Re: Release 7.0 process starts

sql queries, random samples, time series > and > graph result sets. > > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ > LONDON) wrote: > > > Cool. How about 7th and 8th bullet points like thi

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

t;> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Joel Bernstein >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> For streaming expressions let's go with: >>>>>> >>>&

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

treaming Expressions adds a new statistical programming syntax >>>>> for >>>>> the statistical analysis of sql queries, random samples, time series >>>>> and >>>>> graph result sets. >>>>> >>>>> >>>&g

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

for >>>>> the statistical analysis of sql queries, random samples, time series and >>>>> graph result sets. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ <http://jo

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

t; >>>> Joel Bernstein >>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ <http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) >>>> mailto:cpoersc...@bloomberg.net>> wrote: >

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

gt;> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ >>>> LONDON) wrote: >>>> >>>>> Cool. How about 7th and 8th bullet points like this. 8th bullet >>>>> ending in Java 9 future magic still, not that the magic counts but

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

counts but fitting things on >>> roughly a screen full for folks to easily get the gist of the new release >>> is important I think. >>> >>> -Christine >>> >>> * Solr 7 adds Streaming Expressions, a new statistical programming syntax >>

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > *From:* ansh...@apple.com [mailto:ansh...@apple.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 20, 2017 5:20 PM > > *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Release 7.0 process starts > > > > Sounds good. > > > > Also, I

RE: Release 7.0 process starts

ubject: Re: Release 7.0 process starts Sounds good. Also, I am not a java expert like Uwe, and a few others here so let me know if we should leave in the ‘Jigsaw’ part. David, you added that yesterday and Mike looked at the Lucene release notes and let it stay there. So I was wondering i

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

oel Bernstein >>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ <http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) >>>> mailto:cpoersc...@bloomberg.net>> wrote: >>>> Cool. How ab

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

uture magic still, not that the magic counts but fitting things on >>> roughly a screen full for folks to easily get the gist of the new release >>> is important I think. >>> >>> -Christine >>> >>> * Solr 7 adds Streaming Expressions, a new statistic

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

gt;>>> * A new `_default` configset is used if no config is specified at >>>> collection >>>> creation. The data-driven functionality of this configset indexes >>>> strings as >>>> analyzed text while at the same time copying to a `*_str` field &

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

ease is >> important I think. >> >> -Christine >> >> * Solr 7 adds Streaming Expressions, a new statistical programming syntax for >> the statistical analysis of sql queries, random samples, time series and >> graph result sets. >> >> * Sol

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

rogramming >>>> syntax for >>>> the statistical analysis of sql queries, random samples, time series and >>>> graph result sets. >>>> >>>> * Solr 7 is tested with and verified to support Java 9 >>>> >>>> From: dev@lu

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

for > the statistical analysis of sql queries, random samples, time series and > graph result sets. > > * Solr 7 is tested with and verified to support Java 9 > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> At: 09/20/17 > 15:54:54 > To: Christine Poerschke (BLO

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

; syntax for >>> the statistical analysis of sql queries, random samples, time series and >>> graph result sets. >>> >>> * Solr 7 is tested with and verified to support Java 9 >>> >>> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 09/20/17 15:54:54 >>> T

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

ions, a new statistical programming syntax >> for >> the statistical analysis of sql queries, random samples, time series and >> graph result sets. >> >> * Solr 7 is tested with and verified to support Java 9 >> >> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 09/20/17 15:54:

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Sure. Joel, could you edit directly in the WIKI? (I'm about to go into a meeting.) Thanks! Christine From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 09/20/17 16:07:11To: Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON ) , dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Release 7.0 process starts For streaming expressions

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

with and verified to support Java 9 > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 09/20/17 15:54:54 > To: Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON ) , > dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Release 7.0 process starts > > This looks good, other than the wt=xml correction in #1, as Varun pointed &

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Release 7.0 process starts This looks good, other than the wt=xml correction in #1, as Varun pointed out. Also, I really think we should highlight streaming expressions (Math Engine) even if that means we don’t hit the ‘7 points’ mark :). -Anshum On Sep 20, 2017

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

ework will in future releases enable >> Solr >> to move shards around based on load, disk etc. >> >> * Solr 7 is tested with and verified to support Java 9. >> >> From: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> At: 09/20/17 >> 15:02:38 &

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

lr 7 is tested with and verified to support Java 9. > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 09/20/17 15:02:38 > To: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Release 7.0 process starts > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:16 AM Jan Høydahl <mailto:

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

lr can now allocate new replicas to nodes using a new auto > scaling policy framework. This framework will in future releases enable Solr > to move shards around based on load, disk etc. > > * Solr 7 is tested with and verified to support Java 9. > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

l in future releases enable > Solr > to move shards around based on load, disk etc. > > * Solr 7 is tested with and verified to support Java 9. > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 09/20/17 15:02:38 > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Release 7.0 process starts > > > > O

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

move shards around based on load, disk etc. > > * Solr 7 is tested with and verified to support Java 9. > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 09/20/17 15:02:38 > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Release 7.0 process starts > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:16 AM

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

shards around based on load, disk etc. * Solr 7 is tested with and verified to support Java 9. From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 09/20/17 15:02:38To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Release 7.0 process starts On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:16 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: And please, I was serious about

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:16 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > And please, I was serious about choosing 7 major features and not adding > random single improvements. The list has already creeped from 7 to 9 > bullets. If you want to add something, then ask youself which of the other > bullets that are less

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Thanks Jan, Mike, and everyone else. This reads so much better, and I agree that this should be the standard structure. I’m just updating the website right now. Once done, I plan to send out the notification. In case someone still wants to add/edit the notes, “now" is the time. -Anshum > On

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Ok, so I took the liberty of updating https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote70 with my changes Note that the previous version of the release notes can still be found at https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote70?action=info

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Hi Jan, I added a note for Streaming Expressions in the comments. Could you add that to the release notes? Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:17 AM, David Smiley wrote: > Excellent Jan! Editorial summaries should be the standard our users > expect. > > >

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Excellent Jan! Editorial summaries should be the standard our users expect. On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:51 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > I think the (Solr) release notes feels more like a dump of JIRA > descriptions than an editorial summary of main highlights. > People who want to dive deep can read C

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

e > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > From: Jan Høydahl [mailto:jan@cominvent.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 1:51 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Release 7.0 process starts > > > > I think the (Solr) release notes feels more like a dump of J

RE: Release 7.0 process starts

ttp://www.thetaphi.de/> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Jan Høydahl [mailto:jan@cominvent.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 1:51 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Release 7.0 process starts I think the (Solr) release notes feels more like a dump of JIRA descriptions than an edi

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

I think the (Solr) release notes feels more like a dump of JIRA descriptions than an editorial summary of main highlights. People who want to dive deep can read CHANGES, let’s choose top-7 largest changes, describe them editorially and refer to CHANGES for the rest including upgrade notes? I ma

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

OK I got back to a keyboard and added this to the Lucene release notes! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > I'm afk right now but we should add a blurb about much faster document > deletes/updat

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Should we change this sentence is both lucene and solr release notes "Apache Solr was tested to be fully compatible with the release of Java 9 and its module system Jigsaw, coming out tomorrow on September 21th!" to just "Apache Solr was tested to be fully compatible with Java 9" On Tue, Sep 19

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

I'm afk right now but we should add a blurb about much faster document deletes/updates in 7.0? Mike On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:32 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: > I will, thanks David. > > -Anshum > > > > On Sep 19, 2017, at 2:04 PM, David Smiley > wrote: > > I improved the Lucene notes on the wiki. P

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

I will, thanks David. -Anshum > On Sep 19, 2017, at 2:04 PM, David Smiley wrote: > > I improved the Lucene notes on the wiki. Presumably you'll pick up these > changes when you publish the release. > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:45 PM Anshum Gupta > wrote: > Pleas

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

I improved the Lucene notes on the wiki. Presumably you'll pick up these changes when you publish the release. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:45 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: > Please find the release notes here: > > Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote70 > > Solr: https://wiki.apache.or

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Please find the release notes here: Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote70 Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote70 I am cleaning up the ‘upgrading from 6x’ section to m

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

I don't think holding up the release process infinitely till we stabilize all the tests is an option. On the other hand getting an RC to build is pretty difficult ( I am facing the same problem with 6.6.1 ) and I am sure people will run into this while voting for the release? We could identify the

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

> Those flaky Solr tests are annoying since people will also run into failures when > checking the RC? Should we disable these tests on the 7.0 branch so that building > and verifying this RC isn't annoying to everybody working on this release? +1. If it is hampering the release process, I think w

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Though those failing tests are annoying, I would not recommend ignoring those tests. We can manually ignore those test failures when we are testing stuff out though. -Anshum > On Aug 28, 2017, at 11:10 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > Those flaky Solr tests are annoying since people will also ru

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Those flaky Solr tests are annoying since people will also run into failures when checking the RC? Should we disable these tests on the 7.0 branch so that building and verifying this RC isn't annoying to everybody working on this release? Le lun. 28 août 2017 à 19:23, Anshum Gupta a écrit : > Th

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Thanks Adrien! It worked with a fresh clone, at least ant check-licenses worked, so I’m assuming the RC creation would work too. I’m running that, and it might take a couple of hours for me to create one, as a few SolrCloud tests are still a little flakey and they fail occasionally. -Anshum >

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Adrien, Yes, ant check-licenses fails with the same error, and so does ant validate (from the root dir). This is after running ant clean -f. BUILD FAILED /Users/anshum/workspace/lucene-solr/build.xml:117: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/anshum/workspace/lucene-sol

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

You mentioned you tried to run the script multiple times. Have you run git clean at some point? Maybe this is due to a stale working copy? Le lun. 28 août 2017 à 08:53, Adrien Grand a écrit : > Hi Anshum, > > Does running ant check-licenses from the Lucene directory fail as well? > The error mes

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Hi Anshum, Does running ant check-licenses from the Lucene directory fail as well? The error message that you are getting looks weird to me since Lucene 7.0 depends on ICU 59.1, not 56.1 since https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7540. Le ven. 25 août 2017 à 23:42, Anshum Gupta a écrit :

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

A quick question, in case someone has an idea around what’s going on. When I run the following command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py --push-local /Users/anshum/solr/release/7.0.0/rc0 --rc-num 1 --sign I end up with the following error: BUILD FAILED /Users/anshum/workspa

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

A small nitpick, but could I get my surname normalize to its passport spelling while those files are edited anyway :-) I am out of date on my environment setup right now, so getting it fixed myself would take a little longer. It is Rafalovitch, not Rafalovich. (tch in the end, blame the Soviet pas

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

> On 23 Aug 2017, at 13:06, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Keep in mind that there is also branch_7_0. Right, but the changes related to these issues were committed to master before branch_7_0 was created, and these specific issues are only about back-porting to 6x. > > Uww > > Am 23. August 201

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Keep in mind that there is also branch_7_0. Uww Am 23. August 2017 12:26:42 MESZ schrieb "Andrzej Białecki" : > >> On 23 Aug 2017, at 08:15, Anshum Gupta wrote: >> >> I also found more issues when comparing 7x, with 6x this time. I’ll >take a look at wether it’s just the CHANGES entries or have

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

> On 23 Aug 2017, at 08:15, Anshum Gupta wrote: > > I also found more issues when comparing 7x, with 6x this time. I’ll take a > look at wether it’s just the CHANGES entries or have these actually missed > the branch. I assume it’s just the CHANGES, but want to be sure. If the > committers in

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

> - SOLR-10586 (janhoy) > - SOLR-10587 (janhoy) Both of these are only committed to 6.x branch, while the related SOLR-10584 and SOLR-10585 were committed to 7.x. This is correct. -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 23. aug. 2017 kl. 08.15 skrev Anshum G

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Guess I shouldn’t commit anything important tonight, there was a typo in my original email. SOLR-11228 is the current JIRA, and it was a false alarm - vimdiff collapsed a bunch of lines which I missed. It’s a bug fix in both 6.6.1, and 7.0 so we are good on this one. -Anshum > On Aug 22, 201

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Thanks Shalin! -Anshum > On Aug 22, 2017, at 11:10 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar > wrote: > > Hi Anshum, > > I've added SOLR-10821 to the CHANGES.txt on both branch_7x and branch_7_0 > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I’m sanitizing the CHANGES.txt in bran

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

I also found more issues when comparing 7x, with 6x this time. I’ll take a look at wether it’s just the CHANGES entries or have these actually missed the branch. I assume it’s just the CHANGES, but want to be sure. If the committers involved can pitch in, I’d appreciate, else I’ll work on this f

Re: Release 7.0 process starts

Hi Anshum, I've added SOLR-10821 to the CHANGES.txt on both branch_7x and branch_7_0 On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > I’m sanitizing the CHANGES.txt in branch_7_0, before cutting the RC. Here > are a couple of conflicting CHANGES.txt entries: > > - SOLR-11128: Entr

Release 7.0 process starts

Hi, I’m sanitizing the CHANGES.txt in branch_7_0, before cutting the RC. Here are a couple of conflicting CHANGES.txt entries: - SOLR-11128: Entry in 'Other changes' on branch_7_0 , but in 'Other changes' on master (Varun, Ishan) - SOLR-10821: Mention in master (7.0 section) but not in branch_7