Re: Replacement proposal for

Minor correction: the classes method will necessarily *detect* added sources, because they won't have a class file. What occurs as a result is another matter./ It might be worth considering forcing a full build as an option in such cases if there is any way that adding a new source file can affect

Re: Notes on maven-compiler-plugin work

On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 07:50, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > Since we'll go v4 and really change the impl I guess we can drop all the > compiler args from properties and the not relevant options. It would be helpful if there was a migration page that explained to users how to

Re: User friendly release notes

On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 08:18, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > > Howdy, > > What I usually do is copy-paste JIRA release notes to GH release notes: > https://github.com/apache/maven-gpg-plugin/releases/tag/maven-gpg-plugin-3.2.0 > > As this contains links to issues, but our JIRA does require account, so

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 17:01, Benjamin Marwell wrote: > > > Compiling for Java 8 with > > Java 17 -release 8 is not the same as compiling with javac from JDK 8. > > They do not produce the same byte code. There is a need to compile > > *with* JDK 8, not just compile *for* JDK 8. > > And when

Re: Replacement for Ant Mojo Extractor

On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 at 14:42, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > > niedz., 8 paź 2023 o 12:57 sebb napisał(a): > > > Is there a replacement for the Ant Mojo Extractor? > > I understand this will be dropped in Maven 4. > > > > The Commons project uses it in the build-plu

Replacement for Ant Mojo Extractor

? Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Removal of plugin scripting support in Maven 4 needs better docn

for Maven 4 don't appear to mention this breaking change: https://maven.apache.org/docs/4.0.0-alpha-7/release-notes.html Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven Archiver 3.4.0 released

On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 at 21:54, Michael Osipov wrote: > > The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache > Maven Archiver, version 3.4.0. > > https://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-archiver/ This mail is sent to multiple mailing lists. Not all recipients will be familiar

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven 3.5.4 Released

I notice that Maven release announcements are no longer sent to the ASF general announce list (announce@a.o) The last one I found was 3.0.5 in 2013 [1] Whilst it is unnecessary (and a bit noisy) to announce all plugin updates on the ASF list, IMO new Maven releases should be announced. [1]

Fwd: Error when processing doap file https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git;a=blob_plain;f=doap_Maven.rdf;hb=HEAD:

Looks like the DOAP has moved. Please update the projects.xml file accordingly. -- Forwarded message -- From: Projects Date: 21 March 2018 at 02:00 Subject: Error when processing doap file

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven 3.5.3 Released

What is the project about? Why should I be interested in it? [rhetorical questions] The Announce emails are sent to people not on the developer or user lists. Most will have no idea what the project is about. So the e-mails should contain at least brief details of what the product does, and some

Re: Download links

On 17 November 2017 at 11:27, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org> wrote: > This topic deserves a separate mailthread. > > Quoting Sebb on a different thread: > "The download link points to the top-level of the ASF mirror system. > > This makes it very hard to

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven JDeprScan Plugin 3.0.0-alpha-1 Released

On 17 November 2017 at 09:27, Robert Scholte wrote: > The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the first release of the Apache > Maven JDeprScan Plugin, version 3.0.0-alpha-1 > > The Maven JDeprScan plugin is used to scan class files for uses of > deprecated API

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven 3.5.0 Released

What is the project about? Why should I be interested in it? [rhetorical questions] The Announce emails are sent to people not on the developer or user lists. Many will have no idea what the project is about. So the e-mails should contain at least brief details of what the product does, and some

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven quarterly report

On 31 January 2015 at 01:33, Hervé Boutemy hbout...@apache.org wrote: As every ASF project, Apache Maven regularly reports to the Apache board about the status of the project. Our latest report (January 21st, 2014) is shown below: Apache Maven is a widely-used project build tool, targeting

Re: [ANN] Apache Common POM Version 16 Released

On 17 November 2014 19:57, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@apache.org wrote: The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Common POM, version 16. This POM (org.apache:apache) configures common Maven settings for projects to use ASF infrastructure. Documentation live

Re: [ANN] Apache Common POM version 15 released

On 28 September 2014 12:17, Benson Margulies bimargul...@apache.org wrote: The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Common POM, version 15. This POM (org.apache:apache) configures common Maven settings for projects to use ASF infrastructure. Documentation live

Re: Operating system requirement

On 28 March 2014 12:09, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote: The requirements also says: Disk No minimum requirement. Approximately 100MB will be used for your local repository, however this will vary depending on usage ... AFAICT there _is_ a minimum requirement which is needed to store a

Re: Operating system requirement

On 25 March 2014 21:42, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote: Under requirements [1], we're stating the following: No minimum requirement. On Windows, Windows NT and above or Cygwin is required for the startup scripts. Tested on Windows XP, Fedora Core and Mac OS X. What exactly are we

Re: Convert everything to Git

AIUI, SVN is still required by Infra because of svnpubsub: - for the dist repo (that is not a big deal) - for websites (might cause some grief) On 13 February 2014 03:37, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: Can we start the process of converting everything to Git. I don't really see any

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven SCM Publish Plugin 1.0 Released

. It was not difficult. Adding a note on the website and announce is a good idea. Too late this time for announce, but I'll modify site Thanks. And perhaps add something in the announce template Please. Regards, Hervé Le mercredi 5 février 2014 13:09:39 sebb a écrit : On 4 February 2014 07:23

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven SCM Publish Plugin 1.0 Released

On 4 February 2014 07:23, Hervé Boutemy hbout...@apache.org wrote: The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven SCM Publish Plugin, version 1.0 It looks as though the plugin now requires Maven 3, whereas 1.0-beta2 did not. Was that change intentional? If so, it

Re: Boy have we got a broken webpage

On 16 November 2013 21:02, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: ouch, strange: 'r' were replaced by 'n' Perhaps a botched attempt at changing line endings from (CR) to (LF) ? I just had a look at archive content, and it does not have the problem so I just copied archive content into

Re: [DISCUSS] Converting site documentation to Markdown

Regarding automatic conversion to Markdown: The main ASF site was converted from xdoc to Markdown. Some tools werr written for this, but they were not 100% accurate; we were still finding conversion issues a year or so later. [We've probably not found them all yet] Whether these conversion issues

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

On 22 September 2013 08:13, Mark Derricutt m...@talios.com wrote: On 22/09/2013, at 9:28 AM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: A check is performed to ensure that each file in the source archive is present in the release revision Should that not be the other way around? That every file in

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

On 22 September 2013 05:03, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: On Sep 21, 2013, at 7:44 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 September 2013 03:09, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: On Sep 21, 2013, at 6:16 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 21 September 2013 23:09, Jason van Zyl ja

Re: rules for Apache release and tooling to help cheking compliance

On 22 September 2013 09:49, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: Starting a separate thread to not pollute any vote. Isn't Apache Creadur the right place to: 1. discuss and refine Apache requirements No. 2. work on tooling Possibly. Regards, Hervé

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

. On Sep 20, 2013, at 5:40 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 September 2013 16:39, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: Hi, Maven Core ITs are good, and the license/notice issue has been resolved so I'm rolling 3.1.1 again. Here is a link to Jira with 6 issues resolved: https

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

On 21 September 2013 23:09, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: On Sep 21, 2013, at 2:51 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 21 September 2013 22:28, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: You will now be infamous :-) https://github.com/jvanzyl/sebbalizer If you don't like the name, happy

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

On 22 September 2013 03:09, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: On Sep 21, 2013, at 6:16 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 21 September 2013 23:09, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: It would still be automated. However the source data would come form the vote e-mail, which makes more

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

On 17 September 2013 16:39, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: Hi, Maven Core ITs are good, and the license/notice issue has been resolved so I'm rolling 3.1.1 again. Here is a link to Jira with 6 issues resolved:

Re: What is the top level of the source tree and what exactly is an Apache distribution?

On 16 September 2013 10:50, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: In an effort to get to a definitive answer for http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201309.mbox/%3CCA%2BnPnMwUvmaoOuBJ7dpVj9qAmwVnbfcxTid7UZgc6EdEL7%2BOpg%40mail.gmail.com%3EI did some

Re: Leaving Maven Core POMs at major.minor-SNAPSHOT

Some other ASF PMCs have no qualms about skipping version numbers. For example AIUI Tomcat creates a release candidate, and if the vote fails, they bump the patch version. For example they released 7.0.30 and 7.0.32; there is no 7.0.31. The other point I would make is that bumping the way the

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

On 14 September 2013 11:19, Baptiste Mathus bmat...@batmat.net wrote: Le 13 sept. 2013 19:00, sebb seb...@gmail.com a écrit : On 12 September 2013 21:52, Baptiste Mathus m...@batmat.net wrote: 2013/9/12 sebb seb...@gmail.com On 12 September 2013 14:52, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

On 12 September 2013 21:52, Baptiste Mathus m...@batmat.net wrote: 2013/9/12 sebb seb...@gmail.com On 12 September 2013 14:52, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:44 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 September 2013 16:33, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

On 10 September 2013 16:33, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: -1 The src.tar.gz and src.zip files have lost their top level NOTICE and LICENSE files. This is a regression from 3.1.0 (and 3.0.5). That definitely needs to be fixed. I don't have time today to look into that, but might

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

On 12 September 2013 14:52, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:44 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 September 2013 16:33, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: -1 The src.tar.gz and src.zip files have lost their top level NOTICE and LICENSE files

Re: git commit: Add a LICENSE/NOTICE that can be picked up for the src assembly

On 11 September 2013 21:40, dk...@apache.org wrote: Updated Branches: refs/heads/master 02d124230 - eb2f2b1ac Add a LICENSE/NOTICE that can be picked up for the src assembly Thanks, that also sorts out the top-level SCM NL files. Project:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

On 12 September 2013 18:20, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote: The point is: the NL files should be at the top-level of SCM. That is because SCM URLs are published, so the readers need to know the what the license conditions are. For the License when you are reading some code

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

I've just realised that you said the hash is in the maven core jar. That is a binary artifact, and has no direct relationship with the source artifact on which people are supposed to be voting. I don't think it's possible to tie the SCM tag to this vote thread for the record without the hash (and

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

On 10 September 2013 14:23, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: On Sep 10, 2013, at 7:53 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: I've just realised that you said the hash is in the maven core jar. That is a binary artifact, and has no direct relationship with the source artifact on which people

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

On 10 September 2013 15:11, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: On Sep 10, 2013, at 9:58 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 September 2013 14:23, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: On Sep 10, 2013, at 7:53 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: I've just realised that you said the hash

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

On 10 September 2013 16:33, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: -1 The src.tar.gz and src.zip files have lost their top level NOTICE and LICENSE files. This is a regression from 3.1.0 (and 3.0.5). That definitely needs to be fixed. I don't have time today to look into that, but might

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

On 9 September 2013 20:56, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 September 2013 18:51, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: On Sep 8, 2013, at 1:12 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: I thought you were going to include the SCM coordinates used to create the tarballs

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

I thought you were going to include the SCM coordinates used to create the tarballs? It's particularly important here, because AFAICT the SCM coordinates are not present in the POM. If true, then it's not possible to verify the files in the source tarballs. Also, AFAIK, the PMC agreed to include

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.1.1

On 8 September 2013 18:51, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: On Sep 8, 2013, at 1:12 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: I thought you were going to include the SCM coordinates used to create the tarballs? Sorry, not intentional. I forgot. It's particularly important here, because AFAICT

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

On 16 August 2013 08:10, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:20 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 August 2013 20:57, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:27 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 August 2013 14:16, Jason

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

On 16 August 2013 09:32, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:52 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 August 2013 08:10, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:20 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 August 2013 20:57, Dennis

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

in it, and they won't know if it's what you wanted it to have in it, or not. Fred. On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:24 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 August 2013 09:32, Dennis Lundberg denn

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

) On 16 August 2013 13:17, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 August 2013 13:08, Fred Cooke fred.co...@gmail.com wrote: They're deployed as a set, so what I want is the SHA1 or even MD5 of any one of the set of uploaded files, such that I can confirm that the set is the set that I am supposed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

On 15 August 2013 10:08, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote: What sebb does not appear to have understood or accepted, as Stephen has endlessly pointed out, is that we vote on the source bundle, not a scm revision, and that, strictly speaking a SCM is not even required (however sensible

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

On 15 August 2013 14:16, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: What Sebb is doing is perfectly reasonable. Thank you! He's trying to assert that everything in the source ball actually comes from source control and that no errant files have made their way into the distribution. Right now we

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

On 15 August 2013 20:57, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:27 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 August 2013 14:16, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: What Sebb is doing is perfectly reasonable. I agree. Checking that the source bundle is correct

Re: svn commit: r1512672 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-gpg-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/gpg/AbstractGpgSigner.java

, 2013 at 12:48 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 August 2013 13:27, denn...@apache.org wrote: Author: dennisl Date: Sat Aug 10 12:27:41 2013 New Revision: 1512672 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1512672 Log: Add subversion keywords. Modified: maven/plugins/trunk/maven-gpg-plugin/src

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

On 13 August 2013 18:58, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:30 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 August 2013 20:10, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: I have now read the threads that are referring to, and have not found a single link to any ASF rule

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

On 14 August 2013 10:23, Stephen Connolly steph...@apache.org wrote: On 14 August 2013 09:47, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 13 August 2013 18:58, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:30 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 August 2013 20:10, Jason van Zyl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

On 14 August 2013 11:13, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 August 2013 10:45, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 August 2013 10:23, Stephen Connolly steph...@apache.org wrote: On 14 August 2013 09:47, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 13 August 2013 18:58, Dennis

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Remote Resources Plugin 1.5

On 14 August 2013 13:45, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: Hi, We solved 5 issues: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11391version=18924 Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-093/ Subversion Revision: r1508060 Thanks. However

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Remote Resources Plugin 1.5

:25:11 +0100 (Wed, 14 Aug 2013) which unfortunately does not agree with the originally stated revision: Subversion Revision: r1508060 I'll put it in the template for next time. Thanks, that would save a lot of hassle for everyone. On Aug 14, 2013, at 9:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Remote Resources Plugin 1.5

On 14 August 2013 14:18, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 August 2013 14:14, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 August 2013 14:08, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: Here you go: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-remote-resources-plugin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

On 14 August 2013 21:21, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:47 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 13 August 2013 18:58, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:30 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 August 2013 20:10, Jason

Re: svn commit: r1512672 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-gpg-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/gpg/AbstractGpgSigner.java

On 10 August 2013 13:27, denn...@apache.org wrote: Author: dennisl Date: Sat Aug 10 12:27:41 2013 New Revision: 1512672 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1512672 Log: Add subversion keywords. Modified:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

On 11 August 2013 15:02, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dennis Lundberg dennisl.apa...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:15 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 July 2013 17:50, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 25

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

On 12 August 2013 20:10, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: I have now read the threads that are referring to, and have not found a single link to any ASF rule stating that we need to include these things in a VOTE thread. So how do you propose that reviewers check the provenance of the

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

On 29 July 2013 17:18, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: I was referring to the remote resources plugin which is associated with the 3.1.1 release. I have not attempted to release 3.1.1 and I have not sent out any release vote. I do intend to add what Sebb suggested by adding the revision

Re: Git resources was Re: [2/2] git commit: o change the scope of org.eclipse.sisu to test in the maven-aether-provider to prevent it from leaking out to clients.

On 27 July 2013 23:31, Fred Cooke fred.co...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I've been guilty of it from time to time, as most have been, especially years ago ;-) Did you find any of the above useful? I hope so :-) I don't know (yet), but I do know that it would be a lot easier to reference as a web

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven IDEA Plugin version 2.2.1

On 23 July 2013 19:23, Dennis Lundberg dennisl.apa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This is the final release of this plugin. After this release it will be retired, see separate vote thread for more info on that. We solved 1 issue:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

On 23 July 2013 20:45, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: Hi, This will be the final release of this shared component. After this release it will retire from the Apache Maven project and move to the Apache Archiva project. See separate vote thread about that. We solved 6 issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

On 25 July 2013 16:55, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: Den 25 jul 2013 16:08 skrev sebb seb...@gmail.com: On 23 July 2013 20:45, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: Hi, This will be the final release of this shared component. After this release it will retire from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

On 25 July 2013 17:50, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:34 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 July 2013 16:55, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: Den 25 jul 2013 16:08 skrev sebb seb...@gmail.com: On 23 July 2013 20:45, Dennis Lundberg denn

Re: svn commit: r1506890 - /maven/enforcer/trunk/maven-enforcer-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/enforcer/AbstractEnforceMojo.java

On 25 July 2013 12:17, ol...@apache.org wrote: Author: olamy Date: Thu Jul 25 11:17:41 2013 New Revision: 1506890 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1506890 Log: Use Apache formatting rules. pedantic mode Strictly speaking, these are the Apache Maven formatting rules. These rules are not the

Re: svn commit: r1507123 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-install-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/install: AbstractInstallMojo.java InstallFileMojo.java InstallMojo.java

On 25 July 2013 21:54, rfscho...@apache.org wrote: Author: rfscholte Date: Thu Jul 25 20:54:43 2013 New Revision: 1507123 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1507123 Log: apply generics Modified:

Re: [DISCUSS] Should the Maven PMC be an example of how we want the Maven Community to behave (was Re: svn commit: r1506778 - /maven/site/trunk/content/markdown/project-roles.md)

On 25 July 2013 22:55, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote: Agreed. I'll tip my hand and give my opinion: PMC members should have an Apache first mentality. They are gatekeepers and guardians of their project. Spinning off critical code to other OSS organizations should be frowned upon --

Re: svn commit: r1505129 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-install-plugin: LICENSE NOTICE

On 21 July 2013 11:48, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Damned there are plenty of Apache projects which don't do that :-) They will have to be fixed over time. But in this case the plugin maven-remote-resources-plugin doesn't have to be used anymore? Because now we can have duplicate NL

Re: svn commit: r1505129 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-install-plugin: LICENSE NOTICE

is required, maybe a specific ASF-ruleset Robert Op Sun, 21 Jul 2013 13:03:18 +0200 schreef sebb seb...@gmail.com: On 21 July 2013 11:48, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Damned there are plenty of Apache projects which don't do that :-) They will have to be fixed over time

Re: svn commit: r1505129 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-install-plugin: LICENSE NOTICE

On 21 July 2013 13:09, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: Hi Has anyone asked if we can use generated files instead? Many of the ASF rules are written by people that have not concidered the fact that things such as these can be automated. Therefore many of these rules are stated in a

Re: svn commit: r1505129 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-install-plugin: LICENSE NOTICE

On 21 July 2013 13:22, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote: Op Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:10:12 +0200 schreef sebb seb...@gmail.com: On 21 July 2013 12:39, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote: Having a copy here does indeed mean we have to maintain it, unless we use svn:externals

Re: svn commit: r1505129 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-install-plugin: LICENSE NOTICE

14:17:12 +0200 schreef sebb seb...@gmail.com: On 21 July 2013 13:09, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: Hi Has anyone asked if we can use generated files instead? Many of the ASF rules are written by people that have not concidered the fact that things such as these can be automated

Re: svn commit: r1505129 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-install-plugin: LICENSE NOTICE

On 21 July 2013 13:38, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: Also keep in mind, there is likely a large difference between the LICENSE/NOTICE files that would go into a source release than would go into the binary convenience releases. 90% of the source NOTICE/LICESE files are just plain

Re: svn commit: r1505129 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-install-plugin: LICENSE NOTICE

On 21 July 2013 14:05, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: 2013/7/21 sebb seb...@gmail.com: On 21 July 2013 13:30, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote: Also, the files change relatively rarely once set up. I thought you strongly believed in Murphy's Law... Not sure how

Re: RAT setup

On 21 July 2013 19:47, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: On Jul 21, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Revert my change upping to RAT 0.9 Stupid plugin has major regression in performance, but 0.8 needs excludes for git Yup, just noticed that as

Re: svn commit: r1505380 - in /maven/resources/trunk: apache-jar-resource-bundle/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE.vm apache-jar-txt-resource-bundle/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE.txt.vm pom.xml

On 21 July 2013 14:39, denn...@apache.org wrote: Author: dennisl Date: Sun Jul 21 13:39:23 2013 New Revision: 1505380 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1505380 Log: Remove spurious blank lines in generated NOTICE file. Modified:

Re: RAT setup

On 21 July 2013 21:23, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: On Jul 21, 2013, at 3:14 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 21 July 2013 19:47, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: On Jul 21, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Revert my change upping

Re: svn commit: r1505079 - /maven/site/trunk/content/apt/docs/history.apt

On 20 July 2013 03:46, ol...@apache.org wrote: Author: olamy Date: Sat Jul 20 02:46:30 2013 New Revision: 1505079 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1505079 Log: document date format Modified: maven/site/trunk/content/apt/docs/history.apt Modified:

Re: svn commit: r1504937 - /maven/site/trunk/content/site.xml

On 19 July 2013 17:54, hbout...@apache.org wrote: Author: hboutemy Date: Fri Jul 19 16:54:44 2013 New Revision: 1504937 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504937 Log: point to ASF license page instead of MPIR copy Thank you! Modified: maven/site/trunk/content/site.xml Modified:

Re: Maven 3.1.0 class loading error with Swagger Maven Plugin

On 18 July 2013 09:36, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com wrote: On 18 Jul 2013, at 05:41, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I've got a regression here using the Swagger Maven Plugin [1] that looks different to the Aether one. Before I go poking around further, I was wondering if

Re: Maven 3.1.0 class loading error with Swagger Maven Plugin

On 18 July 2013 15:22, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: When Sisu with this fix is released I'll cut a 3.1.1. +1 Now would be a good time to start fixing the NOTICE and LICENSE files.

Re: Maven 3.1.0 class loading error with Swagger Maven Plugin

:33 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 18 July 2013 15:22, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: When Sisu with this fix is released I'll cut a 3.1.1. +1 Now would be a good time to start fixing the NOTICE

Re: Maven 3.1.0 class loading error with Swagger Maven Plugin

Which JIRA would that be? On 18 July 2013 17:24, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: If it's not in JIRA it doesn't exist On 18 July 2013 17:18, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 18 July 2013 16:35, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote: There are open issues

Re: Maven 3.1.0 class loading error with Swagger Maven Plugin

ny best to provide a description. On Jul 18, 2013, at 10:39 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Which JIRA would that be? On 18 July 2013 17:24, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: If it's not in JIRA it doesn't exist On 18 July 2013 17:18, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote

Re: tags maven-3.1 vs maven-3.1.0

: What was the hash for future reference? This is why sebb is sooo right. If you have a unique coordinate, you're good for life, no matter what gets done to the SCM. (more or less) On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote: done

Re: Maven 3.1 - Stable ?

On 16 July 2013 22:37, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: Typo on my part. There are 48 things to change when updating a release. I updated and triggered the publish an hour ago. I'm not sure when/how it updates. Should be immediate (within a few seconds), assuming svnpubsub is running

Re: Maven 3.1 - Stable ?

On 16 July 2013 23:45, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: On Jul 16, 2013, at 5:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 July 2013 22:37, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: Typo on my part. There are 48 things to change when updating a release. I updated and triggered the publish an hour

Re: [08/50] git commit: Add ASL license header

On 15 July 2013 23:26, aherit...@apache.org wrote: Add ASL license header Trivial nit: it's the AL header, i.e. Apache License header. It's not a Software license per se. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [12/50] git commit: Replace package.html with package-info.java

On 15 July 2013 23:26, aherit...@apache.org wrote: Replace package.html with package-info.java Warning: this will cause unnecessary compilations unless/until https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-205 is fixed. - To

Re: [16/50] git commit: fix typo and use names from their respective POMs

On 15 July 2013 23:26, aherit...@apache.org wrote: fix typo and use names from their respective POMs Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/commit/2fea34f7 Tree:

Re: [25/50] git commit: Code cleanup - Maven requires Java 5+ : Remove unnecessary boxing

On 15 July 2013 23:26, aherit...@apache.org wrote: Code cleanup - Maven requires Java 5+ : Remove unnecessary boxing Not sure that's a good idea. I've found quite a few bugs related to boxing in other projects. For example, auto-unboxing a field that can sometimes be null may cause an

Re: [32/50] git commit: Code cleanup - Maven requires Java 5+ : Replace for and while loops by for each

On 15 July 2013 23:26, aherit...@apache.org wrote: Code cleanup - Maven requires Java 5+ : Replace for and while loops by for each Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/commit/d92746dc Tree:

Re: Next release for master

Commit Then Review On 16 July 2013 00:15, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 July 2013 08:39, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Remember folks, we are CTR not RTC so we shouldn't be holding up getting stuff done I think I should be able to grok that, but

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0

On 13 July 2013 14:54, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: The vote has passed with the following: +1 Binding: Arnaud, Stephen, Olivier, Hervé +1 Non-binding: Stevo, Anders, Tony, Tamas, Baptiste, Mark, Mirko I voted -1 (non-binding) because of the invalid NOTICE file (amongst other reasons).

  1   2   3   >