Re: How to validate a Maven release? Fwd: [VOTE] Release Maven antrun plugin version 1.2

2008-07-21 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Couldn't we setup a custom profile for QA checks (pmd, checkstyle, clirr ...) that we activate in a separate project in the CI server ? It's what I begin to do at work. The advantage is to keep the integration build fast and we can have a look at the QA builds to improve them. Arnaud On Mon, Jul

Re: How to validate a Maven release? Fwd: [VOTE] Release Maven antrun plugin version 1.2

2008-07-21 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, I agree too. IMHO we don't have to block a release because they are checkstyle errors : releasing something must not be nightmare (we are here to help users and fix issues). Ok except for missing license headers in source files. We will find some exceptions which will prevent automatisation of

Re: How to validate a Maven release? Fwd: [VOTE] Release Maven antrun plugin version 1.2

2008-07-21 Thread Brett Porter
On 21/07/2008, at 4:56 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Couldn't we setup a custom profile for QA checks (pmd, checkstyle, clirr ...) that we activate in a separate project in the CI server ? It's what I begin to do at work. The advantage is to keep the integration build fast and we can have a

Re: Community Help with Maven ITs

2008-07-21 Thread Stephen Connolly
I'm having problems getting this set up to work from behind a http proxy. I've set up subversion's servers file correctly Here's what I get from the bootstrap: started ERROR: svn: No credential to try. Authentication failed org.tmatesoft.svn.core.SVNCancelException: svn: No credential to try.

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven antrun plugin version 1.2

2008-07-21 Thread Stephane Nicoll
It is maybe a stupid question, but I think it's still using ant 1.6.5. I know that switching to 1.7 (I did locally) issue a weird path with space problem on Windows. Ant 1.7.1 is out but I don't know if the problem is fixed and I am lazy to search in BugSuperZilla. To me, the biggest limitation

Re: Shade plugin's over-zealous exclusions

2008-07-21 Thread Mark Hobson
That seems better thanks. We really need some unit tests for this dependency reduced pom logic. It looks like ShadeMojoTest doesn't actually test ShadeMojo but duplicates DefaultShaderTest. Do you want me to retrospectively raise an issue for this? Cheers, Mark 2008/7/18 Daniel Kulp [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven antrun plugin version 1.2

2008-07-21 Thread Dennis Lundberg
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MANTRUN-68 is scheduled for version 1.3. I think Carlos wanted to get a version of the plugin out with all the fixes, before upgrading Ant. Yes, the spaces in a Windows path was fixed in 1.7.1. Stephane Nicoll wrote: It is maybe a stupid question, but I think

Re: How to validate a Maven release? Fwd: [VOTE] Release Maven antrun plugin version 1.2

2008-07-21 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, I agree too. IMHO we don't have to block a release because they are checkstyle errors : releasing something must not be nightmare (we are here to help users and fix issues). Right, I totally agree with that. I just wrote down things that are worth looking at during

RE: releasing the enforcer

2008-07-21 Thread Brian E. Fox
I may have missed something - are these values getting populated into project.getOriginalModel(), or is that method in some other way unsuitable? originalModel already has versions populated (essentially it's _not_ the original model). Even if it really was the original model, I still need

Re: How to validate a Maven release? Fwd: [VOTE] Release Maven antrun plugin version 1.2

2008-07-21 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 20-Jul-08, at 11:26 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote: Hi, 2008/7/19, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is great as long as it does not become bureaucratic and onerous for everyone to do a release. Totally agree with you: it could be time consuming for the release manager and for the

Re: Community Help with Maven ITs

2008-07-21 Thread Jason van Zyl
I'll start looking at this when I swap out Maven SCM to do everything for us. On 21-Jul-08, at 4:16 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: I'm having problems getting this set up to work from behind a http proxy. I've set up subversion's servers file correctly Here's what I get from the bootstrap:

Re: Add support on maven-integration-test-helper to emma

2008-07-21 Thread Marvin Froeder
Hi Folks, I manage to make 3 mojos to instrument, run, gather metadata and report emma coverage. Run is done by surefire on test phase. Question, how do I tell maven to run one mojo before test phase and after test phase run metadata and then report? VELO On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:00 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven antrun plugin version 1.2

2008-07-21 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Makes sense. Thanks for the info. S. On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MANTRUN-68 is scheduled for version 1.3. I think Carlos wanted to get a version of the plugin out with all the fixes, before upgrading Ant. Yes,

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven antrun plugin version 1.2

2008-07-21 Thread Jesse McConnell
+1 On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Release was rolledback and performed again, site and staging repo updated, please restart the voting process http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11125styleName=Htmlversion=12210 Staging repo:

roadmap for maven-shade-plugin?

2008-07-21 Thread John Casey
Hi everyone, I'd like to check and see how close people think we're getting to a release of the maven-shade-plugin. I understand there are some outstanding issues related to excludes, but at this point the pending 1.2 release is blocking the maven 2.0.10 release. Can we talk about specific

Re: roadmap for maven-shade-plugin?

2008-07-21 Thread Mark Hobson
Hi John, The thread regarding excessive excludes is here: http://www.nabble.com/Shade-plugin%27s-over-zealous-exclusions-tt18462091.html The latest is that Daniel made some changes which appeared to fix my problems, although I'd like to see some unit tests for the dependency reduced pom logic.

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven antrun plugin version 1.2

2008-07-21 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 Carlos Sanchez wrote: Release was rolledback and performed again, site and staging repo updated, please restart the voting process http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11125styleName=Htmlversion=12210 Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~carlos/staging-repo

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven antrun plugin version 1.2

2008-07-21 Thread John Casey
+1 Carlos Sanchez wrote: Release was rolledback and performed again, site and staging repo updated, please restart the voting process http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11125styleName=Htmlversion=12210 Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~carlos/staging-repo

Re: roadmap for maven-shade-plugin?

2008-07-21 Thread Daniel Kulp
I think it's OK to do a release of it now, especially if it's blocking 2.0.10. I've tested it with CXF and it looks OK there. No regressions in the dep-reduced pom. It would be NICE if the OpenEJB folks could do a quick test with their code, but I wouldn't hold it up for that to

Re: roadmap for maven-shade-plugin?

2008-07-21 Thread John Casey
I'm also investigating other ways we might be able to work around the 2.0.10 release without requiring the new shade-plugin release, fwiw. It might be a good idea to make sure the tests are in place on this release of the shade plugin; I think we can put some temporary code into maven for

Re: roadmap for maven-shade-plugin?

2008-07-21 Thread Paul Benedict
Does anyone consider the maven-shade-plugin to be one that should get a standard version in the super pom? Paul On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:53 AM, John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm also investigating other ways we might be able to work around the 2.0.10 release without requiring the new

Re: artifact retrieval, mercury, and jetty-client

2008-07-21 Thread David Jencks
On Jul 18, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote: djencks, I am not sure what the client side of a jaspi api would look like, can you give an example of what it would be doing? The basic idea is that, in a client, you'd be calling a authentication context before sending the message to

Re: artifact retrieval, mercury, and jetty-client

2008-07-21 Thread Jason van Zyl
Why is this particular API of interest? Trying to the container security inside G to grab plugins from a remote repository? On 21-Jul-08, at 2:39 PM, David Jencks wrote: On Jul 18, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote: djencks, I am not sure what the client side of a jaspi api

Re: roadmap for maven-shade-plugin?

2008-07-21 Thread David Blevins
On Jul 21, 2008, at 8:55 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: I think it's OK to do a release of it now, especially if it's blocking 2.0.10. I've tested it with CXF and it looks OK there. No regressions in the dep-reduced pom. It would be NICE if the OpenEJB folks could do a quick test with

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Testing Tools 1.2

2008-07-21 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 -- Olivier 2008/7/18 Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Important note: this release changes the groupId for the artifacts: http://maven.markmail.org/message/s6l35jjjyz242lfa?q=plugin+testing+reorganization+from:%22Vincent+Siveton%22page=1 We solved several issues:

Re: roadmap for maven-shade-plugin?

2008-07-21 Thread Dennis Lundberg
I've gone over the docs, to make sure they are OK. I also went through a couple of the other pre release checks. While doing this I found an error in the Clirr report that might be worth having a look at: In method 'public boolean updateExcludesInDeps(org.apache.maven.project.MavenProject,

Re: roadmap for maven-shade-plugin?

2008-07-21 Thread Daniel Kulp
Method should probably be private or package protected. Thus, this would be irrelevant. Dan On Jul 21, 2008, at 4:03 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: I've gone over the docs, to make sure they are OK. I also went through a couple of the other pre release checks. While doing this I found

java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError when running a test

2008-07-21 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
I'm getting a java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError when running a test and yet, the code compiles fine. Any ideas as to what's going on? The exact same code compiles and test fine on another box which has the same mvn and java version. There are no differences between 'mvn

Need help regarding auto-generated META-INF directory

2008-07-21 Thread Boregowda, Krishna
Hi, We are having Multi module maven project in our application. One of the modules in our application is hibernate based. When I try to import this project from the SVN repository META-INF directory is auto created in hibernate module. We have no plans of having any specific information in