Ok, we already really had a passing vote to bring this over here that
was sat on due to the controversy raised, so I haven't changed my
vote there:
+1 to ArchetypeNG coming in
(Please make sure an IP clearance form is submitted for the code).
I already believe Raphaël has demonstrated
2007/7/2, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm interested to know if anyone else is having success with the
current code, though, given the number of +1's. I couldn't get it to
run at all - after 5 attempts and fixes I'd need to code read to get
any further. Not a blocker to bringing it across,
On 02/07/2007, at 4:54 PM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote:
Please add some jira and assign them to me.
I will only have time for this after the 15/07
(after holidays)
Bit too much to get in there just now - we don't need to rush that
part, I just wanted to make sure they were known.
Most
On 2 Jul 07, at 12:57 AM 2 Jul 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 02/07/2007, at 4:54 PM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote:
Please add some jira and assign them to me.
I will only have time for this after the 15/07
(after holidays)
Bit too much to get in there just now - we don't need to rush that
part, I
+1 on both counts.
-john
On Jun 29, 2007, at 2:28 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
After a fews weeks of sorting out some niggly details the new code
new by default will produce a functional archetype without user
intervention, and projects can be generated with the old and new
archetype
+1 and another, very cool
On 6/29/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great, that's 4 PMC members already so people can continue to comment
but I'll get Raphael to send in a CLA, and adjust the code for Apache.
On 28 Jun 07, at 11:28 PM 28 Jun 07, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
After a
+1 good plan,
Andy
On 29 Jun 2007, at 07:28, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
After a fews weeks of sorting out some niggly details the new code
new by default will produce a functional archetype without user
intervention, and projects can be generated with the old and new
archetype plugins. I
Great, that's 4 PMC members already so people can continue to comment
but I'll get Raphael to send in a CLA, and adjust the code for Apache.
On 28 Jun 07, at 11:28 PM 28 Jun 07, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
After a fews weeks of sorting out some niggly details the new code
new by default will
+1
Arnaud
On 29/06/07, Andrew Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 good plan,
Andy
On 29 Jun 2007, at 07:28, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
After a fews weeks of sorting out some niggly details the new code
new by default will produce a functional archetype without user
intervention, and
+1 for both.
Thanks,
Stéphane
On 6/29/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
After a fews weeks of sorting out some niggly details the new code
new by default will produce a functional archetype without user
intervention, and projects can be generated with the old and new
archetype
+1
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 2:29 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Migrate ArchetypeNG to Apache commit privs for Raphael
Hi,
After a fews weeks of sorting out some niggly details the new code new
by
Raphael already has a CLA on file, so there's no rush.
I'll take another look on Monday and vote then, I have other things
to do this weekend.
- Brett
On 30/06/2007, at 12:40 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Great, that's 4 PMC members already so people can continue to
comment but I'll get
12 matches
Mail list logo
