---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20080/
---
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Ian Downes, Niklas Nielsen, and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20080/#review39674
---
Is this RR really dependent on r19795, r18403? It seems to me that
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12365/#review39687
---
src/common/resources.cpp
On April 7, 2014, 4:26 p.m., Tobias Weingartner wrote:
src/common/resources.cpp, line 543
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12365/diff/3/?file=323798#file323798line543
This is comparison of:
double == 0
Which is likely somewhat ill defined. Thanks to:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20070/#review39695
---
Ship it!
src/usage/main.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20080/#review39696
---
src/slave/containerizer/mesos_containerizer.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18155/#review39702
---
Ship it!
I'll address the remaining formatting issues and get it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19835/#review39707
---
Ship it!
Good to see this!
- Ben Mahler
On March 31, 2014, 7:11
On March 20, 2014, 1:03 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
src/state/log.cpp, line 340
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19007/diff/1/?file=515951#file515951line340
This line is broken with the new const Option::get semantics!
Benjamin Hindman wrote:
That is nasty nasty nasty, looking
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20072/#review39712
---
Ship it!
Timothy St. Clair created MESOS-1195:
Summary: Systemd : cgroups fails on co-mounted subsystem
Key: MESOS-1195
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1195
Project: Mesos
Issue
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19702/
---
(Updated April 7, 2014, 6:25 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13962103#comment-13962103
]
Timothy St. Clair commented on MESOS-1195:
--
FWIW the logic fails in cgroups.cpp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13962107#comment-13962107
]
Nikita Vetoshkin commented on MESOS-1195:
-
Are you trying to make mesos manipulate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13962114#comment-13962114
]
Timothy St. Clair commented on MESOS-1195:
--
Correct, but the issue is due to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ian Downes updated MESOS-1195:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 0.19.0)
0.18.0
Systemd : cgroups fails on
I'm working on porting my executor from the CommandExecutor to a custom
executor, in order to take advantage of other features of Mesos. I started
by changing the TaskInfo in the scheduler to define ExecutorInfo instead of
CommandInfo, where the ExecutorInfo's command is the same as the original
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13962118#comment-13962118
]
Nikita Vetoshkin commented on MESOS-1195:
-
Is it a good idea? I mean doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13962123#comment-13962123
]
Timothy St. Clair commented on MESOS-1195:
--
It is not required, for some time, to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy St. Clair updated MESOS-1195:
-
Description:
When attempting to configure mesos to use systemd slices on a 'rawhide/f21'
Unfortunately you will need to learn this by looking at the code in
libprocess, as the message passing format is not explicitly documented at
the current time.
Start with calls like ProtobufProcess::send() and dig your way down.
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Vladimir Vivien
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13962124#comment-13962124
]
Nikita Vetoshkin commented on MESOS-1195:
-
I see, thanks!
Systemd : cgroups
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13962129#comment-13962129
]
Ian Downes commented on MESOS-1195:
---
The reasoning behind not supporting multiple
Jie recently pointed me to the Sparrow talk:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4k0WqjUY9A
In light of the concerns over the latency penalty of centralized scheduler
systems, it would be awesome to measure task / update / message latencies
when dealing with very large clusters. Does mesosaurus aim
Or, just to get to know - you can take tcpdump and take a look :)
I personally wouldn't call that HTTP. Something HTTP-like would describe
it better. Because it's not request-response. It's just message passing, no
need to wait for the answer - send new message one after another. Every
message is
See
https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Trunk-Ubuntu-Build-Out-Of-Src-Set-JAVA_HOME/2042/changes
It has been submitted. Please mark it as submitted.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Jie Yu yujie@gmail.com wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20055/
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jie Yu
On April 7th, 2014, 7:12 p.m. UTC, Chi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20026/
---
(Updated April 7, 2014, 8:23 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20026/#review39582
---
Please add some tests to exercise the new code path.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20097/
---
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone.
Bugs: MESOS-764
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13962246#comment-13962246
]
Adam B commented on MESOS-982:
--
Shouldn't we still be concerned about the network load on the
So, I don't need to notify about STARTING? But I should inform RUNNING,
FINISHED, and FAILED?
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Benjamin Mahler
benjamin.mah...@gmail.comwrote:
Why is your executor failing? When you say failing, is your executor
crashing or simply exiting after doing the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20026/#review39727
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [20026]
All tests passed.
-
Yes you should inform for RUNNING, FINISHED, FAILED.
If you have a non-trivial amount of work to perform to get the task into a
RUNNING state, you may want to also consider sending STARTING immediately
when you get the task:
E.g.:
receive task
send(STARTING)
do some work
task is now running
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13962279#comment-13962279
]
Benjamin Mahler edited comment on MESOS-982 at 4/7/14 9:25 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Mahler reopened MESOS-982:
---
[~adam-mesos] thanks for bringing that up, we should indeed be prudent and add
the retry logic
Hi Ritwik, please add 'mesos' to the 'Groups' field on the review as well,
this ensures it is sent out on the dev@ list.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Ritwik ritwik.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
+dev@mesos.apache.org
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ritwik Yadav
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19857/#review39731
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jiang Yan Xu
On April 7, 2014, 12:03 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20104/
---
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone.
Bugs: MESOS-764
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20106/
---
(Updated April 7, 2014, 9:45 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20097/#review39730
---
Ship it!
src/master/master.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19702/#review39716
---
configure.ac
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19702/#comment72329
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20106/#review39735
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [20106]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19702/#review39739
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [19981, 19982, 19702]
All
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20106/#review39742
---
Great! How about a test that demonstrates the flattening for TryT?
Looks like you already have it implemented as a Framework.
So, you just want it added to the list at
http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/mesos-frameworks/ ?
Easy enough. You can even make the change yourself and submit the patch:
On April 7, 2014, 11:23 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/future.hpp, lines 89-90
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20106/diff/1/?file=552187#file552187line89
Let's avoid doing ResultT for now since supporting an implicit
constructor requires template
Bhuvan Arumugam created MESOS-1196:
--
Summary: create annotated tag for v0.19.0
Key: MESOS-1196
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1196
Project: Mesos
Issue Type: Task
On April 7, 2014, 2:50 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
Is this RR really dependent on r19795, r18403? It seems to me that we could
land this independently (while the others are in flight).
I agree that this does not depend on 19795 or 18403, so let's remove those and
commit this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20104/#review39748
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [20104]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19795/
---
(Updated April 7, 2014, 4:53 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ian Downes and
On April 7, 2014, 11:33 a.m., Ian Downes wrote:
src/slave/slave.cpp, line 992
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19795/diff/3/?file=544927#file544927line992
I believe Vinod is saying the future argument to __runTask is the same
as the member variable executor-info. You can do any error
On April 2, 2014, 5:47 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
src/slave/slave.cpp, line 2299
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19795/diff/3/?file=544927#file544927line2299
Why is this returning a Future? Is this for future proofing (no pun
intended).
This is the future that executor-info is set to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20080/#review39749
---
src/slave/containerizer/mesos_containerizer.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20097/#review39751
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [19857, 20097]
All tests
Jie Yu created MESOS-1197:
-
Summary: Adding signal safe os::system
Key: MESOS-1197
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1197
Project: Mesos
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Jie Yu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jie Yu updated MESOS-1197:
--
Description:
There exist a few scenarios in which we need to execute a shell command inside
the child context
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19702/#review39752
---
src/linux/routing.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20055/#review39757
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [20055]
Failed command: git apply
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20025/#review39760
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [20025]
Failed command: make check
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13962522#comment-13962522
]
Jie Yu commented on MESOS-1197:
---
For ::system, the calling process ignoring SIGINT and
61 matches
Mail list logo
