;>
>> >> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 20:16 skrev Uwe Schindler :
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Javadocs and refguide do not work in staging sites. They can only be seen
>> >> on production servers. We can’t test those, but I am confid
ork in staging sites. They can only be seen
>> >> on production servers. We can’t test those, but I am confident, Jan’s new
>> >> htaccess rules will work (they point to the special subversion production
>> >> repo, still shared by lucene/solr for the time being).
Wrt the emeritus lists, I just copied them from Lucene for now, please see
https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html
Jan
> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 16:32 skrev Jan Høydahl :
>
> On the new "Project" page
> (https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html) I have attempted to
>
; Hi,
> >>
> >> Javadocs and refguide do not work in staging sites. They can only be seen
> >> on production servers. We can’t test those, but I am confident, Jan’s new
> >> htaccess rules will work (they point to the special subversion production
> >> repo, still sh
am confident, Jan’s
> new htaccess rules will work (they point to the special subversion
> production repo, still shared by lucene/solr for the time being).
> >>
> >> Uwe
> >>
> >> -
> >> Uwe Schindler
> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Breme
>> Uwe Schindler
>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>
>> From: Jan Høydahl
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:25 PM
>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Review request - New So
...@thetaphi.de
>
> From: Jan Høydahl
> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:25 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Review request - New Solr website
>
> Thanks for reviewing. Yes, the javadocs and refguide are not part of the site
> git repo, but will materializ
ps://www.thetaphi.de <https://www.thetaphi.de/>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de>
>
> From: Jan Høydahl
> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:25 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Review request - New Solr website
>
> Thanks f
-
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
From: Jan Høydahl
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:25 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Review request - New Solr website
Thanks for reviewing. Yes, the javadocs and refguide
Thanks for reviewing. Yes, the javadocs and refguide are not part of the site
git repo, but will materialize through .htaccess rules once the site is
published to the final location.
Jan
> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 17:17 skrev Michael McCandless :
>
> Thank you Jan! I clicked around a bit and it
Thank you Jan! I clicked around a bit and it looks awesome, but I hit a
broken link for the Solr javadocs "Latest Release" link on this page:
https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html -- likely this is
not an issue because
once this is moved to the right location, that link should
On the new "Project" page
(https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html) I have attempted to
make some kind of TLP landing page, framing "what" and "who we are".
The path I have taken so far is, instead of duplicating a list of names, which
will get out of date, instead link to
> I'm not aware that Confluence is going away, is it?
Sorry, I meant our continual attempts to reduce its importance in
favour of other options and reduction of (out of date) pages it has.
But, if there are no better options...
Regards,
Alex.
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 17:30, Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
Thanks for feedback Alexandre.
These sound like good proposals, but probably well suited as followup cleanup
after the site move.
Or you can make a PR against the "main/solr" branch if you want to merge it in
from day one.
I'm not aware that Confluence is going away, is it?
Jam
> 1. mar.
> David:
> * The news announcement that Solr has "graduated" to a separate TLP seems off
> to me in use of this word. To me, that word suggests it was too small or
> immature to warrant it previously.
I think you are right. I'll find a better wording. I've replaced graduated -->
moved for
Looks good.
I wonder if there is a way to bring the Reference Guide more
prominently to the home page. Maybe even in the top "Learn More"
section or even a section of its own right after.
I also wonder if the book section is so out-of-date (in terms of Solr)
that it should retreat to the
I noticed that the Ref Guide is missing from the new site. Is this
something that we will have to figure out how to restore after the site
goes live?
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 2:56 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499
> to prepare
Thanks for doing this Jan!
Some quick feedback on the Lucene site:
* The news announcement that Solr has "graduated" to a separate TLP seems
off to me in use of this word. To me, that word suggests it was too small
or immature to warrant it previously.
* IMO with Solr gone, the Lucene-core
I clicked around a bit; didn't do a thorough copy edit or anything,
but it seems as if the links are working, content looks accurate. The
notices about the new TLP seem good to me, too. Thanks for forging
ahead, Jan
-Mike
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 3:56 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been
Hi,
I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 to
prepare the separate website for Solr.
I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before
I actually publish the changes.
The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at
20 matches
Mail list logo
