Hi,
I've worked around it for now, but I wanted to understand a couple of
things:
- is there a way to append a custom notice? surefire-api contains
code from springframework (not a dependency), and I couldn't get
anything to append the right text
- what does appended-resources do? I
+1
Emmanuel
Joakim Erdfelt a écrit :
I would like to merge the archiva-MRM-239 branch back to trunk.
Not sure how long I should wait for the vote replies, but I'll do the
usual 72.
- Joakim
One thing before ...
Can we have the list of patchs that aren't yet applied on the trunk ?
Don't we have to apply them before or we'll never be able to do it (due to
the important changes you made) ?
Arnaud
On 2/23/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Emmanuel
Joakim Erdfelt a
Please vote for the release of Surefire 2.3. This now includes the
API, providers, plugin and report plugin.
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Staged at: http://people.apache.org/~brett/release-staging-repo/
Vote is open for 72 hours.
Release notes:
** Bug
* [SUREFIRE-49] - Surefire leaves
Applying them now won't help... they'd still need to painstakingly be
applied to the branch. Just as easy to do that after the merge (if
they are still relevant).
I believe some things on trunk may have changed since the last merge
- a final check of that will be needed first.
I'm still
maven-scm starteam provider :
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-starteam/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
we are having to use starteam...so good to know that it works on svn...what's the component that is responsible for it so I can debug it?
You can look at starteam wagon provider. Its trunk is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/wagon/trunk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we are having to use starteam...so good to know that it works on svn...what's the component that is responsible for it so I can debug it?
-Original
Hi,
The Maven2 pom.xml for WSS4J 1.5.1 should also contain the next
dependency:
dependencies
dependency
groupIdxalan/groupId
artifactIdxalan/artifactId
version2.7.0/version
scoperuntime/scope
/dependency
/dependencies
+1 works fine for our projects;)
Cheers,
Marc
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 09:53
An: Maven Developers List
Betreff: [vote] Release Maven Surefire 2.3
Please vote for the release of Surefire 2.3. This now
Good day,
The maven scm provider for Star Stream is in [1].
Cheers,
Franz
[1]
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-starteam
On 2/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we are having to use starteam...so good to know that it works
Hi Elliot,
I am remembering this issue and I was thinking that it was already
closed in the past.
Cheers,
Vincent
2007/2/22, Elliot Metsger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm attempting to inject attributes into the site plugin like so in my pom:
configuration
+1
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
Please vote for the release of Surefire 2.3. This now includes the
API, providers, plugin and report plugin.
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Staged at: http://people.apache.org/~brett/release-staging-repo/
Vote is open for 72 hours.
Release notes:
** Bug
*
+1
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Please vote for the release of Surefire 2.3. This now includes the API,
providers, plugin and report plugin.
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Staged at: http://people.apache.org/~brett/release-staging-repo/
Vote is open for 72 hours.
Release notes:
** Bug
*
As far as the ear goes, the patch does add a separate module named
continuum-ear. It's only content is the pom and it uses the ear plugin with
very little configuration other than the context root name. The other thing
it does is add the continuum-ear module to the root pom in a profile named
Thanks much. I probably wouldn't have gotten it done without your original
patch.
On 2/22/07, Hilco Wijbenga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice work!
+1
I saw that NestedRuntimeException and NestedCheckedException have old licenses.
Vincent
2007/2/23, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Please vote for the release of Surefire 2.3. This now includes the API,
providers, plugin and report plugin.
[ ]
Ok - I'll check Jira. I'm on the latest release of the site plugin, so maybe
the fix is in an as-of-yet unreleased version of the site plugin.
Thanks for the heads up Vincent,
Elliot
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi Elliot,
I am remembering this issue and I was thinking that it was already
I don't know how much of an issue this really is, but it's not a
terrible idea to have an ear activated only by profile. But one thing
to consider is if application server-specific files should be allowed.
If you let jboss in, who and how many are next? Where do you draw the
line? Fringe
Hi,
The main Proximity developer is here! :)
Thank you the invitation and we (at AbstractHorizon.org) think
it is pretty neat idea.
Proximity1 (note the 1 at the end) is in usable shape (even sorted
out the issue of WebDAV and deployment) and it is very near main 1.0
release.
Licensing wise,
allright, I understand now, if you force a build (through the webfrontend) it's
going to build regardless of scm result (see
org.apache.maven.continuum.buildcontroller.DefaultBuildController). so no
starteam provider problem here, thanx
-Original Message-
From: Edwin Punzalan
Hey Vincent,
Do you recall if the solution was in the Site Plugin itself, or some other
component like Plexus? I'm having a bear of a time searching Codehaus' Jira
and anything I can do to narrow the search result would help.
Best,
Elliot
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi Elliot,
I am
On 23 Feb 07, at 8:58 AM 23 Feb 07, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
Hi,
The main Proximity developer is here! :)
Thank you the invitation and we (at AbstractHorizon.org) think
it is pretty neat idea.
Proximity1 (note the 1 at the end) is in usable shape (even sorted
out the issue of WebDAV and
+1 - we've been waiting for this for WAY too long. (we're still using
2.1.3 due to some of the bugs)
Dan
On Friday 23 February 2007 03:52, Brett Porter wrote:
Please vote for the release of Surefire 2.3. This now includes the
API, providers, plugin and report plugin.
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ]
On Friday 23 February 2007 03:14, Brett Porter wrote:
I've worked around it for now, but I wanted to understand a couple of
things:
- is there a way to append a custom notice? surefire-api contains
code from springframework (not a dependency), and I couldn't get
anything to append the right
+1, though I would be interested to see if there are any plans to write up
documentation for it...the website is pretty bad.
http://maven.apache.org/surefire
-john
On 2/23/07, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 - we've been waiting for this for WAY too long. (we're still using
2.1.3
Brett,
On Friday 23 February 2007 10:38, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Friday 23 February 2007 03:14, Brett Porter wrote:
I've worked around it for now, but I wanted to understand a couple of
things:
- is there a way to append a custom notice? surefire-api contains
code from springframework
With the following voters in favor ...
Brett, Arnaud, Emmanuel, Nicolas
... the merge will commence shortly
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
+1
I'm not done, but I can't see any issues at a high level. I'll post
any thoughts I have later.
- Brett
On 23/02/2007, at 7:54 PM, Brett Porter
I'll drop this task into JIRA along with the test suite for 2.4.
On 24/02/2007, at 3:39 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 23 Feb 07, at 10:39 AM 23 Feb 07, John Casey wrote:
+1, though I would be interested to see if there are any plans to
write up
documentation for it...the website is pretty
+1
I'm not done, but I can't see any issues at a high level. I'll post
any thoughts I have later.
- Brett
On 23/02/2007, at 7:54 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Applying them now won't help... they'd still need to painstakingly
be applied to the branch. Just as easy to do that after the merge
+1
On 23 Feb 07, at 3:52 AM 23 Feb 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Please vote for the release of Surefire 2.3. This now includes the
API, providers, plugin and report plugin.
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Staged at: http://people.apache.org/~brett/release-staging-repo/
Vote is open for 72 hours.
Release
Please read http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-maven-evangelism.html
On 2/23/07, Frank Cornelis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The Maven2 pom.xml for WSS4J 1.5.1 should also contain the next
dependency:
dependencies
dependency
groupIdxalan/groupId
On 23 Feb 07, at 10:39 AM 23 Feb 07, John Casey wrote:
+1, though I would be interested to see if there are any plans to
write up
documentation for it...the website is pretty bad.
Yah, but I think we've forced people to read the code now so getting
the release out is more important.
+1
On 2/23/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote for the release of Surefire 2.3. This now includes the
API, providers, plugin and report plugin.
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Staged at: http://people.apache.org/~brett/release-staging-repo/
Vote is open for 72 hours.
Release notes:
That's what it was. It changed from NOTICE.txt to NOTICE in alpha-2,
so I had the wrong name. Working now - thanks.
On 24/02/2007, at 3:38 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Brett,
On Friday 23 February 2007 10:38, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Friday 23 February 2007 03:14, Brett Porter wrote:
I've worked
Hi,
SUREFIRE-256 has basically the same patch as SUREFIRE-122.
Furthermore SUREFIRE-256 has tests plus the patch.
Just wondering why -122 was applied and closed and -256
deferred to 2.4.
best regards
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe,
I was talking to trygve a bit on irc and it dovetailed nicely with
some plans I had talked about late last year in regard to
continuum...I am just about a month late is all. We thought we ought
to take a poll on here about continuum and see what folks thought.
This is not a vote, its just a poll
I've a SNAPSHOT of early february and it runs OK (except minor issues
with the remember me feature - I'll open an issue for that later).
I guess having an alpha out is a good thing, especially to make sure
that a 1.0.3 instance can be upgraded to 1.1
Cheers,
Stéphane
On 2/23/07, Jesse
Sounds good and can't waiting for the milestone build with fixes
~nakees
(seems I keep sending these to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Is it possible to install a Maven extension which can configure
Maven's proxy handling?
I'm wondering if with little work, that it might be possible to
create some kinda of plugin to Maven, which would embed a
I have posted a proposed patch to add include/exclude functionality to
JXR here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JXR-17
This is the last remaining issue scheduled for the 1.1 release.
As this is my first venture into JXR I would appreciate if someone could
review this patch. If it is
Aha. This problem may be related to :
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=2337561framed=yskin=177
Elliot Metsger wrote:
I'm attempting to inject attributes into the site plugin like so in my
pom:
configuration
attributes
Actually, I believe the current maven 2.0.5 supports setting up a
mirror entry like this
mirror
idcorporate.proxy/id
mirrorOf*/mirrorOf
urlhttp://my.corporate.proxy/maven//url
/mirror
(typed from memory, parsing errors potential in effect)
This would in effect send all requests to
Pinging all PMC members...
Dennis Lundberg skrev:
Hi,
I'd like to release the maven-changelog-plugin. A vote for this has
already taken place before, but I'm adhering to the new release process
with staged artifacts here. So I encourage you to cast your vote once more.
A lot of issues have
I'm trying to figure out
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGELOG-54
The reporter is getting an NPE based on the fact that the ChangeSet
returns null from getFiles(). I'm curious to know whether it is valid to
have a ChangeSet without files, i.e. where getFiles() returns null. I
feel as
Jesse McConnell wrote:
I was talking to trygve a bit on irc and it dovetailed nicely with
some plans I had talked about late last year in regard to
continuum...I am just about a month late is all. We thought we ought
to take a poll on here about continuum and see what folks thought.
This is not
Yes, please release an alpha version.
On 2/23/07, Jesse McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question: Should we take all the work that has been done on continuum
in the last year+ and get it pushed out as an Alpha1 or a Milestone1
or some suitable equivalent?
[+1/0/-1]
I was wondering what happened to release early, release
Yes Maven 2.0.x does allow you to configure a mirror for a repo, but
that is *not* what I am looking for.
Also, there is no corporate proxy, if I has the luxury of such a
proxy for my users then this would not be an issue. The problem is
that my users are all of the folks who build Apache
I didn't review any of the issues other than at a high level to
schedule them. 2.3 will be released if the vote passes and 2.4 will
be started straight away and all the issues evaluated.
I've commented on the issue that the tests still need to be applied -
thanks for pointing it out.
-
It all looks pretty much right to me - I'd say go for it.
- Brett
On 24/02/2007, at 8:52 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
I have posted a proposed patch to add include/exclude functionality
to JXR here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JXR-17
This is the last remaining issue scheduled for the
On 04/01/2007, at 4:32 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Jason - any further thoughts on this?
Ping... No is a valid answer :)
I'd like to get your summary put somewhere individuals can pick
things off to work on - probably a jira project for shared. WDYT?
I'm overcommitted for working on things
antrun: rolled back r462641 (jvanzyl) - passes again.
eclipse: just the one failure (though still exceptionally slow - 5
minutes) - EclipsePluginMasterProjectTest. It only fails when clean,
so it could be a simple fix. Anyone familiar able to take a look?
repository: was fixed a little
I've taken this down to upgrade the database after the jpox update so
we can run continuum trunk. Should be back up and running tomorrow.
- Brett
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 23 Feb 07, at 11:52 PM 23 Feb 07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: brett
Date: Fri Feb 23 20:52:20 2007
New Revision: 511210
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=511210
Log:
roll back r462640, these tests are failing
Fine provided it's not just a snapshot deployment missing.
54 matches
Mail list logo
