[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-21 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14966553#comment-14966553 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6821: - Commit 1709780 from

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-20 Thread Tommaso Teofili (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14964899#comment-14964899 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-6821: - I will run another round of testing and inspections

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-20 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14965008#comment-14965008 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6821: - Commit 1709576 from

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-20 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14965344#comment-14965344 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-6821: bq. Do we want to backport it to 5.x? +1, I

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-20 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14965765#comment-14965765 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6821: - Commit 1709683 from

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-19 Thread Adrien Grand (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14963041#comment-14963041 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-6821: -- +1 on my end as well > TermQuery's constructors should

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-17 Thread Tommaso Teofili (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14961776#comment-14961776 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-6821: - from my perspective we can proceed committing this

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-17 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14961845#comment-14961845 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-6821: -- The patch of 14 October LGTM, and tests pass here. >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-14 Thread Tommaso Teofili (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14956971#comment-14956971 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-6821: - bq. One could also create the Term in the loop and

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-12 Thread Tommaso Teofili (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14953138#comment-14953138 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-6821: - do you mean the {{BytesRef.deepCopyOf}} at

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-12 Thread Tommaso Teofili (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14953160#comment-14953160 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-6821: - after a quick look it doesn't seem removing the deep

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-12 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14953479#comment-14953479 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-6821: -- One could also create the Term in the loop and pass that, or

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-09 Thread Adrien Grand (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14950213#comment-14950213 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-6821: -- I like how the patch makes things simpler. I'll wait a bit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-09 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14950780#comment-14950780 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-6821: -- bq. Can you also remove the explicit cloning that we added

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-03 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14942304#comment-14942304 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-6821: -- The patch also removes a call to the term constructor in

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-03 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14942337#comment-14942337 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-6821: -- There is another Term constructor call that is a clone at

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-03 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14942191#comment-14942191 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-6821: -- I had a look at the core code for the use of the TermQuery

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-03 Thread Jack Krupansky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14942310#comment-14942310 ] Jack Krupansky commented on LUCENE-6821: Won't this change have the prospect of increasing the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-10-03 Thread Adrien Grand (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14942325#comment-14942325 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-6821: -- I don't think we should bother at all: executing a term

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6821) TermQuery's constructors should clone the incoming term

2015-09-30 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936541#comment-14936541 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-6821: -- See (also?) LUCENE-4483. > TermQuery's constructors should