Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.8.1

+1 Op di 2 mrt. 2021 om 03:36 schreef Andi Vajda : > > The PyLucene 8.8.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of > Apache Lucene 8.8.1 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.8.1

+1 > On 2 Mar 2021, at 08:21, Marc Jeurissen wrote: > > +1 > > Met vriendelijke groeten, > Marc Jeurissen > > > > Bibliotheek UAntwerpen > Stadscampus – Ve35.303 > Venusstraat 35 – 2000 Antwerpen > marc.jeuris...@uantwerpen.be > T +32 3 265 49 71 > >

RE: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.8.1

+1 Met vriendelijke groeten, Marc Jeurissen Bibliotheek UAntwerpen Stadscampus – Ve35.303 Venusstraat 35 – 2000 Antwerpen marc.jeuris...@uantwerpen.be T +32 3 265 49 71 From: Andi Vajda Sent: dinsdag 2 maart 2021 3:37 To: pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org Subject:

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.8.1

+1 On Mon, Mar 1, 2021, 6:35 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > The PyLucene 8.8.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of > Apache Lucene 8.8.1 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/8.8.1-rc1/ > > PyLucene 8.8.1 is built

[VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.8.1

The PyLucene 8.8.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of Apache Lucene 8.8.1 is ready. A release candidate is available from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/8.8.1-rc1/ PyLucene 8.8.1 is built with JCC 3.9, included in these release artifacts. JCC 3.9

Re: jcc - Output unbuilt package

Hi Phil, On Mon, 1 Mar 2021, Phil wrote: Great - I've attached a one-line change that outputs the missing info to stdout. I haven't added a command line switch at this stage as there is no functional change to the output - just an extra line of logging. Yes, a flag is not necessary for

Re: Review request - New Solr website

> I'm not aware that Confluence is going away, is it? Sorry, I meant our continual attempts to reduce its importance in favour of other options and reduction of (out of date) pages it has. But, if there are no better options... Regards, Alex. On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 17:30, Jan Høydahl wrote: >

Re: Review request - New Solr website

Thanks for feedback Alexandre. These sound like good proposals, but probably well suited as followup cleanup after the site move. Or you can make a PR against the "main/solr" branch if you want to merge it in from day one. I'm not aware that Confluence is going away, is it? Jam > 1. mar.

Re: Review request - New Solr website

> David: > * The news announcement that Solr has "graduated" to a separate TLP seems off > to me in use of this word. To me, that word suggests it was too small or > immature to warrant it previously. I think you are right. I'll find a better wording. I've replaced graduated --> moved for

Re: Review request - New Solr website

Looks good. I wonder if there is a way to bring the Reference Guide more prominently to the home page. Maybe even in the top "Learn More" section or even a section of its own right after. I also wonder if the book section is so out-of-date (in terms of Solr) that it should retreat to the

Re: [DISCUSS] Sunset the general@l.a.o mailing list?

+1 to remove. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 4:03 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Hi > > The general@ list is not being used for practically anything. I see some > user questions there and we announce releases. It may

Re: jcc - Output unbuilt package

Hi Andi, Great - I've attached a one-line change that outputs the missing info to stdout. I haven't added a command line switch at this stage as there is no functional change to the output - just an extra line of logging. Note this is necessary because although the program already outputs the

Re: Configurable Postings Block Size?

Oh, got it. This is great, thanks! Cheers, -Greg On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:28 AM Robert Muir wrote: > Yeah, have a look at gen_ForUtil.py > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 1:05 PM Greg Miller wrote: > >> Thanks for the feedback Robert; makes sense to me. I'll tinker with a >> forked codec and see if

Re: Configurable Postings Block Size?

Yeah, have a look at gen_ForUtil.py On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 1:05 PM Greg Miller wrote: > Thanks for the feedback Robert; makes sense to me. I'll tinker with a > forked codec and see if the experimentation produces anything interesting. > > When you mention "autogenerated decompression code", do

Re: Review request - New Solr website

I noticed that the Ref Guide is missing from the new site. Is this something that we will have to figure out how to restore after the site goes live? On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 2:56 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Hi, > > I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 > to prepare

Re: Review request - New Solr website

Thanks for doing this Jan! Some quick feedback on the Lucene site: * The news announcement that Solr has "graduated" to a separate TLP seems off to me in use of this word. To me, that word suggests it was too small or immature to warrant it previously. * IMO with Solr gone, the Lucene-core

Re: [DISCUSS] Sunset the general@l.a.o mailing list?

Yes, let's consolidate On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 6:45 AM Tomoko Uchida wrote: > > > I've been sending periodic PyLucene release votes there in order not to spam > > lucene-dev but I guess I can use lucene-dev instead ? > > In my view it's totally okay to send PyLucene release votes to lucene-dev. >

Re: Configurable Postings Block Size?

Thanks for the feedback Robert; makes sense to me. I'll tinker with a forked codec and see if the experimentation produces anything interesting. When you mention "autogenerated decompression code", do you mean that some of this code is actually being generated? Cheers, -Greg On Sun, Feb 28,

Re: Review request - New Solr website

I clicked around a bit; didn't do a thorough copy edit or anything, but it seems as if the links are working, content looks accurate. The notices about the new TLP seem good to me, too. Thanks for forging ahead, Jan -Mike On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 3:56 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > > Hi, > > I have been

Re: jcc - Output unbuilt package

Hi Phil, Excellent ! Yes, I'd accept a patch that makes your feature available via a new command line flag to JCC (don't forget to document it in __main__.py). It's ok to only send in a patch for the python3 version (under jcc3). The python2 version (under jcc2) is maintenance only,

Re: Some small questions on streaming expressions

Your first example looks like a bug to me. This may be work around for you: select(echo("Hello"), echo as blah, lower(echo) as blah1) Returns: { "result-set": { "docs": [ { "blah": "Hello", "blah1": "hello" }, { "EOF": true, "RESPONSE_TIME": 0 } ] } } The string

Re: [DISCUSS] Sunset the general@l.a.o mailing list?

> I've been sending periodic PyLucene release votes there in order not to spam > lucene-dev but I guess I can use lucene-dev instead ? In my view it's totally okay to send PyLucene release votes to lucene-dev. Best, Tomoko 2021年3月1日(月) 18:12 Bruno Roustant : > +1 > > Le dim. 28 févr. 2021 à

Re: [DISCUSS] Sunset the general@l.a.o mailing list?

+1 Le dim. 28 févr. 2021 à 22:23, Andi Vajda a écrit : > > On Sun, 28 Feb 2021, Jan Høydahl wrote: > > > Hi > > > > The general@ list is not being used for practically anything. I see > some > > user questions there and we announce releases. It may have had more > > purpose when there were 5

Review request - New Solr website

Hi, I have been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 to prepare the separate website for Solr. I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader review before I actually publish the changes. The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at