Hi Feng,
> On 29 Nov 2023, at 11:25, Guo Feng wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Nightly benchmark shows that #12699 gets back some speed. I've backport it to
> 9.9.0. I think it is ready now.
Awesome!
> Sorry for delaying the release!
No apology needed. I appreciate your speedy work here.
I’ll
Hi Chris,
Nightly benchmark shows that #12699 gets back some speed. I've backport it to
9.9.0. I think it is ready now.
Sorry for delaying the release!
Feng
On 2023/11/28 08:32:59 Chris Hegarty wrote:
> Hi Guo,
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Let’s push the 9.9.0 branch cut until tomorrow
Hi Guo,
Thanks for the update.
Let’s push the 9.9.0 branch cut until tomorrow (rather than today as previously
suggested), which should allow time to determine the outstanding issues you
mentioned below. That should be more straightforward all round.
New 9.9.0 branch cut 12:00 29th Nov 2023
+1, thanks for volunteering Chris!
#12699 is merged to main. I plan to backport it to 9.9 if it fixes the
performance drop, otherwise revert #12699 and #12631 (the PR introduced
regression) and push them to the next version.
On 2023/11/21 09:51:43 Chris Hegarty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been a
Thanks Chris for checking.
I had been too optimistic for #12180, I'll push it to 9.10.
Fingers crossed that #12699 fixes the performance drop.
Le lun. 27 nov. 2023, 07:17, Chris Hegarty
a écrit :
> Hi Adrien,
>
> Comments inline.
>
> On 21 Nov 2023, at 12:31, Adrien Grand wrote:
>
> +1 9.9
Hi Adrien,
Comments inline.
> On 21 Nov 2023, at 12:31, Adrien Grand wrote:
>
> +1 9.9 has plenty of great changes indeed! Thanks for volunteering as a RM,
> Chris.
>
> It would be good to try and fix the PKLookup regression that was introduced
> since 9.8:
+1 to a 9.9.0 release, thanks for volunteering.
And also positive to immediately start planning the 10.0 release. JDK bump ->
17 is a major "feature" in itself, so we can bump main branch to 21 too. And
discontinue support for 8.x after the 8.11.3 release.
Jan
> 22. nov. 2023 kl. 17:11 skrev
+1 thanks for volunteering!
Hijacking the thread a bit, sorry, I started looking into whether this is a
good time to start looking ahead to 10? I know we had some rumblings about
releasing that so we can start requiring newer JDKs. But looking at CHANGES
it feels like we already back-ported most
+1, thank you Chris!
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023, 06:49 Benjamin Trent wrote:
> +1 9.9 will be a stellar release!
>
> Thank you Chris!
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 7:31 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
>
>> +1 9.9 has plenty of great changes indeed! Thanks for volunteering as a
>> RM, Chris.
>>
>> It would be
+1 9.9 will be a stellar release!
Thank you Chris!
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 7:31 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
> +1 9.9 has plenty of great changes indeed! Thanks for volunteering as a
> RM, Chris.
>
> It would be good to try and fix the PKLookup regression that was
> introduced since 9.8:
>
+1 9.9 has plenty of great changes indeed! Thanks for volunteering as a RM,
Chris.
It would be good to try and fix the PKLookup regression that was introduced
since 9.8: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/PKLookup.html.
Is it just about getting #12699
+1
Thank you for volunteering as RC Chris!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 4:52 AM Chris Hegarty
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been a while since the 9.8.0 release and we’ve accumulated quite a
> few changes. I’d like to propose that we release 9.9.0.
>
> If
12 matches
Mail list logo
