On 1/2/07, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On 12/22/06, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > If I understand correctly, the problem is that a 'staged' release
> > > still contains a SNAPSHOT keyw
Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On 12/22/06, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > If I understand correctly, the problem is that a 'staged' release
> > > still contains a SNAPSHOT keyword in the metadata/filename?
> >
> > Yes, that's th
On 22 Dec 06, at 10:03 PM 22 Dec 06, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 12/22/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/22/06, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > If I understand correctly, the problem is that a 'staged' release
On 22 Dec 06, at 9:45 PM 22 Dec 06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 12/22/06, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> If I understand correctly, the problem is that a 'staged' release
> still contains a SNAPSHOT keyword in the metadata/filename?
Y
On 12/23/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/22/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12/22/06, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > If I understand correctly, the problem is that a 'staged' rele
On 12/22/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/22/06, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > If I understand correctly, the problem is that a 'staged' release
> > still contains a SNAPSHOT keyword in the metadata/filename?
On 12/22/06, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> If I understand correctly, the problem is that a 'staged' release
> still contains a SNAPSHOT keyword in the metadata/filename?
Yes, that's the problem.
I would agree, but that's not ho
Comments inline...
Brett Porter wrote:
> Does this cover the whole topic?
>
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/BEA+Maven+Requirement+Documen
ts
I'd say that highlights a lot of the most important requirements; it's
probably best read together with the blog article as well.
http://darkfor
Comments inline...
> -Original Message-
> From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 5:07 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Who should use SNAPSHOT when? RE: The Future of the
Release
> Process.
>
> Hi,
>
OK, I've finally written up the Compass way of doing things. I've got
it as a blog article for easier reading (and HTML formatting), but I'm
also including the text below.
http://darkforge.blogspot.com/2006/12/compass-as-compared-with-mavens.ht
ml
In this article, I'll describe some of the diffe
Does this cover the whole topic?
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/BEA+Maven+Requirement
+Documents
I think it's all good - as long as it is all built on top of the
stuff we already have (including what Joakim is proposing). It will
probably require changes to many aspects of Maven
Hi,
If I understand correctly, the problem is that a 'staged' release still
contains a SNAPSHOT keyword in the metadata/filename?
Also, how would you see snapshot 'releases' without a snapshot keyword?
If there's no indicator (timestamp?) in the filename, you'll overwrite the
previous deployed
Hi Dan,
I think what you are describing is what you do at your work place,
and I think it might be good if you could give us a full description
of your system for folks here to help them understand exactly what it
is you're talking about. I probably know a little more about it then
most h
Thanks for a great e-mail Joakim. I wanted to chime in with my two
cents...
(I've been off the radar for a couple of months while waiting for
permission to sign my ICLA; it's in now, and I'm now back to paying more
careful attention to this process... forgive me if some of this has
already been
14 matches
Mail list logo