Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4

+1 SUCCESS! [1:07:20.700731] On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 7:03 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [3:08:50.803948] > > I ran the smoktester with JDK 21.0.x, 22.0.x, and 23. Hence the long run > time :-) > > -Chris. > > > On 10 Oct 2024, at 08:24, Luca Cavanna wrote: > > > > Please vote for r

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:46:57.466093] On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 11:43 AM Michael Sokolov wrote: > um, +1 > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 10:39 AM Michael Sokolov > wrote: > > > > SUCCESS! [1:24:53.393070] > > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 9:43 AM Benjamin Trent > wrote: > > > > > > +1 SUCCESS! [0:56:38.403983] >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.11.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:10:51.244392] On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 11:20 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:35.855891] > > -Chris. > > > > On 25 Jun 2024, at 09:27, Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:33.092957] > > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 4:22 PM Michael Sokolov > wrote: > > SUCCESS

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.11.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:12:30.029470] On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 9:22 AM Bruno Roustant wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:41:14.593265] > > Bruno > >>

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

SGTM! +1 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:04 AM Patrick Zhai wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 9:34 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > >> >> I'm fine with this requirement. >> >> +1. >> >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:24 PM Chris Hegarty >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Since the discussion on bumping the Luc

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.10.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:22:54.621515] On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 7:13 AM Robert Muir wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 9:54 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > My Python knowledge is too limited to fix the build script to allow to > test the smoker with arbitrary JAVA_HOME dircetories next to the b

Re: Welcome Stefan Vodita as Lucene committter

Congratulations Stefan! On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:45 AM Anshum Gupta wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Stefan! > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 7:55 AM Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> I'm pleased to announce that Stefan Vodita has accepted the Lucene

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.9.0 RC2

SUCCESS! [0:52:49.337126] +1 On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 12:05 PM Benjamin Trent wrote: > SUCCESS! [0:44:05.132154] > > +1 > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 1:09 PM Chris Hegarty > wrote: > >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.9.0 >> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> >> ht

Re: Welcome Patrick Zhai to the Lucene PMC

Welcome, Patrick! On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 3:56 PM Gus Heck wrote: > Welcome :) > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 1:15 PM Anshum Gupta > wrote: > >> Congratulations and welcome, Patrick! >> >> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 12:05 PM Michael McCandless < >> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >> >>> I'm happy t

Re: Welcome Guo Feng to the Lucene PMC

Congratulations Feng! On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 4:02 AM Guo Feng wrote: > Thanks all. It is a great honor to join the PMC! > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h.

Re: Welcome Luca Cavanna to the Lucene PMC

Congratulations Luca! On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 10:51 AM Michael Sokolov wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Luca! > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 1:42 PM Julie Tibshirani > wrote: > > > > Congratulations Luca!! > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 1:45 AM Bruno Roustant > wrote: > >> > >> Welcome, con

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.8.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:49:28.203159] On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 7:44 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:58.932481] > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 4:18 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I verified the release with the usual tools and my workflow: > > > > Policeman Jenkins ran smoketester fo

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.7.0 RC1

Thanks Adrien! SUCCESS! [0:43:17.143555] +1 On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 7:37 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.7.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.7.0-RC1-rev-ccf4b198ec328095d45d2746189dc8c

Re: Welcome Chris Hegarty to the Lucene PMC

Congratulations, Chris! On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 11:43 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > Welcome, Chris. > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:53 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> I'm pleased to announce that Chris Hegarty has accepted an invitation to >> join the Lucene PMC! >> >> Congratulations Chris, and welc

Re: Lucene 9.7 release

+1 Thanks Adrien On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 9:19 AM Michael McCandless wrote: > +1, thanks Adrien! > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 12:11 PM Patrick Zhai wrote: > >> +1, thank you Adrien! >> >> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023, 09:08 Adrien Grand wrote: >> >>>

Re: Lucene PMC Chair Greg Miller

Thanks Bruno! and Congratulations Greg! On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:49 AM Patrick Zhai wrote: > Thank you Bruno and Greg! > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023, 10:40 Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > >> Thank you, Bruno. Congratulations, Greg. >> >> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 8:16 PM Bruno Roustant >> wrote: >> >>> Hell

Re: Welcome Luca Cavanna as Lucene committer

Congratulations Luca!! On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 2:19 PM Vigya Sharma wrote: > Congratulations Luca! And welcome... > > Vigya > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 3:36 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > >> Welcome Luca. This was long overdue. 👍 >> >> Am 5. Oktober 2022 19:03:43 MESZ schrieb Adrien Grand > >: >>> >>>

Re: Welcome Vigya Sharma as Lucene committer

Congrats Vigya!! On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 5:35 AM Michael Gibney wrote: > Welcome, Vigya! > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 12:35 PM Houston Putman wrote: > > > > Welcome Vigya! > > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 11:38 AM Alan Woodward > wrote: > >> > >> Congratulations and welcome, Vigya! > >> > >> - Alan

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.2 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:02:16.559513] On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 12:07 PM Mike Drob wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.11.2 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.11.2-RC2-rev17dee71932c683e345508113523e764c3e4c8

Re: Welcome Guo Feng as Lucene committer

Welcome Feng! On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 1:47 PM Houston Putman wrote: > Congrats Feng! > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:31 AM Michael Gibney > wrote: > >> Welcome, Feng! >> >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 2:23 PM Mayya Sharipova >> wrote: >> >>> Welcome and congratulations, Feng! >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 26

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.10.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:11:35.593338] On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 11:41 AM Anshum Gupta wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Smoke tester passed w/ JDK 8. > > SUCCESS! [1:18:04.585401] > > Also tried a basic app w/ indexing and search and everything I tested > worked as expected. > > Thanks for doing this, Mayya! > >

Re: Welcome Greg Miller as Lucene committer

Congrats Greg!! On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 9:37 AM Gautam Worah wrote: > Congratulations Greg :) > > On Mon, May 31, 2021, 8:02 AM Ilan Ginzburg wrote: > >> Congrats Greg! >> >> On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 4:35 PM Greg Miller wrote: >> >>> Thanks everyone! I'm honored to have been nominated and look

Re: Welcome Zach Chen as Lucene committer

Welcome Zach! On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:38 PM Greg Miller wrote: > Congrats Zach! > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:09 PM Robert Muir wrote: > > > > Congratulations! > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:14 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> > >> I'm pleased to announce that Zach Chen has accepted the P

Re: Welcome Peter Gromov as Lucene committer

Welcome Peter! On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 12:13 PM Houston Putman wrote: > Congrats! > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 12:47 PM Anshum Gupta > wrote: > >> Congratulations and welcome, Peter! >> >> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:48 AM Robert Muir wrote: >> >>> I'm pleased to announce that Peter Gromov has acce

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

Mike, I'd like to backport SOLR-15216 (UI Fix) On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:55 AM Mike Drob wrote: > Ignacio, Alan - I have looked at the patches and these should be safe to > backport and useful in a bugfix. Please go ahead and commit, and update > CHANGES entry as well. > > Cassandra - yes, I pl

Re: Welcome Bruno to the Apache Lucene PMC

Welcome Bruno! On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:59 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > Welcome, Bruno! > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 4:29 PM Gus Heck wrote: > > > > Welcome :) > > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 9:58 AM Houston Putman > wrote: > >> > >> Congrats and welcome Bruno! > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:3

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Windows (64bit/jdk-13.0.2) - Build # 9738 - Still Unstable!

Most likely due to SOLR-15154 , I'll take a look On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 4:21 PM Policeman Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/9738/ > Java: 64bit/jdk-13.0.2 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UsePara

Re: Removal of Apache HttpComponents/HttpClient for 9.0?

+1 David > Oh I see; there are entanglements with Solr's authentication plugins Maybe we should move the authentication plugins to contribs (don't know if we'll need one or two, one for client-side and one for server-side? I haven't looked much at the code). Plus, we are shipping with multiple auth

Re: Congratulations to the new Apache Solr PMC Chair, Jan Høydahl!

Congratulations Jan! On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:56 AM Anshum Gupta wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I’d like to inform everyone that the newly formed Apache Solr PMC > nominated and elected Jan Høydahl for the position of the Solr PMC Chair > and Vice President. This decision was approved by the board

Re: Congratulations to the new Lucene PMC Chair, Michael Sokolov!

Congratulations Mike! On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 2:42 PM Steve Rowe wrote: > Congrats Mike! > > -- > Steve > > > On Feb 17, 2021, at 4:31 PM, Anshum Gupta > wrote: > > > > Every year, the Lucene PMC rotates the Lucene PMC chair and Apache Vice > President position. > > > > This year we nominated a

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.1 RC2

SUCCESS! [1:07:31.079810] Tested upgrading from 8.7 and saw no problems +1 (binding) On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 2:58 AM Noble Paul wrote: > SUCCESS! [1:04:46.520370] > > +1 Binding > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 1:44 PM Timothy Potter > wrote: > > > > And I continue to struggle with the python3 com

Re: 8.8.1 release soon

I'd like to get SOLR-15114 in. It already has a patch that I'm testing, I'll try to merge it today. On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 8:23 AM Timothy Potter wrote: > Hi Ishan, > > Please let me know how SOLR-15138 is looking on Friday and we can make a >

Re: [Reminder] SOLR-15114: WAND does not work correctly on multiple segments in Solr 8.6.3

Thanks, I missed the Jira issue completely. I’ll take a look. On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 6:40 PM Naoto Minami wrote: > Hi, > > I found and fixed a bug of WAND algorithm in Solr. As stated in the > contributing manual, > > > If no one responds to your patch after a few days, please make friendly > re

Re: [DISCUSS] ConfigSet ZK to file system fallback

y.json" is an exception and should live in ZooKeeper (and never locally) for the config API to work, but having just "default to local when a file is not in ZooKeeper" just confuses things IMO. On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 8:38 PM David Smiley wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:27 PM Tomá

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2

It’s 9 binding: Noble, Tim, me, Ignacio, Mike M, Namgyu, Atri, Anshum and Mike S. 1 non-binding: Haoyu On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:34 AM Michael Sokolov wrote: > SUCCESS! [0:58:25.213071] > > +1 better late than never? > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:04 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > wrote: > > > > Tha

Re: [DISCUSS] ConfigSet ZK to file system fallback

Thanks for bringing this up, David. I thought about this same situation before, but I think I never convinced myself in one way or another :p. As I mentioned in many other emails, I think the infrastructure and the node configuration (such as solr.xml) needs to be local (at least, needs to be able

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2

Thanks Noble! And thanks for fixing that concurrency issue, I'd hit it but didn't have time to investigate it. +1 SUCCESS! [0:58:32.036482] On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:19 AM Timothy Potter wrote: > Thanks Noble! > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:24:28.212370] (my internet is super slow today) > > Re-ran all th

Re: Separate git repo(s) for Solr modules

Agere with Houston 100%. I think it's a good idea to have an official repo for things that are related to Solr and, at the same time, don't belong within the Solr codebase such as the prometheus exporter or, eventually, the cross-dc work that Anshum is working on (once it "graduates" from sandbox I

Re: [DISCUSS] SIP-12: Incremental Backup and Restore

Thanks Jason! This is great, and a very much needed feature. > This helps to avoid confusion that would > otherwise arise between identically named files when e.g. a shard > leader changes between two incremental backups. (I'll try to expand > on this in the SIP, as it's a bit hard to give the fu

Re: Welcome Houston Putman to the PMC

Welcome Houston!! On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:28 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Houston! > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:19 PM Mike Drob wrote: > >> I am pleased to announce that Houston Putman has accepted the PMC's >> invitation to join. >> >> Congratulations and welcome, Hou

Re: Welcome Julie Tibshirani as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Julie! On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 6:59 PM Ilan Ginzburg wrote: > Welcome Julie and congrats! > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 3:51 AM Julie Tibshirani > wrote: > >> Thank you for the warm welcome! It’s a big honor for me -- I’ve been a >> Lucene fan since the start of my software career. I’m ex

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.7.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:03:01.296851] On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:05 PM Nhat Nguyen wrote: > +1 (binding) > SUCCESS! [0:53:20.894728] > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 1:50 PM Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> SUCCESS! [0:45:49.703726] >> >> Mike McCandless >> >> http:

Re: Index documents in async way

Interesting idea Đạt. The first questions/comments that come to my mind would be: * Atomic updates, can those be supported? I guess yes if we can guarantee that messages are read once and only once. * I'm guessing we'd need to read messages in an ordered way, so it'd be a single Kafka partition per

Re: Solr Alpha (EA) release of Reference Branch

gt; > I disagree, Noble. Having a docker image us going to be useful to > some clients, with complex usecases. Great point, David! > >>> > > >>> > On Tue, 6 Oct, 2020, 1:09 pm Ishan Chattopadhyaya, < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.6.3 RC1

+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [1:05:14.591357] On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:13 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: > +1 (binding) > > SUCCESS! [1:00:37.423566] > > Tried basic indexing and search and ran the smoke tester. > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 6:53 PM Jason Gerlowski > wrote: > >> Please vote for release candidat

Re: Solr Alpha (EA) release of Reference Branch

I was thinking (and I haven’t flushed it out completely but will throw the idea) that an alternative approach with this timeline could be to cut 9x branch around November/December? And then you could merge into master, it would have the latest changes from master plus the ref branch changes. >From

Re: Solr Alpha (EA) release of Reference Branch

> I think the Solr 4 alpha/beta situation was different -- it was not some fork a committer was maintaining; it was the master branch of its time, and it was destined to be the very next release, not some possible future release. Agree, 4’s alpha/beta was a very different situation. > I believe i

Re: Solr Alpha (EA) release of Reference Branch

I'm glad to see efforts to merge the reference branch changes into master. I do agree with the previous comments that calling it "Solr 10" (even with the "-alpha") would confuse users, maybe use "reference"? or maybe something in reference to SOLR-14788? Don't know what's the issue with the package

Re: restlet dependencies

> Let's support the single file upload feature +1, but let this behave exactly as a zip file with a single file in it (regarding trusted/untrusted). We just need to change the configset handler to be able to handle non-zip files, and have a way to "locate" that file inside the configset (in case it

Re: restlet dependencies

s/blob/master/smui/conf/smui2solrcloud.sh#L37 > > On Sep 23, 2020, at 11:57 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe > wrote: > > > Hmmm; seems the configSet API doesn't have an API to update a single > file! I wonder if uploading a configSet to the same name effectively > overwrites newly

Re: restlet dependencies

> Hmmm; seems the configSet API doesn't have an API to update a single file! I wonder if uploading a configSet to the same name effectively overwrites newly updated files but does not delete the existing files? I've been working on this recently. As of 8.7, the UPLOAD command supports overwriting

Re: Our test failure rate is unacceptable.

sonally > > mind if somebody did it for me. > > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 9:06 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe > > wrote: > > > > > > Sometimes Jenkins may take hours to take your commit, may fail in the > middle of your night, may not fail consistently, etc. T

Re: Our test failure rate is unacceptable.

es all the > time-pressure off of getting out a fix. Why work under the gun when > you don't have to? > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 1:14 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe > wrote: > > > > I believe these failures are associated to > https://issues

Re: Our test failure rate is unacceptable.

I believe these failures are associated to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14151 • FAILED: org.apache.solr.pkg.TestPackages.classMethod • FAILED: org.apache.solr.schema.PreAnalyzedFieldManagedSchemaCloudTest.testAdd2Fields • FAILED: org.apache.solr.schema.ManagedSchemaRoundRobinCloudTe

Re: Github PR Actions

I think this is a good idea. In general, I'm +1 on improving PR validations as much as possible, and as Houston says, we can always remove them later if it's not helping. I also agree with David in his Jira comment that even more important than this is to have the tests running on Jenkins, but I do

Re: Code Analysis during CI?

Thanks Tom. I think this could be very useful as long as it can be configurable. (The "terms of use here[1] link to "google.com", so I couldn't check that, but they claim it's free for public repos, so...). We could always try it and remove it if we don't like it? What do others think? [1] https:

Re: Solr configuration options

just use Solr the way I think about it ;) > > > On Sep 3, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe > wrote: > > > > I can see that some of these configurations should be moved to > clusterporps.json, I don’t believe this is the case for all of them. Some > are configurati

Re: Solr configuration options

I can see that some of these configurations should be moved to clusterporps.json, I don’t believe this is the case for all of them. Some are configurations that are targeting the local node (i.e sharedLib path), some are needed before connecting to ZooKeeper (zk config). Configuration of global han

Re: With ant removed, will GitHub PR job always fail 1st check?

I have this PR to remove the ant action: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1798 On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 6:58 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > For the Pull Request, GitHub is running both Ant and Gradle precommit. > > > > Now that ant is gone, it is probably safe to remove that check as

Re: Solr configuration options

g/competent to make AMI/dockers/etc ... and one has to manage > versions of those variants as opposed to managing versions of config files. > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 1:55 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe < > tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think if you are using AM

Re: Solr configuration options

I think if you are using AMIs (or Docker), you could put the node configuration inside the AMI (or Docker image), as Ilan said, together with the binaries. Say you have a custom top-level handler (Collections, Cores, Info, whatever), which takes some arguments and it's configured in solr.xml and yo

Re: Solr configuration options

I think of it exactly as Jan described it. solr.xml is the node configuration, usually should be the same for all the cluster, but not necessarily all the time (i.e. during a deployment they may differ). Putting it in ZooKeeper is, I believe, a mistake, because then you see a file up there, but it’

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 RC1

+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [1:03:21.542868] On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:35 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > > > +1 Binding from my side. > > > > Results: > > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/34/console > > > > Works with Java 8 and later. > > I did not fully check everything

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 bugfix release

Hi, I'm about to backport SOLR-14751 . It's a trivial fix for the ZooKeeper UI On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:03 AM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > +1, thanks Simon. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > >

Re: Welcome Atri Sharma to the PMC

Welcome, Atri! On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 2:50 PM Jitendra soni wrote: > Welcome Atri! > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 3:18 AM Nhat Nguyen > wrote: > >> Welcome Atri! >> >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 5:47 PM Gus Heck wrote: >> >>> Welcome! :) >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 4:44 PM jim ferenczi >>> wro

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.6.1 RC2

Late, but +1 SUCCESS! [1:02:21.504688] On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:06 PM Houston Putman wrote: > It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: > > +1 8 (5 binding) > 0 0 > -1 0 > > This vote has PASSED > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:13 AM Anshum Gupta > wrote: > >> Thanks fo

Re: Badapple report

Hi Erick, I've introduced and later fixed a bug in TestConfig. It hasn't failed since, so please don't annotate it. On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 7:47 AM Erick Erickson wrote: > We’re backsliding some. I encourage people to look at: > http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/failure-report.html, we have

Re: Standardize Leading Test or Trailing Test

+1 On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 10:37 PM David Smiley wrote: > +1 to standardize on something. > This has been brought up before: LUCENE-8626 > -- credit to > Christine who started the work. I recommend resuming the discussion there. > > ~ David > >

Re: Welcome Munendra SN to the PMC

Congrats and Welcome! On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 9:25 AM Steve Rowe wrote: > Congrats and welcome, Munendra! > > -- > Steve > > > On Aug 2, 2020, at 7:19 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I am pleased to announce that Munendra SN has accepted the PMC's > invitati

Re: Welcome Gus Heck to the PMC

Welcome, Gus!! On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 9:27 AM Steve Rowe wrote: > Congrats and welcome, Gus! > > -- > Steve > > > On Aug 2, 2020, at 7:20 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I am pleased to announce that Gus Heck has accepted the PMC's invitation > to join. > >

Re: Welcome Namgyu Kim to the PMC

Welcome! On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 9:50 PM Christian Moen wrote: > Congrats, Namgyu! > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:19 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am pleased to announce that Namgyu Kim has accepted the PMC's >> invitation to join. >> >> Congratulations and we

Re: Deprecate Schemaless Mode?

Agree with Jason. It's useful for prototyping and developing. I remember seeing some warnings about it (in the logs?), but maybe we need more? On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:41 AM Jason Gerlowski wrote: > > Is anyone on this list using schemaless mode in production or have you > tried to? > > Schemal

Re: Welcome Mike Drob to the PMC

Welcome Mike!! On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 3:51 PM Martin Gainty wrote: > Congratulation Mike! > martin > > -- > *From:* Erick Erickson > *Sent:* Friday, July 24, 2020 4:55 PM > *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Welcome Mike Drob to the PMC > > Welcome Mike!

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.6.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:04:02.550893] On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 12:36 PM Michael Sokolov wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:59:20.777306] > > (tested on Graviton ARM processor) > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:10 PM Anshum Gupta > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > SUCCESS! [1:15:03.975368] > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 1:5

Re: 8.6 release

gt; ~ David >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 2:52 PM Cassandra Targett < >>>> casstarg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I started looking at the Ref Guide for 8.6 to get it ready, and notice >>>>> the

Re: Welcome Michael Sokolov to the PMC

Welcome, Michael! On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 9:08 AM Namgyu Kim wrote: > Congratulations, Michael! :D > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 7:22 PM Mayya Sharipova > wrote: > >> Congratulations, Michael! >> >> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 4:30 PM Michael McCandless < >> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >> >>> Welc

Re: Welcome Tomoko Uchida to the PMC

Welcome Tomoko! On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 9:08 AM Namgyu Kim wrote: > Congratulations, Tomoko! :D > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:27 PM Steve Rowe wrote: > >> Welcome and congrats Tomoko! >> >> -- >> Steve >> >> > On Jul 4, 2020, at 2:26 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: >> > >> > I am pleased to announce

Re: 8.6 release

n 24, 2020 at 2:52 PM Cassandra Targett >> wrote: >> >>> I started looking at the Ref Guide for 8.6 to get it ready, and notice >>> there are no Upgrade Notes in `solr-upgrade-notes.adoc` for 8.6. Is it >>> really true that none are needed at all? >>>

Re: Welcome Ilan Ginzburg as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Ilan! On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 12:26 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Ilan! > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 2:44 AM Noble Paul wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Please join me in welcoming Ilan Ginzburg as the latest Lucene/Solr >> committer. >> Ilan, it's tradition for you to i

Re: 8.6 release

+1. Thanks Bruno On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:22 AM Mike Drob wrote: > +1 > > The release wizard python script should be sufficient for everything. If > you run into any issues with it, let me know, I used it for 8.5.2 and think > I understand it pretty well. > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:31 AM Bru

Re: Welcome Mayya Sharipova as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Mayya! On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 10:53 AM Paul Sanwald wrote: > Congratulations Mayya > > --paul > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Congrats Mayya! >> >> On Mon, 8 Jun, 2020, 11:20 pm Alan Woodward, >> wrote: >> >>> Congra

Re: BadApple report

Thanks for keeping an eye Erick. I took a quick look at the "TestIndexSearcher" failures and I think they're related to SOLR-14525. Should be fixed after this[1] commit by Noble. [1] https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=5827ddf On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 7:52 AM Erick Erickson wro

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.2 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:05:23.582468] On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 5:51 AM Andrzej Białecki wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:59:25.055394] > > (this slow smoke test time comes from a combination of running this on a > relatively wimpy replacement MacBook and a slow network). > > On 23 May 2020, at 09:39, Shalin S

Re: [DISCUSS] 8.5.2 Release?

Done. On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 1:49 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > Mike, I'm about to merge https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14471 > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:51 AM Mike Drob wrote: > >> Thanks for pointing those commits out to me, Noble. I cherry

Re: [DISCUSS] 8.5.2 Release?

Mike, I'm about to merge https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14471 On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:51 AM Mike Drob wrote: > Thanks for pointing those commits out to me, Noble. I cherry-picked the > doap and backcompat index changes to branch_8 and master. > > As for the releases... > > mdrob-i

Re: [VOTE] Solr to become a top-level Apache project (TLP)

-1 (binding)

Re: [DISCUSS] 8.5.2 Release?

+1. Thanks Mike On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:55 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 > > Le jeu. 7 mai 2020 à 19:13, Mike Drob a écrit : > >> Devs, >> >> I know that we had 8.5.1 only a few weeks ago, but with the fix for >> LUCENE-9350 I think we should consider another bug-fix. I know that without >> it I

Re: [DISCUSS] Lucene-Solr split (Solr promoted to TLP)

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:37 PM Dawid Weiss wrote: > > I read “promotion to TLP” as if this was some achievement that needs to > be celebrated now. > > I honestly believe it is an achievement for a project to receive > top-level status. It's a sign of having a community of users, > committers and

Re: [DISCUSS] Lucene-Solr split (Solr promoted to TLP)

I don’t agree with the argument “Solr outgrew being a subproject of Lucene”. I read “promotion to TLP” as if this was some achievement that needs to be celebrated now. Solr didn’t become a TLP years ago because the decision then was to merge with Lucene development, thinking they would progress bet

Re: Welcome Eric Pugh as a Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Eric! On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:12 AM Houston Putman wrote: > Congrats Eric! > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:57 AM Eric Pugh > wrote: > >> Thank you everyone! I’ll keep it short, otherwise this will be a very >> long email… ;-). >> >> I was first introduced to Solr and Lucene by Erik Hatch

Re: Welcome Alessandro Benedetti as a Lucene/Solr committer

Congrats and welcome Alessandro! On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 9:34 AM Erick Erickson wrote: > Welcome Alessandro! > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020, 10:32 Houston Putman > wrote: > >> Congrats Alessandro! >> >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 10:07 AM Tommaso Teofili < >> tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> wel

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:20:34.327672] On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:59 PM Kevin Risden wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:24:43.574849] > > Kevin Risden > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 3:40 PM Nhat Nguyen > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > SUCCESS! [0:52:39.991003] > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:14 AM Cassandra Targett

Re: Welcome Nhat Nguyen to the PMC

Welcome Nhat! On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 11:19 AM Anshum Gupta wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Nhat! > > -Anshum > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 8:34 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> I am pleased to announce that Nhat Nguyen has accepted the PMC's >> invitation to join. >> >> Welcome Nhat! >> >> -- >>

Re: Custom Solr Collector

Hi Kyle, For #2, I understand you need this because you want "min-visited-docs", right? Because, for max you could use EarlyTerminatingSortingCollector? (or Lucene's "HitsThresholdChecker", but I don't know if Solr has support for this yet). The "min-visited" would override the "timeAllowed", so ev

Re: Congratulations to the new Lucene/Solr PMC Chair, Anshum Gupta!

Congrats Anshum!! On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 2:25 PM David Smiley wrote: > Congrats Anshum! > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 4:15 PM Cassandra Targett > wrote: > >> Every year, the Lucene PMC rotates th

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.4.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:23:00.750081] On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 9:17 AM David Smiley wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:26:31.334270] > > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 11:00 AM Tommaso Teofili < > tommaso.teof...@gmai

Re: Commit / Code Review Policy

Thank you for putting this up, David. While I see Rob’s points, I agree with the proposal in general, and as you and Jan said, this is not too far from what happens today, at least in Lucene-world. > Then change the document's name to be Recommendation instead of Policy! Maybe guidelines? The doc

Re: BadApple

I’ve been working with TestTlogReplica, please don’t change that one On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:28 AM Erick Erickson wrote: > Short form: > > Holding reasonably steady, except: > > PackageManagerCLITest.testPackeageManager is failing over 50% of the time. > > MoverReplicaHDFSTest.test failing ove

Re: Welcome Houston Putman as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Houston! On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:09 AM Kevin Risden wrote: > Congrats and welcome! > > Kevin Risden > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019, 12:05 Jason Gerlowski wrote: > >> Congratulations! >> >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:58 AM Gus Heck wrote: >> > >> > Congratulations and welcome :) >> > >> > O

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-BadApples-Tests-8.x - Build # 261 - Still Unstable

I pushed a fix for this On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 5:17 PM Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-BadApples-Tests-8.x/261/ > > 1 tests failed. > FAILED: > org.apache.solr.util.SolrPluginUtilsTest.testMinShouldMatchBadQueries > > Er

  1   2   3   >