Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-22 Thread John Casey
done. I'll finish up the log4j stuff this morning and hopefully have a new RC out for testing this afternoon. Benjamin Bentmann wrote: John Casey wrote: Okay, I'm retracting this vote to fix: MNG-4210 MNG-4213 As a suggestion, probably worth to consider merging MNG-4179 in from the 2.2.x

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-22 Thread John Casey
I've added this sort of configuration, but I need to document it. I've got a proposed next release of wagon staged, and as soon as I get the documentation for this configuration done, I'll call the vote. -john Brett Porter wrote: On 20/06/2009, at 2:29 AM, Brian Fox wrote: This is

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-22 Thread nicolas de loof
Just as a side note, I don't thing the wiki page http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Maven+2.2.0+Release+Plan is up to date with current release candidate, is it ? Nicolas 2009/6/22 John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org I've added this sort of configuration, but I need to document it. I've got

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-21 Thread Brett Porter
On 20/06/2009, at 2:29 AM, Brian Fox wrote: This is probably a rare situation but does present itself like a regression. On the flip side, I would love to be able to enable pre-emptive authentication but I would want to do it per server. This would have the effect of halving the requests and

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-20 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
John Casey wrote: Okay, I'm retracting this vote to fix: MNG-4210 MNG-4213 As a suggestion, probably worth to consider merging MNG-4179 in from the 2.2.x branch as well. Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-19 Thread Reinhard Nägele
+1 [non-binding] Tested with a couple of multi-module projects, especially looking at MNG-4140. John Casey schrieb: Hi, I'm opening a new vote for Maven 2.2.0 after closing: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4169 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4207 All URLs below have been updated

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-19 Thread Lukas Theussl
+1 -Lukas John Casey wrote: Hi, I'm opening a new vote for Maven 2.2.0 after closing: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4169 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4207 All URLs below have been updated where appropriate. --- Okay, it looks like there haven't been many problems

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-19 Thread Paul MERLIN
+1 Tested on some little oss project plus some corp. ones without any issue. Did not test the release cycle yet. /Paul Le jeudi 18 juin 2009 02:50:02, John Casey a écrit : Hi, I'm opening a new vote for Maven 2.2.0 after closing: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4169

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-19 Thread Christian Schulte
John Casey schrieb: Hi, I'm opening a new vote for Maven 2.2.0 after closing: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4169 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4207 All URLs below have been updated where appropriate. --- This version displays log4j:WARN No appenders could be

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-19 Thread John Casey
This would be because of the recent addition of log4j, which is now shaded into the Maven binary (bundled with a changed package structure to keep it out of the way of plugins' own log4j dependencies). httpclient is using log4j because it's available, but log4j doesn't have a configuration

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-19 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi John, John Casey wrote: This would be because of the recent addition of log4j, which is now shaded into the Maven binary (bundled with a changed package structure to keep it out of the way of plugins' own log4j dependencies). httpclient is using log4j because it's available, but log4j

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-19 Thread Brian Fox
I'm having trouble getting this version to work against my Nexus instance. I keep getting authorization errors even though it's setup for anonymous. Switching back to 2.1.0 works immediately. On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Jörg Schaiblejoerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote: Hi John, John Casey wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-19 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
John Casey wrote: but unless it's completely hiding all output I'd say we should fix it in 2.2.1. +1, btw I already created a JIRA [0] for this: Benjamin [0] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4210 - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-19 Thread John Casey
Can you elaborate on the errors? Do we need to file a JIRA for it? Brian Fox wrote: I'm having trouble getting this version to work against my Nexus instance. I keep getting authorization errors even though it's setup for anonymous. Switching back to 2.1.0 works immediately. On Fri, Jun 19,

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-19 Thread Brian Fox
Ok John and I looked into this further and here's what we found: Maven 2.2.0 (with the new wagon) is sending preemptive authentication. The reason it failed for me is I had a server entry for Nexus that matched my mirror setting. The auth in there was for another Nexus and not for my personal

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-19 Thread Christian Schulte
John Casey schrieb: This would be because of the recent addition of log4j, which is now shaded into the Maven binary (bundled with a changed package structure to keep it out of the way of plugins' own log4j dependencies). httpclient is using log4j because it's available, but log4j doesn't

[CANCELED] [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-19 Thread John Casey
Okay, I'm retracting this vote to fix: MNG-4210 MNG-4213 This puts wagon -beta-6 in the release train for Maven 2.2.0. I'll stage them both simultaneously for an RC period, then try to do the releases. -john John Casey wrote: Hi, I'm opening a new vote for Maven 2.2.0 after closing:

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-18 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 Tested with CXF and some of the profiles that don't work correctly with 2.1.0 work fine with 2.2.0. Dan On Wed June 17 2009 8:50:02 pm John Casey wrote: Hi, I'm opening a new vote for Maven 2.2.0 after closing: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4169

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-18 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2009/6/18 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org +1 Tested with CXF and some of the profiles that don't work correctly with 2.1.0 work fine with 2.2.0. Dan On Wed June 17 2009 8:50:02 pm John Casey wrote: Hi, I'm opening a new vote for Maven 2.2.0 after closing:

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-18 Thread Vincent Siveton
+1 Tested on Maven doxia, wagon, release and some plugins and Incubator shindig Cheers, Vincent 2009/6/17, John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org: Hi, I'm opening a new vote for Maven 2.2.0 after closing: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4169 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4207

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-18 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
John Casey wrote: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-022/ +1 Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-18 Thread Steve Ariantaj
+1 [non-binding] -Original Message- From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu] Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:36 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt) John Casey wrote: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-18 Thread Jesse McConnell
Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt) John Casey wrote: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-022/ +1 Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-18 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 tested the usual build/test cycle on a few projects an all works fine. Did not test releases though!. LieGrue, strub --- Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu schrieb am Do, 18.6.2009: Von: Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt

[VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-17 Thread John Casey
Hi, I'm opening a new vote for Maven 2.2.0 after closing: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4169 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4207 All URLs below have been updated where appropriate. --- Okay, it looks like there haven't been many problems with the latest RC of Maven 2.2.0.