Healthy PR Approaches from Apache Beam

Hi all, I recently learned a few interesting things that the Beam project does to promote and maintain good interactions on PRs. 1. Community metrics dashboard . The graphs are pretty and insightful.

Re: Index ordinal data in the taxonomy

ork OK-ish?) > > Shai > > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 6:45 PM Stefan Vodita wrote: >> >> Hello Shai, >> >> Thank you for the feedback! I'll try to answer each of the questions. >> >> > will it change the API in non-backward compatible way, or impa

Index ordinal data in the taxonomy

Hi everyone, I work on the Lucene product search team at Amazon. We’ve been considering indexing scoring signals for ordinals into the taxonomy, which could reduce index size for some use-cases. Example Let's consider a library of research papers, where each paper is represented by a Lucene

Re: Index ordinal data in the taxonomy

affect the taxonomy index. > > Generally though, I don't see a reason not to support it. > > Shai > > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 1:03 PM Stefan Vodita wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I work on the Lucene product search team at Amazon. We’ve been considering

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.10.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:39:49.675498] On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 19:30, Adrien Grand wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.10.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.10.0-RC1-rev-695c0ac84508438302cd346a812cfa2fdc5a10df > >

Re: Request for dev list subscription

Hi Sandeepan, You can find information about the mailing lists, including how to sign up, at: https://lucene.apache.org/core/discussion.html Let us know if that doesn't work for some reason. Stefan On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 20:13, Sandeepan Baidya wrote: > Hi there, > > I would like to be added

Re: Announcing githubsearch!

Thank you Mike, I really like all the facets! One thing that bothered me about GitHub's own search was that it would return different results if I wasn't signed in. Maybe it does early stopping for non-authenticated users? In any case, this won't be a problem with githubsearch. Have you

Re: Welcome Zhang Chao as Lucene committer

Congratulations, Chao! On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 17:28, Adrien Grand wrote: > I'm pleased to announce that Zhang Chao has accepted the PMC's > invitation to become a committer. > > Chao, the tradition is that new committers introduce themselves with a > brief bio. > > Congratulations and welcome!

Re: Heads up: upcoming GitHub action to mark stale Lucene PRs

/apache/lucene/actions/runs/7447339092/job/20259452054 [2] https://github.com/apache/lucene/pulls?q=is%3Apr+label%3AStale+is%3Aclosed On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 at 15:47, Stefan Vodita wrote: > There's a flag for excluding draft PRs [1]. I'll add it to the workflow. > If we need more flexi

Re: Heads up: upcoming GitHub action to mark stale Lucene PRs

). > > Uwe > Am 04.01.2024 um 14:04 schrieb Michael McCandless: > > Hi Team, > > Stefan Vodita made an awesome simple PR adding a GitHub action to remind / > nag us about stale PRs: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12813 > > This happened after an in-person di

Re: Welcome Stefan Vodita as Lucene committter

my inconsistent practice habits. Practice will have to wait until I finish up the next PR - looking forward to many more in the future! Cheers, Stefan On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 15:56, Michael McCandless wrote: > Hi Team, > > I'm pleased to announce that Stefan Vodita has accepted

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.9.2 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [2:34:29.551907] On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 11:57, Chris Hegarty wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.9.2 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.9.2-RC1-rev-a2939784c4ca60bc28bf488b5479c02fc2e5e22c > >

Re: Healthy PR Approaches from Apache Beam

; > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 5:39 AM Stefan Vodita > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I recently learned a few interesting things that the Beam >> <https://github.com/apache/beam> project does to >

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 11:24, Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is > winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change. > > Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that will be) will > require a version of

Re: Lucene 9.11

Ben, I just merged #13414 , so it's not a blocker for the release. Thanks again for volunteering to be release manager! Stefan On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 14:58, Benjamin Trent wrote: > Hey y'all, > > I am planning on starting the release process

Re: Improve testing

I'll add a step in between 1 and 2 that I often forget: ./gradlew tidy This refactors your code to the style the project uses, which we have checks for. On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 00:53, Michael Froh wrote: > Is your new test uncommitted? > > The Gradle check will fail if you have uncommitted

Re: Improve testing

Some useful documentation on the gradlew commands: https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/help/workflow.txt On Sat, 25 May 2024 at 19:38, Stefan Vodita wrote: > I'll add a step in between 1 and 2 that I often forget: ./gradlew tidy > This refactors your code to the style the projec

Re: Intellij build/test times

+1, I had the same problem and it seems better now. Thank you, Dawid! On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 at 12:20, Michael Sokolov wrote: > Oh! TIL! so much better, thanks. And now I have the "Repeat" option > back in the test runner > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 6:18 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > > > > > > Don't know