Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-11.0.21) - Build # 14204 - Unstable!

Hi Uwe, Apologies for the late reply. I suggested to use this reader to some customers, but they were using Solr > or Elasticsearch and it's not easy to implement it there. And they didn't > want to pay the expensive Uwe. >  > Oh, they should know better - Mr Uwe is worth his price tag for

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-11.0.21) - Build # 14204 - Unstable!

Ha. Cool! Nice to meet. I suggested to use this reader to some customers, but they were using Solr or Elasticsearch and it's not easy to implement it there. And they didn't want to pay the expensive Uwe.  How do you handle deletes. Because the main issue with those readers is that you can't

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-11.0.21) - Build # 14204 - Unstable!

> ParallelReader is also seldomly used, maybe we should remove support at > some point. I don't know anybody using it, because it is very complicated > to maintain consistent indexes. It only works with stable merge policies. > You do know somebody - you know me. We're using it extensively - the

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-11.0.21) - Build # 14204 - Unstable!

Found the PR. Somehow the mailinglist didn't get it. Am 2. Dezember 2023 09:58:45 MEZ schrieb Uwe Schindler : >Hi Chris, > >I can't find the PR. > >I am interested, because I wrote the original ParallelReader tests. > >IMHO the parallel readers are so sensitive to random changes, the test setup

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-11.0.21) - Build # 14204 - Unstable!

Sorry, PR link: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12865 -Chris On Saturday, December 2, 2023, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I can't find the PR. > > > > I am interested, because I wrote the original ParallelReader tests. > > IMHO the parallel readers are so sensitive to random

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-11.0.21) - Build # 14204 - Unstable!

Hi Chris, I can't find the PR. I am interested, because I wrote the original ParallelReader tests. IMHO the parallel readers are so sensitive to random changes, the test setup should not use any indexwriter randomization at all. ParallelReader is also seldomly used, maybe we should remove

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-11.0.21) - Build # 14204 - Unstable!

Hi, I noticed this failure locally, and opened a PR for it yesterday. It is a test issues, and indeed related to the recent merge policy test randomization change. -Chris On Saturday, December 2, 2023, Patrick Zhai wrote: > Seems it's because this MockRandomMergePolicy change >

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-11.0.21) - Build # 14204 - Unstable!

Seems it's because this MockRandomMergePolicy change recently makes ParallelLeafReader unhappy - it's reading two parallel segments from 2 dir and this MP makes

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-11.0.21) - Build # 14204 - Unstable!

Hmm this reproduces for me, and looks new/unique. Could it be related to recent 9.9.0 changes / release blocker? Mike On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 3:33 PM Policeman Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-9.x-Linux/14204/ > Java: 64bit/hotspot/jdk-11.0.21