[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-541) Incremental SVD Implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003830#comment-13003830 ] Sebastian Schelter commented on MAHOUT-541: --- the performance speedup looks incre

Re: GSoC 2011

> > Not to contradict Ted, but we do have some qualifying tasks, they just aren't > formalized. > Are we expecting a formal and published list for the qualifying task? Are Mahout patches encourage/requirement? I am looking at JIRA (issue 363) and playing with Mahout but how do I get myself an assi

[jira] Updated: (MAHOUT-541) Incremental SVD Implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Owen updated MAHOUT-541: - Attachment: MAHOUT-541.patch Here's my own version of the last patch with packages names fixed, some smal

[jira] Resolved: (MAHOUT-618) mahout-math's pom.xml should be configured to compile in Java6

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Owen resolved MAHOUT-618. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.5 Assignee: Sean Owen Committed, with a series of re

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: mahout-nightly #450

There was a downstairs coup. It is best to look the other way lest someone recognize you later and denounce you to the special police. http://jenkins-ci.org/content/jenkins http://weblogs.java.net/blog/johnsmart/archive/2011/02/16/jenkins-and-hudson-butler

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: mahout-nightly #450

Of course it wouldn't run mahout-core tests since it couldn't finish with mahout-math... stupid me. Ok let's see if it's a transient condition. On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: > also what i don't understand is that upon examining full console > output, it seems it only run

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: mahout-nightly #450

But then i might have put -Dmaven.test.skip=true in my maven settings.xml and forgot about it On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: > also what i don't understand is that upon examining full console > output, it seems it only runs tests in mahout-math but not mahout-core > ones.

[jira] Updated: (MAHOUT-531) MatrixWritable doesn't actually write/read anything

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Owen updated MAHOUT-531: - Resolution: Duplicate Assignee: Ted Dunning (was: Sean Owen) Status: Resolved (was: Patch

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: mahout-nightly #450

also what i don't understand is that upon examining full console output, it seems it only runs tests in mahout-math but not mahout-core ones. (When i do default 'mvn install' build, tests don't even run, i have to run 'mvn test' to run all of them, then they run -- including core ones.) On Mon, M

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: mahout-nightly #450

Probably, let's see what the next run brings. But who is Jenkins and what has he done with Hudson? On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: > Ooops. Artifact deploying/transfer issue? > >  All tests passed fine.

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (MAHOUT-531) MatrixWritable doesn't actually write/read anything

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003659#comment-13003659 ] Alexander Hans edited comment on MAHOUT-531 at 3/7/11 10:24 PM:

[jira] Updated: (MAHOUT-531) MatrixWritable doesn't actually write/read anything

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexander Hans updated MAHOUT-531: -- Attachment: MAHOUT-531.patch - support writing/reading of matrix labels - MatrixWritableTest -

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-531) MatrixWritable doesn't actually write/read anything

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003641#comment-13003641 ] Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-531: Alex, Thanks for looking at this carefully. Sor

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-531) MatrixWritable doesn't actually write/read anything

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003635#comment-13003635 ] Alexander Hans commented on MAHOUT-531: --- I finally got around to look at this again

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-618) mahout-math's pom.xml should be configured to compile in Java6

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003577#comment-13003577 ] Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-618: Over-rides are good! > mahout-math's pom.xml sho

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-618) mahout-math's pom.xml should be configured to compile in Java6

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003557#comment-13003557 ] Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-618: -- Going once going twice -- I'm going to add @Overrides

[jira] Updated: (MAHOUT-541) Incremental SVD Implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tamas Jambor updated MAHOUT-541: Attachment: MAHOUT-541.patch > Incremental SVD Implementation > -- > >

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-541) Incremental SVD Implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003539#comment-13003539 ] Tamas Jambor commented on MAHOUT-541: - I changed it to the latest snapshot, following

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-376) Implement Map-reduce version of stochastic SVD

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003493#comment-13003493 ] Dmitriy Lyubimov commented on MAHOUT-376: - That's fine. We'll have to go back to a

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-309) Implement Stochastic Decomposition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003462#comment-13003462 ] Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-309: Yes. Duplicated and superseded entirely. > Impl

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-616) Cannot use MahalanobisDistanceMeasure with Dirichlet clustering

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003457#comment-13003457 ] Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-616: Yes. And pushing the test for non null measure d

Re: Collections again

> > > depend on it and deprecate the Colt-derived collections lib. That > seems like a fine plan for me. Who needs to be maintaining 'yet > another collections lib'? > I'd say it really make little sense. We will probably keep HPPC because we have it tightly integrated in our commercial software,

Re: Collections again

Dawid, It's not that can't read it, it's that I don't know what to do about it. Due to my slight snow-blindness, it hadn't occurred to me to just depend on it and deprecate the Colt-derived collections lib. That seems like a fine plan for me. Who needs to be maintaining 'yet another collections li

[jira] Resolved: (MAHOUT-167) Convert code to Hadoop 0.20 API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Owen resolved MAHOUT-167. -- Resolution: Duplicate Assignee: Sean Owen For tidiness, I think we should consider this a subset

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-616) Cannot use MahalanobisDistanceMeasure with Dirichlet clustering

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003344#comment-13003344 ] Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-616: -- Hmm, surely there is a better approach that doesn't u

Re: Collections again

> This could be viewed as an opportunity. If HPPC or fastwhatever is a > superior device, we could *add* it under org.apache.mahout.coll, > leaving the colt stuff under math. Then we, over the long term, > improve the naming, and avoid and abrupt incompatibility. > You could. Or you could add a ma

Collections again

I have misplaced Dawid's thread. There's an interesting thing about our current situation. I forgot to rationalize the package names on the collections when I last worked on them. So they are all .math. This could be viewed as an opportunity. If HPPC or fastwhatever is a superior device, we could

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-619) Add normalized discounted cumulative gain to recommender evaluator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003327#comment-13003327 ] Hudson commented on MAHOUT-619: --- Integrated in Mahout-Quality #660 (See [https://hudson.apa

[jira] Updated: (MAHOUT-593) Backport of Stochastic SVD patch (Mahout-376) to hadoop 0.20 to ensure compatibility with current Mahout dependencies.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Owen updated MAHOUT-593: - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Ted Dunning Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) (Dmitriiy

[jira] Resolved: (MAHOUT-309) Implement Stochastic Decomposition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Owen resolved MAHOUT-309. -- Resolution: Duplicate Assignee: Ted Dunning (was: Jake Mannix) And then likewise I think this, b

[jira] Updated: (MAHOUT-376) Implement Map-reduce version of stochastic SVD

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Owen updated MAHOUT-376: - Resolution: Duplicate Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Am I correct that this is, for our

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-593) Backport of Stochastic SVD patch (Mahout-376) to hadoop 0.20 to ensure compatibility with current Mahout dependencies.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003303#comment-13003303 ] Hudson commented on MAHOUT-593: --- Integrated in Mahout-Quality #659 (See [https://hudson.apa

Re: anybody is using git-svn for apache svn commits?

I'm the same as Ted -- I have a local repo only and maintain my branches in there. Don't know about interoperability with other existing git-svn mirrors like the ones you mentioned, sorry. Dawid On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I use git svn exclusively any more. > > But all

[jira] Resolved: (MAHOUT-619) Add normalized discounted cumulative gain to recommender evaluator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Owen resolved MAHOUT-619. -- Resolution: Fixed > Add normalized discounted cumulative gain to recommender evaluator > --

[jira] Created: (MAHOUT-619) Add normalized discounted cumulative gain to recommender evaluator

Add normalized discounted cumulative gain to recommender evaluator -- Key: MAHOUT-619 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-619 Project: Mahout Issue Type: Improveme

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-618) mahout-math's pom.xml should be configured to compile in Java6

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003291#comment-13003291 ] Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-618: -- We had made mahout-math require only Java 1.5 simply

Re: anybody is using git-svn for apache svn commits?

I use git svn exclusively any more. But all of my git mirrors come from the base that I synchronize using svn. I haven't try squishing. I have been maintaining 4-7 local branches this way for some time. Works like a champ. On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: > in case of