OK - well, this vote passed, but we will re-spin to capture the bug
fix and the JDK-19 support. I'll open a new vite thread for RC2
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 9:57 AM Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> See my mail before. Delete gradle.properties from Lucene checkout folder.
>
> Uwe
>
> Am 26.09.2022 um
See my mail before. Delete gradle.properties from Lucene checkout folder.
Uwe
Am 26.09.2022 um 15:51 schrieb Michael Sokolov:
Hm the build failed with this:
FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.
* What went wrong:
Execution failed for task ':lucene:core:compileMain19Java'.
Error while
Hm the build failed with this:
FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.
* What went wrong:
Execution failed for task ':lucene:core:compileMain19Java'.
> Error while evaluating property 'javaCompiler' of task
> ':lucene:core:compileMain19Java'
> Failed to calculate the value of task
Nice! Thanks everyone, I will refresh and start building the artifacts
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 9:33 AM Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> OK,
>
> Java 19 support for Panama Foreign is in! Thanks for waiting!
>
> Uwe
>
> Am 26.09.2022 um 15:08 schrieb Uwe Schindler:
>
> I will also merge shortly! Please
OK,
Java 19 support for Panama Foreign is in! Thanks for waiting!
Uwe
Am 26.09.2022 um 15:08 schrieb Uwe Schindler:
I will also merge shortly! Please have a quick look @
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/912
That's really great that Eclipse Adoptium released in time :-)
Uwe
Am
I will also merge shortly! Please have a quick look @
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/912
That's really great that Eclipse Adoptium released in time :-)
Uwe
Am 26.09.2022 um 14:57 schrieb Adrien Grand:
The change is now on branch_9_4.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 2:38 PM Adrien Grand
The change is now on branch_9_4.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 2:38 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> I opened a PR and will backport it to relevant branches shortly:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11818.
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 2:26 PM Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> if you give me
I opened a PR and will backport it to relevant branches shortly:
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11818.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 2:26 PM Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> if you give me an hour or so to add changes. All fine now!
> > I will re-spin today. I don't think we should wait
Hi Michael,
if you give me an hour or so to add changes. All fine now!
I will re-spin today. I don't think we should wait any longer for
AdoptOpenJDK - sorry Uwe; I too would like to be able to mess around
with the new features in JDK19, but I think it's not a good precedent
to tie our release
OK, this is clearly messed up, but just for my education, I'd like to
understand the possible failure scenario. Oh thanks Adrien, just saw
your latest. So that confirms what I was thinking: that this is not
likely to cause problems in any foreseeable scenario; there is no
Hey Uwe,
This problem would not be observed by bwc tests because they always make
sure to use the right codec. The problem only arises if things get mixed up
for some reason, and the wrong codec gets used to read a segment. Hopefully
no user would ever see this problem in practice.
The main
Hi again,
About the original bug you reported: This is really serious and we MUST
respin!
That opens the following question: Why was this bug not discoveredby the
backwards compatibility tests? If you open a 9.0 index from backwards
indexes with 9.4 it should complain? Or does this pass
Hi,
cool. Could we please wait with the respon till Adoption released also
OpenJDK 19, so we can include the Java 19 MMapDirectory as discussed
before. Everything is ready to merge!
Uwe
Am 26.09.2022 um 11:42 schrieb Adrien Grand:
Ignacio made me notice than the new Lucene94FieldInfosFormat
Ignacio made me notice than the new Lucene94FieldInfosFormat did not change
the codec name compared to Lucene90FieldInfosFormat:
https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/branch_9_4/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene94/Lucene94FieldInfosFormat.java#L376
.
The issue with this is that
+1 (binding)
The smoke tests passed.
SUCCESS! [2:49:17.242508]
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:22 PM Patrick Zhai wrote:
> (non-binding) +1
>
> SUCCESS! [1:11:00.934249]
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 9:44 AM Vigya Sharma wrote:
>
>> The smoke tests passed for me too..
>>
>>
>> (no vote)
>>
>>
(non-binding) +1
SUCCESS! [1:11:00.934249]
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 9:44 AM Vigya Sharma wrote:
> The smoke tests passed for me too..
>
>
> (no vote)
>
> SUCCESS! [1:12:31.588303]
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:27 AM Ignacio Vera wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:46:00.508949]
>>
>> On Thu,
The smoke tests passed for me too..
(no vote)
SUCCESS! [1:12:31.588303]
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:27 AM Ignacio Vera wrote:
> +1
>
>
> SUCCESS! [0:46:00.508949]
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 9:53 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
>
>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:35.275017]
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 9:19 PM
+1
SUCCESS! [0:46:00.508949]
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 9:53 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
> +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:35.275017]
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 9:19 PM Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:27:16.514391]
>>
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>>
+1 SUCCESS! [0:45:35.275017]
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 9:19 PM Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> SUCCESS! [0:27:16.514391]
>
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 2:32 PM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>>
>> +1.
>> SUCCESS!
+1
SUCCESS! [0:27:16.514391]
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 2:32 PM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> +1.
> SUCCESS! [0:53:33.891603]
>
>
>> Ran the smoketester with both java 11 and 17:
>>
>> SUCCESS! [2:41:19.024193]
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 10:10 PM
+1.
SUCCESS! [0:53:33.891603]
> Ran the smoketester with both java 11 and 17:
>
> SUCCESS! [2:41:19.024193]
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 10:10 PM Michael Sokolov
> wrote:
> >
> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.0
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >
>
+1
Ran the smoketester with both java 11 and 17:
SUCCESS! [2:41:19.024193]
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 10:10 PM Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
Hi,
Policeman Jenkins tested the release, no issues found:
https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/19/console
SUCCESS! [1:31:12.952025]
Finished: SUCCESS
I have no problem with releasing this,but please also check my other mail.
Uwe
Am 21.09.2022 um 04:10 schrieb Michael
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.0-RC1-rev-f5d0646daa5651f2192282ac85551bca667e34f9
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u
24 matches
Mail list logo
