On 12 Jul 07, at 11:39 AM 12 Jul 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
reset=truemode=hidesorter/order=DESCsorter/
field=priorityresolution=-1pid=10332fixfor=13535
most of these issues are assigned to you and John, are you going to be
able to do
+1, though perhaps finishing the Taxonomy pages first might be a plan
as I am sure an alpha of 2.1 will draw in new faces?
Andy
On 11 Jul 2007, at 16:15, John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
We've been trying for quite a long time to get into a mode of
faster, more incremental releases.
On 7/11/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11 Jul 07, at 8:15 AM 11 Jul 07, John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
We've been trying for quite a long time to get into a mode of
faster, more incremental releases. However, when it comes to
actually doing this, we seem married to the idea
Hi everyone,
We've been trying for quite a long time to get into a mode of faster,
more incremental releases. However, when it comes to actually doing
this, we seem married to the idea of pushing out impressive feature
lists with new releases.
I'd like to call an end to that practice,
++1. The JIRA for 2.1-alpha-1 needs to be culled back to just the
regressions, IMO. (Frankly, 2.1.x needs a big scythe run over it too
and some more modest goals set in terms of features to include).
The only other thing I'd note is that we had a list running of things
that needed to be
+1
let's make more releases so we can track the problems as the arise
On 7/11/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
++1. The JIRA for 2.1-alpha-1 needs to be culled back to just the
regressions, IMO. (Frankly, 2.1.x needs a big scythe run over it too
and some more modest goals set in terms
From the resource filtering discussion, it might be a really good idea to
get a list of schema changes that would be nice to get in and at least
get those into the 2.1 alpha so people can try them and comment on them
and such.
The three things on my list that I'd like to see are:
1) Do
+1
Emmanuel
John Casey a écrit :
Hi everyone,
We've been trying for quite a long time to get into a mode of faster,
more incremental releases. However, when it comes to actually doing
this, we seem married to the idea of pushing out impressive feature
lists with new releases.
I'd like to
+1 as we say in New England, it's time to Fish or Cut Bait. Lets get
something out there.
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 11:15 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Maven 2.1-alpha-1?
Hi everyone,
We've been trying for quite
None of these has been fleshed out into any sort of formal design,
right? I want to be clear about this: what I'm proposing is not a
feature-complete release of maven 2.1 that just has lingering bugs,
and it's not going to be without its regressions. We have a lot of
work in the trunk of
On 11 Jul 07, at 8:15 AM 11 Jul 07, John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
We've been trying for quite a long time to get into a mode of
faster, more incremental releases. However, when it comes to
actually doing this, we seem married to the idea of pushing out
impressive feature lists with new
11 matches
Mail list logo
