+1
Java 1.8.0_74
Mac OS X 10.12.3
Multi-module project with 562 goals (50 unique)
Chas
> On Apr 3, 2017, at 3:14 PM, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We solved 86 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922&version=12336084&styleName=Text
>
> In
This Vote was canceled and a new TAKE 2 was sent to ML.
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 65 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12317927&version=12334636
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> https
Hi,
We solved 68 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927&version=12334636
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#issues/?jql=project+%3D+SUREFIRE+AND+status+%3D+Open+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC
Staging repo:
https://
Github user stefaneicher closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/111
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
+1 non-binding after testing with a bunch of different projects on MacOS
10.11.6 (15G31)
Darwin Elliots-iMac.fios-router.home 15.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 15.6.0:
Thu Jun 23 18:25:34 PDT 2016; root:xnu-3248.60.10~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.a
+1 after testing with a lot of different projects
On Thu 6 Apr 2017 at 00:01, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 4 April 2017 at 08:14, Stephen Connolly > com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We solved 86 issues:
> > > h
+1
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> +1
>
> On 4 April 2017 at 08:14, Stephen Connolly com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 86 issues:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> > projectId=12316922&version=12336084&styleName=Text
> >
> > In there are
Github user khmarbaise commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/111
This pull request has been integrated into maven core. Thanks for your
support. Please close this pull request.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user khmarbaise commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/111
If you add the JIRA ticket this PR is automatically added to the JIRA
ticket...Thanks for this..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
Hello Tibor,
I've just tried with a local build from the SUREFIRE-1354 branch and I can
confirm the issue is gone. I've executed 50 builds on the same config as
before.
Thanks,
Petr
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:10 PM Tibor Digana
wrote:
> @Michael
> Hi Michael,
> A new branch was created
> SUREFIR
GitHub user stefaneicher opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/111
[MNG-6203] Minor cleanup in MavenCli.java
There is some unnecessary code in the MavenCli.java from line #1465 to
#1474.
The functionality has been moved to line #1215.
Signed-off-by
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/145
@flungo
Thank You for the fix and let them coming more.
Your fix has been merged to master.
Please close this pull request.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1355
FYI, it's SUREFIRE-1262[1] where most of the details are for implementing
this.
Robert
[1] htps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1262
On Wed, 05 Apr 2017 19:08:27 +0200, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
Hi Tibor,
Tibor Digana wrote:
Hi Joerg,
We will continue on this issue after this re
Hi,
I am cancelling the first vote.
I will start new Vote in a while.
Cheers,
Tibor
@Michael
Hi Michael,
A new branch was created
SUREFIRE-1354.
@Petr
Please build the project
mvn install -DskipTests
and check it out in your project with version 2.20-SNAPSHOT.
git clone -b SUREFIRE-1354 https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Michael Osipov wr
Am 2017-04-05 um 19:02 schrieb Tibor Digana:
Yes, I will cancel it, and I will add few more fixes too.
Good, tell me when you are ready. I will retest trunk before you prepare
the release.
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2017-04-05 um 17:20 schrieb Tibor Digana:
Hi Tibor,
Tibor Digana wrote:
> Hi Joerg,
>
> We will continue on this issue after this release.
> Would you help us with your Java 9 knowhow?
actually, I am completely lost with Java 9 for now. I simply assumed that
someone managed to run the unit tests by now that opens access to some class
Yes, I will cancel it, and I will add few more fixes too.
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
> Am 2017-04-05 um 17:20 schrieb Tibor Digana:
>
>> I found the issue.
>> In ForkedBooter we call
>>
>> encodeAndWriteToOutput( ( (char) BOOTERCODE_BYE ) + ",0,BYE!\n",
>> originalOut
Am 2017-04-05 um 17:20 schrieb Tibor Digana:
I found the issue.
In ForkedBooter we call
encodeAndWriteToOutput( ( (char) BOOTERCODE_BYE ) + ",0,BYE!\n", originalOut );
We expect the Maven process to respond.
This happens but the listener which is expected to listen to BYE_ACK from
Maven process
GitHub user flungo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/145
Close reportSets tag
Close the `` tag in the usage documentation for "Reporting
integration test results".
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull h
I found the issue.
In ForkedBooter we call
encodeAndWriteToOutput( ( (char) BOOTERCODE_BYE ) + ",0,BYE!\n", originalOut );
We expect the Maven process to respond.
This happens but the listener which is expected to listen to BYE_ACK from
Maven process is registered after this sending BYE and not b
Hi Joerg,
We will continue on this issue after this release.
Would you help us with your Java 9 knowhow?
We have a ticket with Java9 issue in Jira.
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anyone already have a setup to execute surefire with Java 9 where the
> tested
>From the Thread dump it is obvious that Maven process does not send stream
to the forked jvm.
Forked JVM is waiting for the data to be received.
Therefore we need to find a way to grab the stream.
Another alternative is to dump it in the code, but this is dejavu because
we were doing this in FreeB
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:13 PM Tibor Digana
wrote:
> What I see in the thread dump is
> that ForkedBooter sent event BOOTERCODE_BYE, waiting for BYE_ACK from
> master process in CommandReader.
>
> Are you able to dump native stream stdout/in of forked JVM?
>
Not sure I understand what this means.
What I see in the thread dump is
that ForkedBooter sent event BOOTERCODE_BYE, waiting for BYE_ACK from
master process in CommandReader.
Are you able to dump native stream stdout/in of forked JVM?
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Petr Široký wrote:
> I've just tried on Windwos 2012R2 + Maven 3.2
I've just tried on Windwos 2012R2 + Maven 3.2.3 and RHEL 7.3 + Maven 3.2.5.
The 30s wait is somehow intermittent. I can still reproduce on those
platforms, but it takes 10 or 15 tries. On Fedora 25 it happens almost
always (but I have seen it pass also there).
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:50 AM Tibor
On my side okay (Maven 3.5.0 Win7).
I will check it out on Fedora and Ubuntu.
mvn test
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO]
[INFO]
[INFO] Building surefire-2_20-slowdown-reproducer 1.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO]
--
Hi,
does anyone already have a setup to execute surefire with Java 9 where the
tested code requires the opening of some modules? I already tried with
different configuration stuff, but failed so far.
Cheers,
Jörg
-
To unsubsc
@Peter
Thx for the test.
I have created a new topic for it in ML: surefire-2_20-slowdown-reproducer
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Petr Široký wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've tried with several projects and functionally, everything seems OK.
>
> However, I noticed certain slowdown in case multiple f
Discussion to Release Vote of Surefire 2.20.
Project to reproduce an issue
https://github.com/psiroky/surefire-2_20-slowdown-reproducer
Forked JVM is waiting 30 seconds to die.
I guess the JVM does not exit due to non-daemon threads.
Question is why we can see RMI Threads however no test is using
Hello,
I've tried with several projects and functionally, everything seems OK.
However, I noticed certain slowdown in case multiple forks are beings used
to run the tests. After some investigation, it seems one of the forked VMs
gets "stuck" for about 30s before it gets shutdown. So every surefir
Github user tstupka closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/pull/12
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
32 matches
Mail list logo