I would recommend that you instead update the existing wiki page that we
use to gather "tips" about migrating plugins:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Plugin+migration+to+Maven3+dependencies
Kristian
2016-01-08 1:18 GMT+01:00 Tibor Digana :
> Hi Andreas,
>
> See Robert's cha
If there would be a vote about questions written below, I'd vote +1 to all
of them:
- No any kind of logging backend should enter core, ever. Project already
agreed on use of SLF4j _facade_ (I consider slf4j as NOT violating this
requirement. It is very elastic by letting you choose backend for it
> On Jan 7, 2016, at 9:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>> No, I don’t that useful. If it’s an extensions then it can be activated
>> using the .mvn/extensions.xml and downloaded on demand. I think for Maven
>> 4.x we just bite the bullet an
+1
2016-01-07 18:59 GMT+01:00 Tibor Digana :
> `+1
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Tibor Digana-2 [via Maven] <
> ml-node+s40175n5858080...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 4 issues:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317921&version=
Ralph,
The simple fact of the matter is that Log4J2 appears to have little to no user
traction at all. This suggests to me that the community forked into the next
generation by way of Logback and Log4J2. The community appears to have gone in
the direction of Logback. By a very large margin, at
Github user michael-o commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/13#issuecomment-169988105
Just trying to run the ITs without your patch first.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Hi Kristian,
I do not have edit permissions in confluence. Who can grant me?
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Kristian Rosenvold-4 [via Maven] <
ml-node+s40175n5858379...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> I would recommend that you instead update the existing wiki page that we
> use to gather "tips" about
On traction we can agree to disagree. Logback may be more popular but we are
pretty busy answering user's questions, and making enhancements and fixes. I
follow the Logback lists and actually see less activity there. And I continue
to see users ask frameworks to support Log4j 2. Frankly, I was s
Github user michael-o commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/13#issuecomment-170016837
Seems like I can't run the tests in a locked down environment, regardless
of a Nexus instance and am HTTP proxy. Artifact resolution always points to
Github user atanasenko commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/13#issuecomment-170025305
I've had troubles running tests when following official guidelines [1].
But changing 'mvn clean test ...' to 'mvn clean install ...' helped.
FYI, a new idea to solve our modulepath issue.
Any feedback is appreciated.
thanks,
Robert
Forwarded Message Subject:Specifying module paths
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:39:43 -0800
From: Jonathan Gibbons
To: jigsaw-dev
This is a follow-up to some of the recent em
It sounds like Maven will have to generate many .properties file in a build.
1) Modules to compile main source
2) Modules to compile test source
3) Modules to execute tests
4) And what about forking?
I am concerned #4 is going to create issues unless the .properties file
name is unique enough. Per
Hi,
The sometimes heated discussion in this thread shows that there are strong
opinions about logging implementation. That for me is a reason to not
bundle one by default.
Let us focus on making it as simple as possible for our end users to
configure which one they want to use.
I'm not familiar
Hi folks,
I cannot pass any core IT w/ external resolution. The outcome in the
logs is almost the same:
"could not find artifact org.apache.maven:maven-settings:jar:2.0 in
central (file:target/null)" and alike.
Running tests with Maven 3.3.3 with
mvn clean install -Prun-its
-Dmaven.it.cent
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:12 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > On Jan 7, 2016, at 9:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> >
> >> No, I don’t that useful. If it’s an extensions then it can be activated
> >> using the .mvn/extensions.xml and downloa
Adding maven-compat for the test did the trick for now in my case. If only
I had read that wiki page before, because it actually describes this
already... :-D
2016-01-08 14:55 GMT+01:00 Tibor Digana :
> Hi Kristian,
>
> I do not have edit permissions in confluence. Who can grant me?
>
> On Fri,
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/96#issuecomment-170148843
@lamyaa
Hi how are you?
We should recover activity on this issue. As for your information, I
created a separate branch 3.0-rc1 and the master branch is re
You’re welcome. I do try to bring a chuckle to everyone’s day.
> On Jan 8, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:12 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>>
>>> On Jan 7, 2016, at 9:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
> On Jan 8, 2016, at 3:21 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The sometimes heated discussion in this thread shows that there are strong
> opinions about logging implementation. That for me is a reason to not
> bundle one by default.
>
> Let us focus on making it as simple as possible for o
So, just for fun (and healing flue):
https://github.com/apache/maven/compare/slf4j-gossip
Does colouring by default in 80kb "extra" payload (but removes slf4-simple
and many other cruft).
Now, _the theory_ says, that an extension could do
Log.configure( ILoggerFactory )
And from that moment on
Github user lamyaa commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/96#issuecomment-170191124
@Tibor17
Hi Tibor. I'm doing great, thanks. Congrats on the release! :)
I'll work on this in the next couple of days to resolve conflicts and test
it again
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/96#issuecomment-170199857
>>Should I then make a new pull request for 3.0-rc1?
no, no. Just keep going in the master. Thx.
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 5:15 AM, lamyaa wrote:
22 matches
Mail list logo
