Just resolved SOLR-14590. On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 4:22 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll take a look today, Bruno. Thanks. > > On Mon, 6 Jul, 2020, 4:32 pm Bruno Roustant, <bruno.roust...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> 8.6 RC is planned tomorrow but there are still 9 Jira issues unresolved >> for 8.6 (+ private ones?) >> >> Please review and update their status. >> >> 3 blockers >> SOLR-14599 Introduce cluster level plugins through packages >> SOLR-14593 Package store API to disable file upload over HTTP >> SOLR-14580 CloudSolrClient cannot be initialized using 'zkHosts' builder >> >> Other >> SOLR-14590 Add support for FeatureField in Solr >> SOLR-14516 NPE during Realtime GET >> SOLR-14422 Solr 8.5 Admin UI shows Angular placeholders on first load / >> refresh >> SOLR-14398 package store PUT should be idempotent >> SOLR-14311 Shared schema should not have access to core level classes >> LUCENE-9356 Add tests for corruptions caused by byte flips >> >> Le dim. 5 juil. 2020 à 08:10, David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> a >> écrit : >> >>> Pertaining to the highlighter performance regression: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14628 >>> It's a simple change in a default setting, that is furthermore >>> consistent with how the behavior was prior to Solr 8.5 >>> >>> I'm hoping this can make it into the release? See the PR. >>> >>> ~ David >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 3:05 PM David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks starting this discussion, Cassandra. >>>> >>>> I reviewed the issues I was involved with and I don't quite see >>>> something worth noting. >>>> >>>> I plan to add a note about a change in defaults within >>>> UnifiedHighlighter that could be a significant perf regression. This >>>> wasn't introduced in 8.6 but introduced in 8.5 and it's significant enough >>>> to bring attention to. I could add it in 8.5's section but then add a >>>> short pointer to it in 8.6. >>>> >>>> ~ David >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 2:52 PM Cassandra Targett < >>>> casstarg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I started looking at the Ref Guide for 8.6 to get it ready, and notice >>>>> there are no Upgrade Notes in `solr-upgrade-notes.adoc` for 8.6. Is it >>>>> really true that none are needed at all? >>>>> >>>>> I’ll add what I usually do about new features/changes that maybe >>>>> wouldn’t normally make the old Upgrade Notes section, I just find it >>>>> surprising that there weren’t any devs who thought any of the 100 or so >>>>> Solr changes warrant any user caveats. >>>>> On Jun 17, 2020, 12:27 PM -0500, Tomás Fernández Löbbe < >>>>> tomasflo...@gmail.com>, wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1. Thanks Bruno >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:22 AM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> The release wizard python script should be sufficient for everything. >>>>>> If you run into any issues with it, let me know, I used it for 8.5.2 and >>>>>> think I understand it pretty well. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:31 AM Bruno Roustant < >>>>>> bruno.roust...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It’s been a while since we released Lucene/Solr 8.5. >>>>>>> I’d like to volunteer to be a release manager for an 8.6 release. If >>>>>>> there's agreement, then I plan to cut the release branch two weeks >>>>>>> today, >>>>>>> on June 30th, and then to build the first RC two days later. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This will be my first time as release manager so I'll probably need >>>>>>> some guidance. Currently I have two resource links on this subject: >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/ReleaseTodo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/master/dev-tools/scripts#releasewizardpy >>>>>>> If you have more, please share with me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bruno >>>>>>> >>>>>>
