Hanging builder staging site

Hi, does someone know where to look cause currently the site staging job seemed to blocked and waiting for 11 hours http://ci.apache.org/builders/maven-site-staging Kind regards Karl-Heinz Marbaise - To unsubscribe, e-m

Re: svn commit: r1626943 - in /maven/plugins/trunk: maven-acr-plugin/ maven-assembly-plugin/ maven-dependency-plugin/ maven-dependency-plugin/src/it/projects/setup-custom-ear-lifecycle/manager/ maven-

wow, including tar from common-compress?? -D On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Kristian Rosenvold < kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote: > "Not any more" :) > https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLXCOMP/fixforversion/20630 > > > 2.5 has full commons-compress support, java 7 file attribute support.

Re: svn commit: r1626943 - in /maven/plugins/trunk: maven-acr-plugin/ maven-assembly-plugin/ maven-dependency-plugin/ maven-dependency-plugin/src/it/projects/setup-custom-ear-lifecycle/manager/ maven-

"Not any more" :) https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLXCOMP/fixforversion/20630 2.5 has full commons-compress support, java 7 file attribute support. Kristian 2014-09-23 8:42 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise : > Hi Kristian, > > I have short question > > You seemed to have released a new vers

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parent POM version 15

Is it safe/good to upgrade to m-javadoc-p v2.10, as there has been several reported issues [1] [2] [3]? We don't want to cause a lot of issues for apache projects. [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/i#browse/MJAVADOC-407 [2] http://jira.codehaus.org/i#browse/MJAVADOC-408 [3] http://stackoverflow.com/que

Re: svn commit: r1626872 - in /maven/plugins/trunk: maven-assembly-plugin/pom.xml maven-dependency-plugin/pom.xml maven-war-plugin/pom.xml

Hi Kristian, an other question concerning plexus-io... I have taken a look into jira but unfortunately there is no issue related to plexus-io 2.0.9, 2.0.11, 2.0.12... And only a single issue to 2.0.10 ? Do 2.0.9, 2.0.11 never made to be released...does this mean only that single issue has

Re: svn commit: r1626943 - in /maven/plugins/trunk: maven-acr-plugin/ maven-assembly-plugin/ maven-dependency-plugin/ maven-dependency-plugin/src/it/projects/setup-custom-ear-lifecycle/manager/ maven-

Hi Kristian, I have short question You seemed to have released a new version of plexus-archiver 2.5 but in JIRA there is one issue related with plexus-archiver 2.5 not solved ? Kind regards Karl-Heinz Marbaise On 9/23/14 7:18 AM, krosenv...@apache.org wrote: Author: krosenvold Date: Tu

Re: Problem while getting injected parameters from plugin configuration.

On 22 Sep 2014, at 23:34, animator wrote: > The main problem from the topic finally I managed to resolve. The problem was > wrong configuration in test-polyglot-project, the groupId of declared plugin > in pom was wrong and when the goal was executed it was used plugin from > local repository and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parent POM version 15

I am just trying to help some git sufferers. On Sep 22, 2014 6:55 PM, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > The Javadoc plugin is at 2.10, is it not used because it is not considered > stable? > > Gary > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Here is release 15 of the P

Re: Problem while getting injected parameters from plugin configuration.

You need to use org.apache.maven.plugins.annotations.Component annotation inside maven plugins, I don't believe plexus @Requirement works. -- Regards, Igor On 2014-09-22, 18:34, animator wrote: The main problem from the topic finally I managed to resolve. The problem was wrong configuration in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parent POM version 15

The Javadoc plugin is at 2.10, is it not used because it is not considered stable? Gary On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Hi, > > Here is release 15 of the POM we maintain for the entire ASF. The > changes since release 14 can be seen here: > > > http://svn.apache.org/v

Re: Problem while getting injected parameters from plugin configuration.

The main problem from the topic finally I managed to resolve. The problem was wrong configuration in test-polyglot-project, the groupId of declared plugin in pom was wrong and when the goal was executed it was used plugin from local repository and any configuration from pom was omitted.. Anyway tha

[VOTE] Release Apache Parent POM version 15

Hi, Here is release 15 of the POM we maintain for the entire ASF. The changes since release 14 can be seen here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/apache-15/pom.xml?r1=HEAD&r2=1575044&diff_format=h Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheapache-1001 S

Getting ready to release version 15 of the Apache pom, but ...

The index.apt already has a line for version 15. As I read http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/parent-pom-release.html, this is not what I expect. Did 15 get partially released or something? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un

[ANN] Apache Maven Release 2.5.1 Released

The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Release component, version 2.5.1 maven-release provides technology for automating releases, including the maven-release-plugin. http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-release-plugin/ You should specify the version in you

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Maven Release Plugin 2.5.1, take 2

This vote passes with me, Karl, and Kristian. I will promote. On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a respin of 2.5.1. This includes one more commit that allows > builds on Maven 2.2.1 of the plugin. > > We solved 4 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Checkstyle Plugin version 2.13

Small correction: my vote was +0 Robert Op Sun, 21 Sep 2014 21:17:03 +0200 schreef Hervé BOUTEMY : Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Karl Heinz Marbaise, Benson Margulies, Hervé Boutemy +1 (binding): Robert Scholte I will promote the artifacts to the centra

Re: Jsr305, Take 2

While there is a @Tainted annotation, I could not find any GPL stuff :) Seems straight BSD to me. (http://jsr-305.googlecode.com/svn/trunk) Kristian 2014-09-22 18:55 GMT+02:00 Igor Fedorenko : > I haven't checked version 3.0.0, but version 1.3.9 used to have sources > with GPL headers and was

Re: Jsr305, Take 2

I haven't checked version 3.0.0, but version 1.3.9 used to have sources with GPL headers and was rejected by Eclipse IP team. Probably worth to double-check this has been cleaned up. -- Regards, Igor On 2014-09-22, 12:14, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: com.google.code.findbugs

Re: Jsr305, Take 2

And I don't really think there's much point in annotating maven core with these values, I'm not sure there's enough guaranteed consistency anywhere to actually make it worthwhile. it seems like annotating shared code and libraries is the most useful. Kristian 2014-09-22 18:33 GMT+02:00 Kristian

Re: Jsr305, Take 2

And, included with a "provided" scope we're not forcing these annotations on anyone. But they do give marvelous IDE support :) Kristian 2014-09-22 18:32 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold : > Yeah, it seems to me like they just abandoned the JCP but kept the > name. So "dormant" refers to the JCP proj

Re: Jsr305, Take 2

Yeah, it seems to me like they just abandoned the JCP but kept the name. So "dormant" refers to the JCP project, not the actual findbugs module we're talking about here, which has a decent release frequency. Kristian 2014-09-22 18:19 GMT+02:00 Paul Benedict : > Just so everyone knows, JSR 305 is

Re: Jsr305, Take 2

Just so everyone knows, JSR 305 is in "dormant" status. Whatever annotations you use aren't "standard" annotations since the JSR never completed. Cheers, Paul On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Kristian Rosenvold < kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > com.google.code.findbugs >

Re: Jsr305, Take 2

com.google.code.findbugs jsr305 3.0.0 provided The reason for this is that the findbugs project has been evolving these annotations at a pace, and I would now also like to use @CheckForNull, @CheckReturnValue, @OverridingMethodsMustInvokeSuper, @WillC

Jsr305, Take 2

Some time ago, we discussed using the JSR305 annotations. At the time we discussed @Nonnull and @Nullable, and it turned out that those two annotations are "named based" in most analysis-tools; you can make your own org.apache.maven.annotations.Nonnull/Nullable and have a reasonable chance of havin

[GitHub] maven-scm pull request: SCM-781: Added a recursive goal to validat...

GitHub user Batmat opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/20 SCM-781: Added a recursive goal to validate scm URL. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Batmat/maven-scm SCM-781 Alternatively yo

Re: Problem while getting injected parameters from plugin configuration.

On 21 Sep 2014, at 22:54, animator wrote: > Thanks for answers! > > I removed reporting section and unfortunately it doesn't work.. (*1)(btw. > before that I added reporting api and declared InstrumentMojo extends > AbstractMavenReport but this doesn't work too). > > I suppose may be there is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Clean Plugin version 2.6

Hi, sorry > Hi, We solved N issues: This should be written as: We solved 2 issues... Kind regards Karl-Heinz Marbaise http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11128&version=18533 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=projec

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 2.10

Hi Mark, Please file an issue in JIRA about this. If you attach a small Maven project that highlights your problems we have something to work with, and can hopefully convert that into an integration test. On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > Hrm, just tried updating to this:

Early Access builds for JDK 9 b31 and JDK 8u40 b06 are available on java.net

Hi Robert & Kristian, Early Access build for JDK 9 b31 is available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here Early Access build for JDK 8u40 b06 is availab