Jason, the board has not leaked the information, so rest assured
it was not from us. Also rest assured that no one questions
Sonatypes committment to the users nor your pursuit of innovation.
We only question why Sonatype refuses to attribute Maven as
a mark of the ASF, even after I was assured by
rk, working toward and eventually becoming a member of the Apache
> Board.
>
> We also have the example http://www.tomcatexpert.com/ which also seems to be
> fine, and you'll note this original infraction occurred while Jim Jagielski
> was involved with SpringSource. Jim
Not sure what there is to "sort out"... But of course,
you are also welcome to get on the phone and sort it
out as well.
On Jun 17, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Jim, just get on the phone and sort it out. It's not that hard.
>
> On Jun 17, 2011, at 9:09
The below shows that you are extremely out of touch regarding
what has been going on. As such, I have no problems with
ignoring it.
On Jun 17, 2011, at 9:55 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> The bottom line is that this is likely easy to resolve very quickly. A call
> between a representative Apache bo
t's done and we can move forward and
> do what's best for the Maven project and more importantly Maven users.
>
> On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> The below shows that you are extremely out of touch regarding
>> what has been going on
Jason,
Your synopsis is pretty much complete and total hogwash. Except for
the board action, the PMC has been very, very involved for quite a
long time. Since you are not on the PMC, maybe you didn't know that.
In which case, please don't attempt to "imagine" what is happening;
reality is sooo muc
