On Aug 31, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
and the optional are:
* java 5 annotations
This would be swell :-) When is Maven slated for using Java 5 as the
base JVM? Is that still for 2.2?
--jason
-
To
On 3 Sep 07, at 4:32 AM 3 Sep 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Aug 31, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
and the optional are:
* java 5 annotations
This would be swell :-) When is Maven slated for using Java 5 as
the base JVM? Is that still for 2.2?
Yoav has already agreed so we just
As I noted before, if the ITs are reasonably under control with a way
for people to make them and submit them then I will cut alphas everyday.
Brian is pretty much done. Is that true Brian on the Archetype front?
And you were supposed to figure out the JIRA workflow and I am
supposed to do
Hi guys,
Could it be some work done on integrating archetypes for maven 2.1 ?
What i am thinking about is to enhance the settings model to permit
plugins to access some configuration when used without a project.
Like the repositories defined in active profiles.
Like plugin configuration like in
On 01/09/2007, at 2:27 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
As I noted before, if the ITs are reasonably under control with a
way for people to make them and submit them then I will cut alphas
everyday.
There's some known failures I'd like to fix, that's all. They are all
in JIRA.
Brian is
On 31 Aug 07, at 9:58 AM 31 Aug 07, Raphaël Piéroni wrote:
Hi guys,
Could it be some work done on integrating archetypes for maven 2.1 ?
Archetype should stand completely on its own. Should have nothing to
do with 2.1.
What i am thinking about is to enhance the settings model to
On 31 Aug 07, at 9:48 AM 31 Aug 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 01/09/2007, at 2:27 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
As I noted before, if the ITs are reasonably under control with a
way for people to make them and submit them then I will cut alphas
everyday.
There's some known failures I'd like to
Comments inlined
2007/8/31, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 31 Aug 07, at 9:58 AM 31 Aug 07, Raphaël Piéroni wrote:
Hi guys,
Could it be some work done on integrating archetypes for maven 2.1 ?
Archetype should stand completely on its own. Should have nothing to
do with 2.1.
As I noted before, if the ITs are reasonably under control with a way
for people to make them and submit them then I will cut alphas
everyday.
Brian is pretty much done. Is that true Brian on the Archetype front?
The archetypeNG plugin needs to be released before this is truly usable
by our
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to do a few things towards getting a 2.1 alpha out, and
wanted to look towards getting 2.1 itself a bit nearer. It seems like
we have too many things scheduled at the moment for 2.1, so here are a
few bits I've been looking at and was going to start
10 matches
Mail list logo
