+0
If we do it, we should also split the issues and notifications.
Brett Porter wrote:
Any other opinions?
On 08/08/2008, at 6:26 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
2008/8/8 Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I was poking back through the archives for a couple of things related to
Maven core and was ha
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 17:59 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> Any other opinions?
>
> On 08/08/2008, at 6:26 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
>
> > 2008/8/8 Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> I was poking back through the archives for a couple of things
> >> related to
> >> Maven core and was having trou
Hi,
2008/8/12 Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Any other opinions?
+0 and agree with Paul or Arnaud comments.
Cheers,
Vincent
> On 08/08/2008, at 6:26 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
>
>> 2008/8/8 Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> I was poking back through the archives for a couple of things
Hi,
Same opinion as Arnaud.
--
Olivier
2008/8/12 Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +0
> In both cases I'll subscribe to these mailing lists and will continue to
> read them.
> Perhaps it can ease rules in mail clients
>
> Arnaud
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTE
Brett Porter wrote:
Any other opinions?
I can easily put mails from different lists back into the same post
folder if I want but splitting mails from the same list according to
their topic is more tricky ;-) So I am +1 for the split.
If this is made in time, we could update our parent POMs
+0
In both cases I'll subscribe to these mailing lists and will continue to
read them.
Perhaps it can ease rules in mail clients
Arnaud
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any other opinions?
>
>
> On 08/08/2008, at 6:26 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
>
> 2008/8/8
Any other opinions?
On 08/08/2008, at 6:26 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
2008/8/8 Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I was poking back through the archives for a couple of things
related to
Maven core and was having trouble since it was drowned out in plugin
development discussion and votes.
Consid
2008/8/8 Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I was poking back through the archives for a couple of things related to
> Maven core and was having trouble since it was drowned out in plugin
> development discussion and votes.
>
> Considering plugin dev occurs on more on the stable basis of previous
It sounds like a good idea, but I don't think it's that easy to split
apart. It seems like a lot of plugin issues still require fixes to the
core. That's been more evident since 2.0.8 when regressions became a
serious topic to tackle. I suggest the timing is not yet right to
split the list. Maybe g
I was poking back through the archives for a couple of things related
to Maven core and was having trouble since it was drowned out in
plugin development discussion and votes.
Considering plugin dev occurs on more on the stable basis of previous
versions of Maven it seemed to make some sens
10 matches
Mail list logo
