On 08/03/2008, at 4:42 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
I'm not having any luck staging the Javadoc plugin for a 2.4 release,
and I'm out of time. If someone else has time to do it, feel free...
(I can't do releases on Leopard due to a strange svn bug, and I've
chased problem after problem doing it fro
I'm not having any luck staging the Javadoc plugin for a 2.4 release,
and I'm out of time. If someone else has time to do it, feel free...
(I can't do releases on Leopard due to a strange svn bug, and I've
chased problem after problem doing it from the Windows VM, despite the
fact that I *did* ge
Why does the configuration option require a bump in version? If behavior can
be retrograded, it is a perfect fit for 2.0.x as well. Sorry I don't
understand better.
Paul
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Paul,
> These suggestions mean it gets bumped to 2.
Perfect. I'll request an account and then move the maven branches and
Its over there first and see how that works out.
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 10:18 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: continuum is down again
On Fr
Paul,
These suggestions mean it gets bumped to 2.1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Paul Benedict
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 10:34 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Comments / Ideas for MNG-3244
I find it strange that software wou
I find it strange that software would react differently simply because
someone upgraded the POM version. It should act differently if a different
setting is specified.
My recommendation is:
1) Solve it the correct way. Change the plugin/component to generate the
paths in the fashion intended. Allo
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can we get Hudson installed somewhere? Do we need a new zone for
> this or can it go on maven.zones?
It would be best to use the shared instance. See:
http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson
Infra isn't keen on PMC's
Seriously this can't continue any more. It doesn't matter if it's jetty
or zones or continuum, the fact is what we have is not working. There
are other solutions out there and we owe it to the Maven project to try
them out and find something that does work for us.
How can we get Hudson installe
>It's ugly, but there is a workaround for this now in respecifying the
>URLs in the child POMs. It's a pain but it's not the end of the world
>and I'd say better than adding even more voodoo.
Most people would say this isn't an acceptable workaround.
>I would say that's the best way to go -
I think
for now we should move the testing-harness back out of the tools and
then create a new plugin-testing structure. There's not a good reason to
mix runtime plugin tools and things only used to test the plugins.
+1
Benjamin
10 matches
Mail list logo
