Nguyen Vu Hung, 06-09-2010 15:36:
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Vikram Gaur
wrote:
Hi All,
Community should have another derivative with all features and
compatibilities
Could anyone explain that is there any legal issue forking OOo?
There is no "legal" issue. But forks shouldn't be
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Vikram Gaur wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Community should have another derivative with all features and
> compatibilities
>
> Could anyone explain that is there any legal issue forking OOo?
--
Best Regards,
Nguyen Hung Vu [aka: NVH] ( in Vietnamese: Nguyễn Vũ Hưng )
vu
On 09/06/2010 04:18 AM, Ian wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 18:15 -0300, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
We don't need to fork that right now,
Agreed
+1
but we should invest more on
attracting investments. That will make it easy if we have to fork in the
future and will help the project, anyway.
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 18:15 -0300, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
> We don't need to fork that right now,
Agreed
> but we should invest more on
> attracting investments. That will make it easy if we have to fork in the
> future and will help the project, anyway.
That is what I have been saying f
Hi Luiz,
Good Job!!
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!!
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:52 AM, luiz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After many hesitations, so many doubts about the future of
> OpenOffice.org, Oracle has been publicly saying that "supports the
> software revolution". The more hurried they could understand that,
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
> Ian, 05-09-2010 17:56:
>
> And perhaps if Go-OO harbors enough supporters, it may branch off
>>> Oracle completely.
>>>
>>
>> Possibly, but for true independence and a chance of competing it needs
>> an income and I don't see much evi
Ian, 05-09-2010 17:56:
And perhaps if Go-OO harbors enough supporters, it may branch off
Oracle completely.
Possibly, but for true independence and a chance of competing it needs
an income and I don't see much evidence of capability in generating it
at a level that will compete with the resou
Simon Brouwer wrote:
Are there any concrete reasons to believe that Oracle's strategy with
OpenOffice.org is going to be radically different than Sun's?
Yes.
a) Look at the change in both the cost, and minimum number of licenses
for the ODF extension Sun created for use with MSO;
b) The
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Simon Brouwer wrote:
> Hi Luiz,
>
> Are there any concrete reasons to believe that Oracle's strategy with
> OpenOffice.org is going to be radically different than Sun's?
> It is not impossible that, at some point in time, Oracle's management could
> decide that
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 7:52 PM, luiz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After many hesitations, so many doubts about the future of
> OpenOffice.org, Oracle has been publicly saying that "supports the
> software revolution". The more hurried they could understand that,
> finally, was a declaration of love Free Soft
On 09/05/2010 02:44 PM, Simon Brouwer wrote:
> But as it stands I believe it is disrespectful and foolish to cast
> unwarranted suspicions on Oracle. Sun Microsystems has made tremendous
> efforts in the development of OpenOffice.org, for which we should be
> thankful. And if Oracle plans to conti
Hi Simon, everyone,
It's true that some of the accusations against Oracle are pure speculation,
and we can't really know what Oracle plans for OOo.
However, I personally don't trust Oracle anymore and feel that Oracle poses
a danger to open-source rather than a benefit.
I could understand that they
Hi Luiz,
Are there any concrete reasons to believe that Oracle's strategy with
OpenOffice.org is going to be radically different than Sun's?
It is not impossible that, at some point in time, Oracle's management
could decide that to continue the development and support
of OpenOffice.org is no
Hi everyone,
2010/9/5 Ian
> On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 14:24 +0530, Vikram Gaur wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Community should have another derivative with all features and
> > compatibilities
>
> The community needs the resources to support and maintain a code base
> that is complex and difficult to de
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 14:24 +0530, Vikram Gaur wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Community should have another derivative with all features and
> compatibilities
The community needs the resources to support and maintain a code base
that is complex and difficult to develop and maintain. That is the
reality. Th
Hi,
After many hesitations, so many doubts about the future of
OpenOffice.org, Oracle has been publicly saying that "supports the
software revolution". The more hurried they could understand that,
finally, was a declaration of love Free Software. Concept is wrong! It
is not hatred to Free Software
16 matches
Mail list logo
