On 3 Sep 07, at 4:32 AM 3 Sep 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Aug 31, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
and the optional are:
* java 5 annotations
This would be swell :-) When is Maven slated for using Java 5 as
the base JVM? Is that still for 2.2?
Yoav has already agreed so we just n
On Aug 31, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
and the optional are:
* java 5 annotations
This would be swell :-) When is Maven slated for using Java 5 as the
base JVM? Is that still for 2.2?
--jason
-
To unsubscribe,
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to do a few things towards getting a 2.1 alpha out, and
wanted to look towards getting 2.1 itself a bit nearer. It seems like
we have too many things scheduled at the moment for 2.1, so here are a
few bits I've been looking at and was going to start running
>As I noted before, if the ITs are reasonably under control with a way
>for people to make them and submit them then I will cut alphas
everyday.
>Brian is pretty much done. Is that true Brian on the Archetype front?
The archetypeNG plugin needs to be released before this is truly usable
by our
Comments inlined
2007/8/31, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On 31 Aug 07, at 9:58 AM 31 Aug 07, Raphaël Piéroni wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Could it be some work done on integrating archetypes for maven 2.1 ?
> >
>
> Archetype should stand completely on its own. Should have nothing to
>
On 31 Aug 07, at 9:58 AM 31 Aug 07, Raphaël Piéroni wrote:
Hi guys,
Could it be some work done on integrating archetypes for maven 2.1 ?
Archetype should stand completely on its own. Should have nothing to
do with 2.1.
What i am thinking about is to enhance the settings model to permit
On 31 Aug 07, at 9:48 AM 31 Aug 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 01/09/2007, at 2:27 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
As I noted before, if the ITs are reasonably under control with a
way for people to make them and submit them then I will cut alphas
everyday.
There's some known failures I'd like to f
Hi guys,
Could it be some work done on integrating archetypes for maven 2.1 ?
What i am thinking about is to enhance the settings model to permit
plugins to access some configuration when used without a project.
Like the repositories defined in active profiles.
Like plugin configuration like in
On 01/09/2007, at 2:27 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
As I noted before, if the ITs are reasonably under control with a
way for people to make them and submit them then I will cut alphas
everyday.
There's some known failures I'd like to fix, that's all. They are all
in JIRA.
Brian is pretty
As I noted before, if the ITs are reasonably under control with a way
for people to make them and submit them then I will cut alphas everyday.
Brian is pretty much done. Is that true Brian on the Archetype front?
And you were supposed to figure out the JIRA workflow and I am
supposed to do t
10 matches
Mail list logo
