On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:12 PM, qingyang li liqingyang1...@gmail.com
wrote:
'20140702-113428-1694607552-5050-17766-' failed to start: Failed to
fetch URIs for container 'af557235-2d5f-4062-aaf3-a747cb3cd0d1': exit
status 32512
looks like the mesos slave is unable to fetch the executor
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23214/#review47154
---
Did you consider:
hashmapContainerID, OptionInfo* infos
This is
See https://builds.apache.org/job/mesos-reviewbot/1061/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23224/#review47213
---
This seems to be missing the setup.py(.in)s from mesos.api,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23220/#review47214
---
Ship it!
Looks good. I assume that they have been run with many
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23221/#review47223
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [23214, 23221]
Failed command: make
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Kevin Lyda ke...@ie.suberic.net wrote:
What should I be hunting down here?
I tried clearing any previous state by removing /tmp/mesos,
/var/lib/mesos/replicated_log and by removing the /mesos tree in
zookeeper (delete /mesos/log_replicas and delete /mesos)
The
Friendly reminder and email bump:
Early-bird (US$99) registration for #MesosCon
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/mesoscon ends this Friday, at
which point it will raise to US$299.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Dave Lester daveles...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Early-bird (US$99)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23224/#review47228
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [23224]
Failed command: ./bootstrap
On July 2, 2014, 6:17 p.m., Brian Wickman wrote:
This seems to be missing the setup.py(.in)s from mesos.api, mesos.native,
mesos.protocol. Forget to git add?
Otherwise this is looking great!
Argh, how'd I miss those. Thanks!
- Thomas
Kevin,
How many masters did you start?
- Jie
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Kevin Lyda ke...@ie.suberic.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Kevin Lyda ke...@ie.suberic.net wrote:
What should I be hunting down here?
I tried clearing any previous state by removing /tmp/mesos,
Looks like there are only 2 masters:
I0702 20:21:20.772124 14260 network.hpp:461] ZooKeeper group PIDs: {
log-replica(1)@10.196.106.219:5050, log-replica(1)@10.196.106.221:5050 }
The replicated log cannot be initialized unless all the masters are
available.
- Jie
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:42
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23224/
---
(Updated July 2, 2014, 8:46 p.m.)
Review request for mesos.
Bugs: MESOS-857
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23220/#review47233
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [23220]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23224/#review47235
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [23224]
Failed command: make -j3
On June 26, 2014, 1:39 a.m., Adam B wrote:
include/mesos/mesos.proto, line 128
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22123/diff/1/?file=601126#file601126line128
Please add some documentation to the FrameworkInfo comment that
explains what a value of failover=true means and when it should
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23214/
---
(Updated July 2, 2014, 10:55 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ian Downes, Jie
On July 2, 2014, 5:43 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
Did you consider:
hashmapContainerID, OptionInfo* infos
This is explicit that we support containers that optionally have network
isolation. Then we can disambiguate so e.g., calling watch() or usage() for
a container that we know about
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23214/#review47211
---
src/tests/port_mapping_tests.cpp
See
https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Trunk-Ubuntu-Build-Out-Of-Src-Set-JAVA_HOME/2226/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23221/#review47242
---
this patch is now in https://reviews.apache.org/r/23214
- Chi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23250/#review47252
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [23250]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23246/#review47253
---
Ship it!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23246/#review47254
---
src/slave/containerizer/isolators/network/port_mapping.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23214/#review47246
---
src/slave/containerizer/isolators/network/port_mapping.cpp
On July 2, 2014, 11:22 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
src/slave/containerizer/isolators/network/port_mapping.cpp, line 1084
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23246/diff/2/?file=623104#file623104line1084
I don't follow why you need to bind mount the directory to itself?
Can't you do this:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22796/
---
(Updated July 2, 2014, 11:37 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and Niklas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23216/#review47220
---
src/examples/low_level_scheduler_pthread.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23224/
---
(Updated July 2, 2014, 11:53 p.m.)
Review request for mesos.
Bugs: MESOS-857
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23224/#review47259
---
thanks for doing this work. this will be a huge improvement going
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21277/#review47261
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Dominic Hamon
On May 9, 2014, 12:05 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23246/#review47262
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [23246]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23214/#review47258
---
src/slave/containerizer/isolators/network/port_mapping.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23246/#review47256
---
Throwing this out here: an even better goal is that within the
On July 3, 2014, 12:18 a.m., Chi Zhang wrote:
src/slave/containerizer/isolators/network/port_mapping.cpp, line 1071
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23246/diff/2/?file=623104#file623104line1071
is this sufficient to check BIND_MOUNT_ROOT is _self_ mounted?
a little update:
- only
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22796/#review47265
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [22796]
Failed command:
On July 3, 2014, 12:10 a.m., Brian Wickman wrote:
src/python/native/setup.py.in, line 29
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23224/diff/4/?file=623204#file623204line29
what's your philosophy on versioning here?
should we always require deps==version or just deps=major,major+1
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23250/#review47264
---
Ship it!
src/examples/load_generator_framework.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22796/
---
(Updated July 3, 2014, 12:42 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and Niklas
On July 3, 2014, 12:10 a.m., Brian Wickman wrote:
src/Makefile.am, line 137
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23224/diff/1/?file=622309#file622309line137
i would love to see all protos contained here, including messages
protos. this will allow for the development of a pure python
On July 3, 2014, 12:10 a.m., Brian Wickman wrote:
src/python/protocol/setup.py.in, line 27
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23224/diff/4/?file=623207#file623207line27
same here, to be conservative, might want protobuf=2.5.0,3
Good call.
On July 3, 2014, 12:10 a.m., Brian Wickman
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23224/
---
(Updated July 3, 2014, 12:46 a.m.)
Review request for mesos.
Bugs: MESOS-857
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22796/#review47273
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [22796]
All tests passed.
-
On June 23, 2014, 6:50 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
src/slave/slave.cpp, line 1185
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/diff/11/?file=612826#file612826line1185
Also, what about launching the tasks after updating resources in
registerExecutor()?
Yifan Gu wrote:
Sounds good,
On July 2, 2014, 11:38 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
src/examples/low_level_scheduler_pthread.cpp, line 119
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23216/diff/1/?file=622210#file622210line119
do we need to protect this via mutex? afaict, all the callbacks
(connected, detected and received) are
On June 23, 2014, 6:50 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
src/slave/slave.cpp, line 1185
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/diff/11/?file=612826#file612826line1185
Also, what about launching the tasks after updating resources in
registerExecutor()?
Yifan Gu wrote:
Sounds good,
46 matches
Mail list logo
