hetaphi.de
>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
> *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2015 9:07 AM
> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
>
>
>
> Noble, I still see the "Release Documentati
28213 Bremen
>> > http://www.thetaphi.de
>> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>> >
>> >
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: Noble Paul [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
>> >> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 5:39 PM
>> &g
o: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
Noble, I still see the "Release Documentation" section here
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/resources.html empty.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Noble Paul wrote:
I have removed the repeated CHANGES.txt references. It is there only
in the
; > Thanks for doing the release!
> > Uwe
> >
> > -
> > Uwe Schindler
> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> > http://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> F
From: Noble Paul [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 5:39 PM
>> To: Lucene Dev
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
>>
>> Thanks Uwe ,
>>
>> fixed
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>> >
hetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Noble Paul [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 5:39 PM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
>
> Thanks Uwe ,
>
> fixed
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Uwe Schindler
> > http://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-----
> >> From: Noble Paul [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 5:12 PM
> >> To: Lucene Dev
> >> Subject:
ble.p...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 5:12 PM
>> To: Lucene Dev
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
>>
>> "Lucene News (on Lucene sub page)
>> completely unformatted"
>>
>> which page exactly
>>
>> others fixed. Actua
ier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Noble Paul [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 5:12 PM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
>
> "Lucene News (on Lucene
"*) "In built security plugins" => "Built-in"? In fact, I am confused
reading that item and the next one. Are they the same or different?"
Items #1 and #2 are different
Built-in or in-built ? I'm not sure either
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> Under Solr highligh
Under Solr highlights:
*) "In built security plugins" => "Built-in"? In fact, I am confused
reading that item and the next one. Are they the same or different?
*) The MoreLikeThis QParser mlt => ... extra "mlt"?
*) (Added?) Scoring mode for query-time join and block join.
*) (Added? language-neutra
hi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Noble Paul [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 4:47 PM
>> To: Lucene Dev
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
>>
>> I'm planning to announce the releas
Hi Noble,
On all three news pages, you have the announcement date at 25 August (tomorrow
in the US, Europe and India). If you’re going to announce shortly (within the
next 3.5 hours, when the date will advance for you in India), those should be
24 August. (Along the same lines, the dates on t
...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Noble Paul [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 4:47 PM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
>
> I'm planning to announce the release of Lucene Solr 5.3 .
>
I'm planning to announce the release of Lucene Solr 5.3 .
Please check the site http://lucene.staging.apache.org/
--Noble
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Noble, FYI, I had already gone to bed when you sent this email, but at that
> point, it had been significantly less tha
Noble, FYI, I had already gone to bed when you sent this email, but at that
point, it had been significantly less than 72 hours from the time you sent out
the original RC2 VOTE email.
There are three conditions required for a release VOTE to succeed:
1. At least 72 hours must have passed since
e 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 9:49 PM
> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] 5.3.
e Paul [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 5:42 AM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
>
> Thanks everyone.
> We now have enough votes for the RC2 to be released.
>
> I shall start the process of publishing and releasing this.
>
> On
Thanks everyone.
We now have enough votes for the RC2 to be released.
I shall start the process of publishing and releasing this.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> +1
>
> -Yonik
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Noble Paul wrote:
>> hi all,
>> Please vote for the 2nd rel
+1
-Yonik
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Noble Paul wrote:
> hi all,
> Please vote for the 2nd release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.3.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.3.0-RC2-rev1696229
>
> You can run the smoke tester dir
s src.tgz file.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 9:49 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE
://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Noble Paul [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 2:24 PM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: [VOTE] 5.3.0 RC2
>
> hi all,
> Please vote for the 2nd release candidate for Lucene/Solr
+1
SUCCESS! [0:51:02.991482]
- Mark
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
> I found a typo in the changelog that looks like my sister is a popular
> singer but I don't think it's worth a respin. :-)
>
> Also Elasticsearch looks happy with this RC.
>
> +1 SUCCESS! [1:00:50.650985
I found a typo in the changelog that looks like my sister is a popular
singer but I don't think it's worth a respin. :-)
Also Elasticsearch looks happy with this RC.
+1 SUCCESS! [1:00:50.650985]
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> hi all,
> Please vote for the 2nd release candi
oops , I shall wait
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> Aren't we supposed to wait for 72 hours after a RC has been uploaded
> before publishing?[1]
>
> [1] https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo#Publishing
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
>> Tha
Sorry, the vote has not yet passed.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Noble Paul wrote:
> Thanks everyone! The vote for 5.3.0 RC2 has now passed.
> I shall start the process of publishing and releasing this.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:53 AM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> +1
>> (Jav
Aren't we supposed to wait for 72 hours after a RC has been uploaded
before publishing?[1]
[1] https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo#Publishing
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> Thanks everyone! The vote for 5.3.0 RC2 has now passed.
> I shall start the process of pu
Thanks everyone! The vote for 5.3.0 RC2 has now passed.
I shall start the process of publishing and releasing this.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:53 AM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
wrote:
> +1
> (Java 7)
>
> SUCCESS! [1:02:40.331020]
>
> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Autho
+1
(Java 7)
SUCCESS! [1:02:40.331020]
--
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
+1
(Java 7)
SUCCESS! [0:50:19.326227]
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
> (Java 7)
> SUCCESS! [1:54:57.008126]
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Anshum Gupta
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> S
+1
(Java 7)
SUCCESS! [1:54:57.008126]
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Anshum Gupta
wrote:
> +1
>
> Smoke tester is happy with both Java 7 & 8:
>
> SUCCESS! [1:18:46.151515]
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Noble Paul wrote:
>
>> hi all,
>> Please vote for the 2nd release candidate for Luc
+1
Smoke tester is happy with both Java 7 & 8:
SUCCESS! [1:18:46.151515]
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Noble Paul wrote:
> hi all,
> Please vote for the 2nd release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.3.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lu
+1
Tested with both Java7 and Java8.
SUCCESS! [0:57:25.409123]
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> hi all,
> Please vote for the 2nd release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.3.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.3
SUCCESS! 2:38:50.471225
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [1:31:49.158753] tested Java 7 & 8
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:24:10.371290]
>>
>> Lucene and Solr docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>>
>> Steve
+1
SUCCESS! [1:31:49.158753] tested Java 7 & 8
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:24:10.371290]
>
> Lucene and Solr docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>
> Steve
>
>> On Aug 17, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Noble Paul wrote:
>>
>> hi all,
>> Please vote for the 2nd r
+1
SUCCESS! [0:24:10.371290]
Lucene and Solr docs, changes and javadocs look good.
Steve
> On Aug 17, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Noble Paul wrote:
>
> hi all,
> Please vote for the 2nd release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.3.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/d
hi all,
Please vote for the 2nd release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.3.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.3.0-RC2-rev1696229
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
h
37 matches
Mail list logo
