> A general message to everybody on the list to wish you all a Happy New
> Year, and thank you for your contributions to the 'cause'.
>
> Although the general economy is not in a very good state, this may - in a
> sideways direction - increase interest in OpenOffice.org and give us a
> chance to ge
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 05:24:21 -0600, wrote:
A general message to everybody on the list to wish you all a Happy New
Year, and thank you for your contributions to the 'cause'.
Although the general economy is not in a very good state, this may - in
a
sideways direction - increase interest in Op
> The policy of not touching the front-page is a big mistake since it give
> us little to work with. Most of the communication is obscure to the user,
> just like the 'why' campaigns and others.
IMHO if the marketing project means anything it should have full control
over what goes on the front p
Hi Alexandro, Ian, all,
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> This is something that Mkt has been lacking since its inception. There is no
> webdeveloper/artist/copywritter position and of course uploading rights to
> just coordinate a sitewide campaign.
+1. Marketing shoul
> I would say the problem is a lack of concrete discussion; I'm sure
> that if someone put forward a [specific] suggestion about what they
> think would be good to have on the homepage / some other page(s) on
> the OOo website, they won't be ignored.
I'm just thinking back to a few years ago when
Hi Ian,
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:52 PM, wrote:
>> I would say the problem is a lack of concrete discussion; I'm sure
>> that if someone put forward a [specific] suggestion about what they
>> think would be good to have on the homepage / some other page(s) on
>> the OOo website, they won't be ig
ian.ly...@zmsl.com wrote (1-1-2009 20:32)
The policy of not touching the front-page is a big mistake since it give
us little to work with. Most of the communication is obscure to the user,
just like the 'why' campaigns and others.
IMHO if the marketing project means anything it should have full
Hi Ian,
ian.ly...@zmsl.com wrote (2-1-2009 10:52)
I'm just thinking back to a few years ago when this sort of discussion was
much more common. Nothing happened so pretty well all those involved
appear to have moved on to other things.
Speaking for myself: I've become much more careful with j
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 05:13:31 -0600, Cor Nouws wrote:
ian.ly...@zmsl.com wrote (1-1-2009 20:32)
The policy of not touching the front-page is a big mistake since it
give
us little to work with. Most of the communication is obscure to the
user,
just like the 'why' campaigns and others.
IMHO
Hi Alexandro,
It's in the project called 'www'.
Regards,
Ivan.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 05:13:31 -0600, Cor Nouws wrote:
>
>> ian.ly...@zmsl.com wrote (1-1-2009 20:32)
The policy of not touching the front-page is a big mistake s
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 04:43:49 -0600, Ivan M wrote:
Hi Ian,
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:52 PM, wrote:
I would say the problem is a lack of concrete discussion; I'm sure
that if someone put forward a [specific] suggestion about what they
think would be good to have on the homepage / some other p
> ian.ly...@zmsl.com wrote (1-1-2009 20:32)
>>> The policy of not touching the front-page is a big mistake since it
>>> give
>>> us little to work with. Most of the communication is obscure to the
>>> user,
>>> just like the 'why' campaigns and others.
>>
>> IMHO if the marketing project means anyt
On Sat, 03 Jan 2009 05:37:43 -0600, wrote:
ian.ly...@zmsl.com wrote (1-1-2009 20:32)
The policy of not touching the front-page is a big mistake since it
give
us little to work with. Most of the communication is obscure to the
user,
just like the 'why' campaigns and others.
IMHO if the market
13 matches
Mail list logo
