Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.0.0 (take 2)

that works because OpenJDK uses module-source-path, i.e. src//<*.java> Maven uses source-path because it matches exactly one module , i.e. src/main/java/<*.java> Aggregator for modules requires to make use of module-source-paths. I guess we need to consider to make use of symbolic links :(

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.0.0 (take 2)

On 2017-11-18T17:44:23 +0100 Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > JDK javadoc seems to cover the "aggregated javadocs" scenario: in Java 9 > terms, that's "multi-modules" = exactly the case for JDK 9 javadoc [1] > I don't know what's the command line to produce this, but looks feasible

Re: Second MNG-6296: New option -Dstyle.color is not working

I was actually going to ask on the list eventually. Tried using it with -B to no success a few days ago. I've also had no luck finding where this option is documented on the maven site. The only place to look was in the Jira and PR, but those mostly have the syntax that's not actually what was

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.0.0 (take 2)

JDK javadoc seems to cover the "aggregated javadocs" scenario: in Java 9 terms, that's "multi-modules" = exactly the case for JDK 9 javadoc [1] I don't know what's the command line to produce this, but looks feasible from javadoc side Regards, Hervé [1]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.0.0 (take 2)

Le samedi 18 novembre 2017, 17:18:06 CET Mark Raynsford a écrit : > On 2017-11-18T16:14:04 + > > Mark Raynsford wrote: > > Presumably, with the module-info.java files > > excluded, it reverts back to plain classpath style JavaDoc. > > Actually, it results in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.0.0 (take 2)

On 2017-11-18T16:14:04 + Mark Raynsford wrote: > Presumably, with the module-info.java files > excluded, it reverts back to plain classpath style JavaDoc. Actually, it results in sort of weird looking JavaDoc that only contains a single module, and claims that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.0.0 (take 2)

On 2017-11-18T17:04:12 +0100 "Robert Scholte" wrote: > That's similar to MJAVADOC-479[1] > > Seems like all Java 9 issues are not resolved yet. > I don't mind canceling the vote if we can fix this as well. > > thanks, > Robert > > [1]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.0.0 (take 2)

n.u...@io7m.com> wrote: Hello! I'd like to vote on this issue, but I still have a remaining problem and am not sure if it's because the plugin is broken due to the new module changes, or just because my project setup is slightly unusual. See here: https://github.com/io7m/maven-javadoc-bug-20

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.0.0 (take 2)

Hello! I'd like to vote on this issue, but I still have a remaining problem and am not sure if it's because the plugin is broken due to the new module changes, or just because my project setup is slightly unusual. See here: https://github.com/io7m/maven-javadoc-bug-20171118 The "c&qu

Second MNG-6296: New option -Dstyle.color is not working

Hi, MNG-6220[1] was incomplete, which will be fixed with MNG-6296[2]. Commit: https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git;a=commit;h=b2afafe5 CI: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.x-jenkinsfile/job/MNG-6296/ Who wants to second this? thanks, Robert

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.0.0 (take 2)

Hi, We solved 27 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529=12330875=Text There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

[CANCELED] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.0.0

Issue found related to a Maven multimodule projects and Java 9 module descriptors. This needs to be fixed for 3.0.0. thanks, Robert On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 18:37:16 +0100, Robert Scholte wrote: Hi, We solved 26 issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.0.0

Hi Mark, thanks for testing. I can confirm the problem. I'll cancel the vote and roll out another release based on your patch. thanks, Robert On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:46:51 +0100, Mark Raynsford wrote: On 2017-11-17T19:00:54 + Mark Raynsford

Re: Download links

found something that can explain: when using the real url starting with / components/, the CGI script works [4] But not when using the user-visible url (that uses .htaccess rewrite rules) [5] INFRA Jira issue opened: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15513 Regards, Hervé [4]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.0.0

On 2017-11-17T19:00:54 + Mark Raynsford wrote: > -1 (non-binding) > > The staged version still fails with a basic module setup: > > https://github.com/io7m/maven-javadoc-bug-20171117 I've submitted a PR that I believe fixes the issue, but I'm not sure if

[GitHub] maven-plugins pull request #137: [MJAVADOC-489] Find the main module descrip...

GitHub user io7m opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/137 [MJAVADOC-489] Find the main module descriptor The existing code was checking for the existence of a file "src/main/module-info.java" relative to the current directory. The problem is

[GitHub] maven-plugins pull request #136: [MDEP-584] Update plexus-utils to 3.1.0

GitHub user io7m opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/136 [MDEP-584] Update plexus-utils to 3.1.0 This updates the plexus-utils dependency to 3.1.0. It corrects four unit tests that were failing due to new behaviour in 3.1.0: It appears that

[GitHub] maven-plugins pull request #135: [MDEP-584] Update plexus-utils to 3.1.0

Github user io7m closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/135 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org