaxScore());
and topDocs.totalHits == 0. I added a conditional as a quickfix but I
think we should
I think we should even go one step further and make NaN an illegal
value for maxScore. I think we should add an assert in the setter and
the ctor. Objections?
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>> I think Float.NEG_I
#maxScore we should be fine. Can we do that on 3.x without
breaking anything - seems reasonable..
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> committed a fix in revision 1066764
>>
>> simon
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Simon Will
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> I think we should even go one step further and make NaN an illegal
>> value for maxScore. I think we should add an assert in the setter and
>> the ctor. Obj
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
>> Despite this, I propose we do a 'casual freeze' on the 3.x code base
>> in 7 days time, in other words we agree for a few weeks we will focus
>> on bugs and tests only in branch_3x and try
FYI - I am about to commit a fix for those failures.
The problem is that the settings for field sort scoring are not
propagated to the subs
Index: lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/IndexSearcher.java
===
--- lucene/src/java/o
ported to 3x in revision 1066904
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> committed a fix in revision 1066764
>
> simon
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> Seems like we don't respect segments that don't
Committed revision 1066904.
simon
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> FYI - I am about to commit a fix for those failures.
>
> The problem is that the settings for field sort scoring are not
> propagated to the subs
>
>
> Index: lucene/src/java/org
Hey,
great to see your intrest in helping lucene to move forward. Its an
amazing time to get started as we are moving very quickly development
wise right now. To get started it might be the easiest if you get
familiar with how we work and how apache works. The Contribution Guide
(http://wiki.apach
Hi Fernando,
I didn't follow this really but in general we fix stuff in trunk and
then backport to older versions. Usually if something is useful for
2.9 its also useful for 4.0 & 3.x if the issue still applies.
simon
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Fernando Wasylyszyn
wrote:
> Hi Doron. Thank
Welcome! ;)
Simon
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> Welcome Stanisław and Dawid!
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 1:13 PM
>> To: gene...@lucene.apache.org; dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Wel
Hey Toke,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> My low-memory sorting/faceting-hacking requires terms to be accessed by
> ordinals. With Lucene 4.0 I cannot depend on TermsEnums supporting ord()
> and seek(long), so the code switches to a cache that keeps track of
> every X te
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 16:00 +0100, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>> For all real codecs seek(BR, TermState) should be as fast as it gets.
>> There are some codecs which simply forward to seek(BR) so if you have
>> the TermSt
arts. Should I upload it somewhere?
>
> Implementation plan soon to follow.
>
> Sorry for the late reply; I have been rather busy these past few weeks.
>
> David
>
> On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 10:35:55 Simon Willnauer wrote:
>> Hey David,
>>
>> I
hmm maybe this was caused by LUCENE-2881 but I am not sure. I try to
dig this afternoon...
simon
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Apache Hudson Server
wrote:
> Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/1475/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:
> org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWr
As a reminder: the call for presentations of Berlin Buzzwords will
close next week on Tuesday, March 1st. Submissions on scalable search, data
storage and analysis are all welcome. We are looking for presentations on
the core technologies such as Apache Hadoop, CouchDB, Lucene, Redis,
Voldemort but
This is another indicator that we should really try to extract Solr's
capabilities like Faceting into modules! Solr should not be required
if you want to use the facteing stuff we already have.
simon
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Wouter Heijke wrote:
> Hi,
> Same here, don't want Solr, so if
wrote:
> I just ran this test locally ~15 times and no failure. Weird... I'll keep
> looking
>
> On 2/22/11 11:29 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>>
>> hmm maybe this was caused by LUCENE-2881 but I am not sure. I try to
>> dig this afternoon...
>>
>&
fails.
I need to run now - will look into this later again but it seems that
we should reopen LUCENE-2881 and see if we can somehow rollback in
such a situation or let the code which creates the file set the
property on FI.
simon
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> Mich
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 12:19 +0100, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>
> [Toke: Using a partial cache of BytesRef+TermState]
>
>> I don't know how you did implement that part but you might consider
>> using something
I am running this now for a while with no failure :(
mike can your reproduce?
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Uh-oh! I suspect this failure is from LUCENE-2881 -- the assert that
> tripped was verifying all merges were done w/ bulk copy. So, somehow,
> in this test
WTF - you got that running that test with while(true)?
hmm... weird. Not sure if it is related to 2881 though
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Hmmm beast hit a failure, but, a different one from the build:
>
> *** Thread: Lucene Merge Thread #1 ***
> org.apache.lucene
hey there,
a couple of days ago the trunk index format changed with LUCENE-2881
you should re-index any trunk indexes.
its likely if you open up old trunk indexes, you will get an
exception related to Read Past EOF.
Sorry for the delay!
simon
---
>
> On 2/26/11 9:09 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>> Alas no I cannot repro so far :(
>>
>> I tried the seed that failed, and I'm running while(1) on beast but no
>> failure so far gonna be a tricky one!!
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Sat
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Nedumaran wrote:
> Hi All,
> we have a need to store parent child relationship and query by both parent
> and children fields.
> while surfing the net, came across the presentation
> http://www.slideshare.net/MarkHarwood/proposal-for-nested-document-support-in-luc
nd I'm running while(1) on beast but no
>> failure so far gonna be a tricky one!!
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Simon Willnauer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am running this now for a while with no failure :(
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
> On 2/27/11 2:47 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Michael Busch
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, after LUCENE-2881 assigning the same fieldNumber to the same
>>> fi
FYI - I found the bug causing this problem in FieldInfos which caused
some field number to be swapped if a segment had gaps in its
numbering. I will add a test for this on LUCENE-2881 and upload a new
patch tomorrow.
I think I will let my machine run tests for a couple of days before we
commit LUC
hey there,
The changed in LUCENE-2881 caused some index corruption especially
when stored fields are used.
Due to that we reverted the changed made in LUCENE-2881 which changed
the index file format a couple of days ago.
If you are using trunk and update to a revision containing the
reverted cha
011 at 12:14 PM, David Nemeskey
wrote:
> Please find the implementation plan attached. The word "soon" gets a new
> meaning when power outages are taken into account. :)
>
> As before, comments are welcome.
>
> David
>
> On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 15:22:57 Simon Wi
quickly find the Lucene ones.
done on at least one ;)
simon
>
> Also, feel free to label existing bugs.
>
>
> On Mar 9, 2011, at 2:11 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>
>> Hey David and all others who want to contribute to GSoC,
>>
>> the ASF has applied for GSoC 2011
awesome thanks!
simon
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:54 AM, David Nemeskey
wrote:
> Ok, I have created a new issue, LUCENE-2959 for this project. I have uploaded
> the pdfs and added the gsoc2011 and lucene-gsoc-2011 labels as well.
>
> David
>
> On 2011 March 09, Wednesday 21:58:
Hey folks,
Google Summer of Code 2011 is very close and the Project Applications
Period has started recently. Now it's time to get some excited students
on board for this year's GSoC.
I encourage students to submit an application to the Google Summer of Code
web-application. Lucene & Solr are ama
Hey there,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:02 PM, wrote:
> I know Lucene , Solr and Nutch . I am also involved in such a project. Please
> guide me through any obstructions
This is great! Did you read the GSoC WikiPage here:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/SummerOfCode2011
If so do you are
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Ken O'Brien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone looking at GPU acceleration for Solr? If not, I'd like to
> contribute code which adds this functionality.
>
> As I'm not familiar with the codebase, does anyone know which areas of
> functionality could benefit from high degr
Hey,
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Zhijie Shen wrote:
> Hi developers,
>
> I'm a graduate student from National University of Singapore, majoring in
> Computer Science. The enthusiasm of open source and information retrieval
> drives me to participate in GSoC'11 with your community. I first go
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Simon these are great summaries -- can you post them on the issues too?
> Thanks!
done!
simon
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 5:
Hey folks,
I have recently tried to push some refactorings towards moving stuff
from Solr to modules land to enable users of Lucene to benefit from
the developments that have been made in Solr land during the past with
very little success. Actually, it was a really disappointing
experience wheneve
Hey folks,
if you are planning to become a mentor in 2011s GSoC you should likely read this
http://community.apache.org/guide-to-being-a-mentor.html
as well as this:
http://community.apache.org/mentee-ranking-process.html
for now Mike and myself have signed up for mentoring, anybody else?
Sim
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/2/2013 9:51 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
>>
>> Okay, I see the distinction now – Lucene/Solr themselves must be built
>> with Java 6, but apps that use them can be Java 6 or Java 7 (update 1 or
>> later). Got it.
>
>
> Because I'm using log4j
ok maybe updateing the JDK would be a good idea :)
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:46 PM, wrote:
> Build: builds.flonkings.com/job/Lucene-trunk-Linux-Java7-64-test-only/62737/
>
> No tests ran.
>
> Build Log:
> [...truncated 61 lines...]
-
keeping around 4 days of builds now at max 1000 builds
simon
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Or just configure flonkings to hold the logs longer. I know the
> defaults are bad for this: but you can change it to keep them for e.g.
> 3 days or something so that the disk space
Welcome Ryan!
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 11:27 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
>>
>> I'm pleased to announce that Ryan Ernst has accepted to join our ranks
>> as a committer.
>
>
> Congratulations and welcome!
>
> --
> Shawn
>
>
>
> --
sorry for the noise - I just added tasks for 4.x and 4.5.1 next to the
trunk task
simon
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:10 PM, wrote:
> Build: builds.flonkings.com/job/Lucene-4x-Linux-Java7-64-test-only/1/
>
> All tests passed
>
> Build Log:
> [...truncated 9772 lines...]
> ERROR: No artifacts found
upgraded ES to 4.5.1 and everything looks good
+1
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> +1
>
> smoke tester is happy (on win7+cygwin), docs and javadocs look good
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>>
>> Please vote to release the following artifacts:
>>
>
does this hold off 4.5.1? Mark any status on this?
simon
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Dawid Weiss
wrote:
> +1.
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Oct 24, 2013 6:52 AM, "Mark Miller" wrote:
>>>
>>> If someone doesn’t end up with an itch to push it faster,
scratch that! LOL thanks for doing 4.5.1
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> does this hold off 4.5.1? Mark any status on this?
>
> simon
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Dawid Weiss
> wrote:
>> +1.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at
hey folks,
I think it's time to get this going. Mark I can do the release as well
do we wanna set a date? IMO I'd love to start tomorrow but I guess I
will get some "I wanna get featrue XYZ in" emails so what about
cutting the RC next week Tuesday?
simon
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Otis Gos
Mark, I can do the release if you are busy or so I don't mind lemme
know if you wanna do it
simon
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Next Tuesday sounds good to me.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>>
>> hey folks
FYI I just started a release branch http://svn.apache.org/r1541081
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> Mark, I can do the release if you are busy or so I don't mind lemme
> know if you wanna do it
>
> simon
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Mark
>> @@ -154,6 +154,9 @@ Optimizations
>> * LUCENE-4854: Speed up TermsEnum of FieldCache.getDocTermOrds.
>>(Robert Muir)
>>
>> +* LUCENE-4857: Don't unnecessarily copy stem override map in
>> + StemmerOverrideFilter. (Simon Willnauer)
>> +
>>
nice one!
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> Something for automata freaks ;) Don't know if it's going to be faster than
> Java's intrinsics (with the bounds checking and backbuffer referencing) but
> it's definitely elegant, huh? :)
>
> Dawid
>
> -- Forwarded message
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> The wiki at http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ has come under attack by
> spammers more frequently of late, so the PMC has decided to lock it down in
> an attempt to reduce the work involved in tracking and removing spam.
>
> From now on, onl
thanks mike!
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> I'll fix ...
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server
> wrote:
>> Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/4823/
>> Java: 32
Upgrade ES to 4.2.1 - all tests pass
+1
thanks mark for rolling this release!
simon
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_2_1r1460810/
>
> Thanks for voting!
>
> Smoke tester passes for me,
>
> +1.
>
> --
> - Mark
>
>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> I just wanted to mention: Smoke-Tester does not detect the problems, as it
> does not check links to the oracle homepage.
>
> Maybe we should add a check to smoketester that checks all
> META-INF/manifest.mf files that they contain "1.6" (
moved ES to the new RC + run smoke tester
+1 - thanks mark
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> +1
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_2_1r14
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>> Is that a +1 ? :)
>
> That's a good question. I didn't want to +1 in order to make the
> counting easier since I have no binding vote (not being in Lucene
> PMC). Or does Lucene allow an
welcome! :)
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Welcome!
>
> On Mar 28, 2013 7:16 PM, "Steve Rowe" wrote:
>>
>> I'm pleased to announce that Adrien Grand has accepted the PMC's
>> invitation to join.
>>
>> Welcome Adrien!
>>
>> - Steve
>> ---
+1 thanks mark
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I'm experimenting with an event driven commit bot today. It should mean
> much lower latency for tagging, and less room for accidentally tagging old
> commits. If today goes well, I'll look at setting things up on a more
> perma
welcome
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> Welcome Shalin!
>
> koji
>
>
> (13/04/05 3:24), Steve Rowe wrote:
>>
>> I'm pleased to announce that Shalin Shekhar Mangar has accepted the PMC's
>> invitation to join.
>>
>> Welcome Shalin!
>>
>> - Steve
>>
I think david is just running into a situation were his test fail
sometimes with random seeds but always if he forces RAMDirectory no
matter what seed.
He is asking for advice if there are any traps with ram dir in
randomized testing...
maybe that helps
@David S.: why don't you paste a patch that
Folks,
I started a release branch for Lucene / Solr 4.3
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_3/
I will update the 4.x branch now and build the first RC
simon
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> 4.3 is looking good already. If nobody has spun a r
ks, then less than a week later you say, I'm
> rolling now? Can't we at least have a day or two notice to wrap?
>
> - Mark
>
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > I started a release branch for Lucene / Solr 4.
dude you had 12 days since rob send the note to the list. what are you
talking about?
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>
> > honestly I don't think we should push in last minute changes by s
. I
> > doubt he wants to do shoving, instead I think these activities
> contribute to
> > a quality release.
> >
> > So i'd recommend just keeping the release branch as is, give a few more
> days
> > for additional bugfixes/docs/tests, but restrict the branc
ention.
thanks,
simon
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> 4.3... are we there yet? How much longer?!
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Otis Gospodnetic
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:43 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org ; Simon Wi
ous bug the vote fails. everything else will be
in a subsequent release.
simon
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Otis Gospodnetic
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:43 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org ; Simon Willnauer
> Subject: Re: 4.3
>
> Thin
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>
> > here is my family hand holding. (btw. I think the analogy is bogus but
> that is my personal opinion and I stated my points here)
> >
> > I will u
@rob you can add the fix too if you want that is fine I will roll another
release anyways
simon
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> I'll open an issue. We should at least fix the test for 4.3 if possible
> (the indexsearcher change can wait)
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:19
3:24 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> > cool, i opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4938
> >
> > We should still have explicit tests for this, and there is still the
> mystery
> > of how this test ever passed at all!
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 201
WOOT
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:33 PM, wrote:
> Author: mikemccand
> Date: Wed Apr 17 19:33:48 2013
> New Revision: 1469040
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1469040
> Log:
> prompt for GPG password up front
>
> Modified:
> lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py
I started with the lucene release notes here:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote43
please feel free to add to is as needed!
aside of this I'd really appreciate some help with the solr part, mark can
you help with that?
simon
this is a test bug... I will commit a fix in a bit
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Apache Jenkins Server <
jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-java7/1164/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.join.TestBlockJoin.testEm
http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC1-rev1469340/
Thanks everybody for the hard work!
Smoke tester says: SUCCESS!
Integration into ES is successful!
there is my +1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns
. I never said "fuck you and your
objections"
my $0.05
simon
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> the warning has been given 6 days ago. I am just answering the rough tone
>
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
> > Steve,
> >
> > I didn't put a "we're releasing now bomb" in, I said:
> >
> > "I started a release branch for Lucene / Solr
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
>
> On Apr 19, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> >
> >> On Apr 19, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
> >> > I didn'
ah man, good call! that is my fault. I know what went wrong here. Damned!
ok that means I need to respin that one. This might take a while on my end.
sorry about that.
simon
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> :
> http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-s
@uwe sure!
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Can we fix changes.txt before that?
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> Simon Willnauer schrieb:
>
>> ah man, good call! that is my fault. I know what went wrong here. Damned!
>>
>> ok that means I
; On Apr 19, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> >> On Apr 19, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> >>>
> >>&
thanks uwe... let me know I will run a new RC once you are done
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Will fix soon!
>
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> Simon Willnauer schrieb:
>>
>> @uwe sure!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:48 P
; Uwe Schindler
>
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>
> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
> From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 11:24 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> Subjec
401 - 500 of 2845 matches
Mail list logo
