Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Kenney Westerhof wrote: Wasn't the line ending stuff fixed in plexus-archiver a long time ago? Running the attached test case (which might well be added to the plexus-archiver, whenever it should be fixed) demonstrates: No. Where is the plexus archivers issue tracker so that I can file an

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX component plexus-archiver Jochen Wiedmann a écrit : Kenney Westerhof wrote: Wasn't the line ending stuff fixed in plexus-archiver a long time ago? Running the attached test case (which might well be added to the plexus-archiver, whenever it should be

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX component plexus-archiver Thanks, issue created. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread jerome lacoste
On 6/14/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kenney Westerhof wrote: Wasn't the line ending stuff fixed in plexus-archiver a long time ago? Running the attached test case (which might well be added to the plexus-archiver, whenever it should be fixed) demonstrates: No. Where is the

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
jerome lacoste wrote: I am not so sure this test is a valid test case. Continuations are supposedly allowed. Read my comment in your issue in Jira. I believe, you are misreading the specification. A continuation is defined as otherchar* newline. But otherchar is defined as anything but NUL,

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread jerome lacoste
On 6/14/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jerome lacoste wrote: I am not so sure this test is a valid test case. Continuations are supposedly allowed. Read my comment in your issue in Jira. I believe, you are misreading the specification. A continuation is defined as otherchar*

Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-10 Thread Mike Perham
This is a patch against 2.0.x maven-archiver which allows the user to override the default manifest entries placed by Maven and also cleans all manifest entries of linebreaks so invalid manifests with linebreaks are not created. We will also need to push this down to the jar plugin but do we want

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Mike Perham wrote: This is a patch against 2.0.x maven-archiver which allows the user to override the default manifest entries placed by Maven and also cleans all manifest entries of linebreaks so invalid manifests with linebreaks are not created. We will also need to

RE: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-10 Thread Jeff Jensen
-Original Message- From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 1:27 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Commit MJAR-38 On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Mike Perham wrote: Side note: I don't use Subversion daily - what's the command(s

RE: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-10 Thread Mike Perham
than pushing the original message down? It would certainly make interleaving replies easier. -Original Message- From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 1:27 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Commit MJAR-38 On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Mike Perham

RE: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-10 Thread Jeff Jensen
-Original Message- From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 1:37 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: RE: Commit MJAR-38 Side note: is there a way to get Outlook 2003 to quote like below (with indents) rather than pushing the original

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-10 Thread Carlos Sanchez
On 6/10/06, Jeff Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 1:27 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Commit MJAR-38 On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Mike Perham wrote: Side note: I don't use