On 1 July 2013 08:17, Andreas Gudian andreas.gud...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/6/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com javascript:;:
The mission of the ASF is to release software as source, and to ensure
that the released source is available under the Apache Licence.
Excuse me but I have always understand
On 1 July 2013 07:18, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:20 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Reminder: all this thread is just about is adding the following lines
to vote e-mails:
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-javadoc
On 1 July 2013 07:18, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:20 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Reminder: all this thread is just about is adding the following lines
to vote e-mails:
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-javadoc
On 30 June 2013 23:33, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 June 2013 19:20, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
snip/
Reminder: all this thread is just about is adding the following lines
to vote e-mails:
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-javadoc-plugin-2.9.1
On 1 July 2013 21:29, dk...@apache.org wrote:
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 1a6bc6276 - b4dc8931f
Some updates to start working on a proper LICENCE/NOTICE
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/repo
Commit:
to ensure that releases are available under the Apache
License, and don't contain any suprises for the end users.
- Stephen
On 1 July 2013 03:56, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 July 2013 06:52, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Another problem: the NOTICE file contains
On 4 July 2013 12:52, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 July 2013 12:32, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 July 2013 11:05, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have asked the legal-discuss list for an opinion on test data sets and
license
On 4 July 2013 14:18, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 July 2013 22:29, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
wrote:
I will let Barrie decide on whether we *have to* cancel this vote because
of the issues he identified in the NOTICE file.
Sebb noticed it.
I just
is tasked with... :-(
- Stephen
On 1 July 2013 03:56, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 July 2013 06:52, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Another problem: the NOTICE file contains the following spurious
text
On 4 July 2013 23:47, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
On Jul 4, 2013, at 6:06 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 July 2013 20:35, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am withdrawing my -1 on the basis of the feedback I have received from
legal-discuss
On 5 July 2013 12:48, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release Apache Maven War Plugin 2.4.
We fixed 10 issue
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=18840styleName=TextprojectId=11150
Staging repository:
On 5 July 2013 14:27, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2013/7/5 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 5 July 2013 12:48, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release Apache Maven War Plugin 2.4.
We fixed 10 issue
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version
On 5 July 2013 12:48, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release Apache Maven War Plugin 2.4.
We fixed 10 issue
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=18840styleName=TextprojectId=11150
Staging repository:
On 5 July 2013 14:32, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 July 2013 12:48, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release Apache Maven War Plugin 2.4.
We fixed 10 issue
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=18840styleName=TextprojectId=11150
Staging
On 5 July 2013 14:43, Stephen Connolly steph...@apache.org wrote:
On 5 July 2013 14:32, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 July 2013 12:48, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release Apache Maven War Plugin 2.4.
We fixed 10 issue
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure
On 5 July 2013 14:46, Stephen Connolly steph...@apache.org wrote:
On 5 July 2013 14:43, Stephen Connolly steph...@apache.org wrote:
On 5 July 2013 14:32, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 July 2013 12:48, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release Apache Maven War Plugin
On 5 July 2013 16:36, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 3:21 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 July 2013 12:48, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release Apache Maven War Plugin 2.4.
We fixed 10 issue
http://jira.codehaus.org
The curent release candidate for Apache Maven War plugin 2.4 contains
the following file in the source zip:
maven-archiver/pom.properties
The file is not in SVN or the source jar
As far as I can tell it does not belong in the source zip.
The file is unlikely to do any harm, however the fact
is found, it can be investigated and fixed.
But the important thing to take from this is that the current release
vote checking process could (and should) be improved.
On 7/6/13 1:35 PM, John Casey wrote:
On 7/6/13 11:28 AM, sebb wrote:
The curent release candidate for Apache Maven War
On 7 July 2013 13:45, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote:
In this instance, these files are derived files, so does it matter?
I already said that this particular file is probably not an issue.
The issue is that the release process is clearly not infallible.
The assembly plugin does not
There is already a Perl tool to compare directory structures:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/releases/compare_dirs.pl
I use that, as well as a GUI compare tool.
Arnaud
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:31 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 July 2013 13:45, Chris Graham chrisgw
?) that will compare the content of an
archive with an scm tag checkout
Arnaud
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:31 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com javascript:;
wrote:
On 7 July 2013 13:45, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com javascript:;
wrote:
In this instance, these files are derived files, so does it matter?
I
On 7 July 2013 23:36, hbout...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hboutemy
Date: Sun Jul 7 22:36:42 2013
New Revision: 1500547
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1500547
Log:
added releases history
Added:
maven/site/trunk/content/apt/docs/history.apt (with props)
Added:
02:04:18 sebb a écrit :
On 7 July 2013 23:36, hbout...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hboutemy
Date: Sun Jul 7 22:36:42 2013
New Revision: 1500547
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1500547
Log:
added releases history
Added:
maven/site/trunk/content/apt/docs/history.apt (with props
On 8 July 2013 09:26, aherit...@apache.org wrote:
Author: aheritier
Date: Mon Jul 8 08:26:19 2013
New Revision: 1500602
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1500602
Log:
Revert commons-io upgrade. commons-io = 2.3 requires Java6 or later while we
are always supporting Java 5
-1
The commit
On 8 July 2013 10:36, steph...@apache.org wrote:
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 7bb5f1957 - 50a24e541
upgrade to rat:0.9 and defensively prepare for maven-parent 24
Warning: RAT 0.9 is a lot slower than 0.8 when scanning large files
that don't have a valid license.
Make sure it does
On 9 July 2013 07:19, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
see the pom:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/release/trunk/maven-release-manager/pom.xml
Maybe add a comment to the file referring to the POM ?
plexus-maven-plugin merge the content
I agree that's not the usual place :-)
On 12 July 2013 01:39, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi brian!
I found that only the jakarta-regexp-1.4 jar was in central, so 1.2, 1.3
and 1.5 (the last) were missing.
They can be found here: http://archive.apache.org/dist/jakarta/regexp/
I did find bsf-2.4.0, but under the bsf
On 12 July 2013 22:12, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We solved 3 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530styleName=Htmlversion=19426
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
As the subject says.
This was raised over a year ago and has not even attracted a single comment.
Please could someone look at the issue?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 12 July 2013 22:12, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We solved 3 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530styleName=Htmlversion=19426
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
On 13 July 2013 14:54, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
The vote has passed with the following:
+1 Binding: Arnaud, Stephen, Olivier, Hervé
+1 Non-binding: Stevo, Anders, Tony, Tamas, Baptiste, Mark, Mirko
I voted -1 (non-binding) because of the invalid NOTICE file (amongst
other reasons).
not a trivial matter for a program determine what goes in the
NOTICE file from machine-readable data.
Hopefully the next one will not take 7 months. I sent the first email out for
the first 3.1.0 on December 2nd, 2012 :-)
On Jul 13, 2013, at 10:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 July 2013 14:54
On 13 July 2013 19:01, rfscho...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rfscholte
Date: Sat Jul 13 18:01:39 2013
New Revision: 1502830
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1502830
Log:
[MINSTALL-95] Enhance documentation of install-file
Modified:
On 15 July 2013 23:26, aherit...@apache.org wrote:
Add ASL license header
Trivial nit: it's the AL header, i.e. Apache License header.
It's not a Software license per se.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 15 July 2013 23:26, aherit...@apache.org wrote:
Replace package.html with package-info.java
Warning: this will cause unnecessary compilations unless/until
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-205 is fixed.
-
To
On 15 July 2013 23:26, aherit...@apache.org wrote:
fix typo and use names from their respective POMs
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/commit/2fea34f7
Tree:
On 15 July 2013 23:26, aherit...@apache.org wrote:
Code cleanup - Maven requires Java 5+ : Remove unnecessary boxing
Not sure that's a good idea.
I've found quite a few bugs related to boxing in other projects.
For example, auto-unboxing a field that can sometimes be null may
cause an
On 15 July 2013 23:26, aherit...@apache.org wrote:
Code cleanup - Maven requires Java 5+ : Replace for and while loops by for
each
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/commit/d92746dc
Tree:
Commit
Then
Review
On 16 July 2013 00:15, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 July 2013 08:39, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
wrote:
Remember folks, we are CTR not RTC so we shouldn't be holding up getting
stuff done
I think I should be able to grok that, but
:
What was the hash for future reference? This is why sebb is sooo
right.
If
you have a unique coordinate, you're good for life, no matter what
gets
done to the SCM. (more or less)
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Arnaud Héritier
aherit...@gmail.com
wrote:
done
On 16 July 2013 22:37, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
Typo on my part. There are 48 things to change when updating a release.
I updated and triggered the publish an hour ago. I'm not sure when/how it
updates.
Should be immediate (within a few seconds), assuming svnpubsub is
running
On 16 July 2013 23:45, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
On Jul 16, 2013, at 5:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 July 2013 22:37, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
Typo on my part. There are 48 things to change when updating a release.
I updated and triggered the publish an hour
On 18 July 2013 09:36, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 Jul 2013, at 05:41, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I've got a regression here using the Swagger Maven Plugin [1] that looks
different to the Aether one. Before I go poking around further, I was
wondering if
On 18 July 2013 15:22, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
When Sisu with this fix is released I'll cut a 3.1.1.
+1
Now would be a good time to start fixing the NOTICE and LICENSE files.
:33 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 July 2013 15:22, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
When Sisu with this fix is released I'll cut a 3.1.1.
+1
Now would be a good time to start fixing the NOTICE
Which JIRA would that be?
On 18 July 2013 17:24, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
If it's not in JIRA it doesn't exist
On 18 July 2013 17:18, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 July 2013 16:35, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote:
There are open issues
ny best to
provide a description.
On Jul 18, 2013, at 10:39 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Which JIRA would that be?
On 18 July 2013 17:24, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
wrote:
If it's not in JIRA it doesn't exist
On 18 July 2013 17:18, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote
On 20 July 2013 03:46, ol...@apache.org wrote:
Author: olamy
Date: Sat Jul 20 02:46:30 2013
New Revision: 1505079
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1505079
Log:
document date format
Modified:
maven/site/trunk/content/apt/docs/history.apt
Modified:
On 19 July 2013 17:54, hbout...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hboutemy
Date: Fri Jul 19 16:54:44 2013
New Revision: 1504937
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504937
Log:
point to ASF license page instead of MPIR copy
Thank you!
Modified:
maven/site/trunk/content/site.xml
Modified:
On 21 July 2013 11:48, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Damned there are plenty of Apache projects which don't do that :-)
They will have to be fixed over time.
But in this case the plugin maven-remote-resources-plugin doesn't have
to be used anymore?
Because now we can have duplicate NL
is required, maybe a specific
ASF-ruleset
Robert
Op Sun, 21 Jul 2013 13:03:18 +0200 schreef sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 21 July 2013 11:48, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Damned there are plenty of Apache projects which don't do that :-)
They will have to be fixed over time
On 21 July 2013 13:09, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
Hi
Has anyone asked if we can use generated files instead?
Many of the ASF rules are written by people that have not concidered the
fact that things such as these can be automated. Therefore many of these
rules are stated in a
On 21 July 2013 13:22, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote:
Op Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:10:12 +0200 schreef sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 21 July 2013 12:39, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote:
Having a copy here does indeed mean we have to maintain it, unless we use
svn:externals
14:17:12 +0200 schreef sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 21 July 2013 13:09, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
Hi
Has anyone asked if we can use generated files instead?
Many of the ASF rules are written by people that have not concidered the
fact that things such as these can be automated
On 21 July 2013 13:38, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
Also keep in mind, there is likely a large difference between the
LICENSE/NOTICE files that would go into a source release than would go into
the binary convenience releases. 90% of the source NOTICE/LICESE files are
just plain
On 21 July 2013 14:05, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
2013/7/21 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 21 July 2013 13:30, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote:
Also, the files change relatively rarely once set up.
I thought you strongly believed in Murphy's Law...
Not sure how
On 21 July 2013 19:47, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
On Jul 21, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
Revert my change upping to RAT 0.9
Stupid plugin has major regression in performance, but 0.8 needs excludes
for git
Yup, just noticed that as
On 21 July 2013 14:39, denn...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dennisl
Date: Sun Jul 21 13:39:23 2013
New Revision: 1505380
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1505380
Log:
Remove spurious blank lines in generated NOTICE file.
Modified:
On 21 July 2013 21:23, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
On Jul 21, 2013, at 3:14 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 July 2013 19:47, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
On Jul 21, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
Revert my change upping
On 23 July 2013 19:23, Dennis Lundberg dennisl.apa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is the final release of this plugin. After this release it will
be retired, see separate vote thread for more info on that.
We solved 1 issue:
On 23 July 2013 20:45, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
This will be the final release of this shared component. After this
release it will retire from the Apache Maven project and move to the
Apache Archiva project. See separate vote thread about that.
We solved 6 issues:
On 25 July 2013 16:55, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
Den 25 jul 2013 16:08 skrev sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 23 July 2013 20:45, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
This will be the final release of this shared component. After this
release it will retire from
On 25 July 2013 17:50, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:34 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 July 2013 16:55, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
Den 25 jul 2013 16:08 skrev sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 23 July 2013 20:45, Dennis Lundberg denn
On 25 July 2013 12:17, ol...@apache.org wrote:
Author: olamy
Date: Thu Jul 25 11:17:41 2013
New Revision: 1506890
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1506890
Log:
Use Apache formatting rules.
pedantic mode
Strictly speaking, these are the Apache Maven formatting rules.
These rules are not the
On 25 July 2013 21:54, rfscho...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rfscholte
Date: Thu Jul 25 20:54:43 2013
New Revision: 1507123
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1507123
Log:
apply generics
Modified:
On 25 July 2013 22:55, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
Agreed. I'll tip my hand and give my opinion: PMC members should have an
Apache first mentality. They are gatekeepers and guardians of their
project. Spinning off critical code to other OSS organizations should be
frowned upon --
On 27 July 2013 23:31, Fred Cooke fred.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I've been guilty of it from time to time, as most have been,
especially years ago ;-)
Did you find any of the above useful? I hope so :-)
I don't know (yet), but I do know that it would be a lot easier to
reference as a web
On 29 July 2013 17:18, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
I was referring to the remote resources plugin which is associated with the
3.1.1 release.
I have not attempted to release 3.1.1 and I have not sent out any release
vote. I do intend to add what Sebb suggested by adding the revision
On 11 August 2013 15:02, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dennis Lundberg
dennisl.apa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:15 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 July 2013 17:50, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25
On 12 August 2013 20:10, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
I have now read the threads that are referring to, and have not found
a single link to any ASF rule stating that we need to include these
things in a VOTE thread.
So how do you propose that reviewers check the provenance of the
On 10 August 2013 13:27, denn...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dennisl
Date: Sat Aug 10 12:27:41 2013
New Revision: 1512672
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1512672
Log:
Add subversion keywords.
Modified:
, 2013 at 12:48 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 August 2013 13:27, denn...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dennisl
Date: Sat Aug 10 12:27:41 2013
New Revision: 1512672
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1512672
Log:
Add subversion keywords.
Modified:
maven/plugins/trunk/maven-gpg-plugin/src
On 13 August 2013 18:58, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:30 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 August 2013 20:10, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
I have now read the threads that are referring to, and have not found
a single link to any ASF rule
On 14 August 2013 10:23, Stephen Connolly steph...@apache.org wrote:
On 14 August 2013 09:47, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 August 2013 18:58, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:30 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 August 2013 20:10, Jason van Zyl
On 14 August 2013 11:13, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 August 2013 10:45, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 August 2013 10:23, Stephen Connolly steph...@apache.org wrote:
On 14 August 2013 09:47, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 August 2013 18:58, Dennis
On 14 August 2013 13:45, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
Hi,
We solved 5 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11391version=18924
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-093/
Subversion Revision: r1508060
Thanks.
However
:25:11 +0100 (Wed, 14 Aug 2013)
which unfortunately does not agree with the originally stated revision:
Subversion Revision: r1508060
I'll put it in the template for next time.
Thanks, that would save a lot of hassle for everyone.
On Aug 14, 2013, at 9:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote
On 14 August 2013 14:18, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 August 2013 14:14, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 August 2013 14:08, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
Here you go:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-remote-resources-plugin
On 14 August 2013 21:21, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:47 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 August 2013 18:58, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:30 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 August 2013 20:10, Jason
On 15 August 2013 10:08, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote:
What sebb does not appear to have understood or accepted, as Stephen has
endlessly pointed out, is that we vote on the source bundle, not a scm
revision, and that, strictly speaking a SCM is not even required (however
sensible
On 15 August 2013 14:16, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
What Sebb is doing is perfectly reasonable.
Thank you!
He's trying to assert that everything in the source ball actually comes from
source control and that no errant files have made their way into the
distribution. Right now we
On 15 August 2013 20:57, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:27 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 August 2013 14:16, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
What Sebb is doing is perfectly reasonable.
I agree. Checking that the source bundle is correct
On 16 August 2013 08:10, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:20 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 August 2013 20:57, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:27 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 August 2013 14:16, Jason
On 16 August 2013 09:32, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:52 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 August 2013 08:10, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:20 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 August 2013 20:57, Dennis
in it, and they won't know if it's what you
wanted it to have in it, or not.
Fred.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:24 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 August 2013 09:32, Dennis Lundberg denn
)
On 16 August 2013 13:17, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 August 2013 13:08, Fred Cooke fred.co...@gmail.com wrote:
They're deployed as a set, so what I want is the SHA1 or even MD5 of any
one of the set of uploaded files, such that I can confirm that the set is
the set that I am supposed
I thought you were going to include the SCM coordinates used to create
the tarballs?
It's particularly important here, because AFAICT the SCM coordinates
are not present in the POM.
If true, then it's not possible to verify the files in the source tarballs.
Also, AFAIK, the PMC agreed to include
On 8 September 2013 18:51, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
On Sep 8, 2013, at 1:12 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought you were going to include the SCM coordinates used to create
the tarballs?
Sorry, not intentional. I forgot.
It's particularly important here, because AFAICT
On 9 September 2013 20:56, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 September 2013 18:51, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
On Sep 8, 2013, at 1:12 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought you were going to include the SCM coordinates used to create
the tarballs
I've just realised that you said the hash is in the maven core jar.
That is a binary artifact, and has no direct relationship with the
source artifact on which people are supposed to be voting.
I don't think it's possible to tie the SCM tag to this vote thread
for the record without the hash (and
On 10 September 2013 14:23, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
On Sep 10, 2013, at 7:53 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just realised that you said the hash is in the maven core jar.
That is a binary artifact, and has no direct relationship with the
source artifact on which people
On 10 September 2013 15:11, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
On Sep 10, 2013, at 9:58 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 September 2013 14:23, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
On Sep 10, 2013, at 7:53 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just realised that you said the hash
On 10 September 2013 16:33, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
-1
The src.tar.gz and src.zip files have lost their top level NOTICE and LICENSE
files. This is a regression from 3.1.0 (and 3.0.5). That definitely needs
to be fixed. I don't have time today to look into that, but might
On 10 September 2013 16:33, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
-1
The src.tar.gz and src.zip files have lost their top level NOTICE and LICENSE
files. This is a regression from 3.1.0 (and 3.0.5). That definitely needs
to be fixed. I don't have time today to look into that, but might
On 12 September 2013 14:52, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:44 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 September 2013 16:33, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
-1
The src.tar.gz and src.zip files have lost their top level NOTICE and
LICENSE files
On 11 September 2013 21:40, dk...@apache.org wrote:
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 02d124230 - eb2f2b1ac
Add a LICENSE/NOTICE that can be picked up for the src assembly
Thanks, that also sorts out the top-level SCM NL files.
Project:
On 12 September 2013 18:20, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote:
The point is:
the NL files should be at the top-level of SCM.
That is because SCM URLs are published, so the readers need to know
the what the license conditions are.
For the License when you are reading some code
On 12 September 2013 21:52, Baptiste Mathus m...@batmat.net wrote:
2013/9/12 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 12 September 2013 14:52, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:44 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 September 2013 16:33, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org
On 14 September 2013 11:19, Baptiste Mathus bmat...@batmat.net wrote:
Le 13 sept. 2013 19:00, sebb seb...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 12 September 2013 21:52, Baptiste Mathus m...@batmat.net wrote:
2013/9/12 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 12 September 2013 14:52, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com
101 - 200 of 233 matches
Mail list logo
