On July 22, 2014, 11:26 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
src/docker/docker.cpp, line 149
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23771/diff/1/?file=637643#file637643line149
Any specific reason why you use --net=host here? Should this be exposed
so bridge can be used too?
This will be addressed in
On July 22, 2014, 11:26 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
src/linux/cgroups.cpp, line 1902
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23771/diff/1/?file=637648#file637648line1902
Don't you mean memory?
I believe you're looking at a old revision? Ben's last commit changed this
already.
- Timothy
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23224/#review48480
---
Looks good Thomas, just a few cleanups and we'll get this
-master.WARNING:W0724 02:51:59.583686 26949 master.cpp:1769]
Ignoring launch tasks message for offer [
20140724-004359-3078776074-5050-26927-854 ] of framework
20140724-004359-3078776074-5050-26927- from
'2594d2b8-c859-44fc-b9c0-7ebead6740bd@10.0.2.15:56713' because it is
not from the registered framework
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23874/#review48662
---
You are right that it would be inconvenient if the caller still
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22796/#review48670
---
src/master/master.cpp
On July 24, 2014, 6:27 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
src/master/master.cpp, lines 3451-3457
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22796/diff/7/?file=634636#file634636line3451
I forgot to mention the bug here in my comment!
With using an offerTimeout function, you can properly get the
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1452 :)
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Ben Mahler benjamin.mah...@gmail.com
wrote:
On July 24, 2014, 6:27 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
src/master/master.cpp, lines 3451-3457
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23868/#review48685
---
Chatted with BenM.
We've been having this problem:
Hi All,
I wanted to revisit a previous thread
http://markmail.org/message/o3nlnihmwqtgsm7d where I suggested that we
add a section to the Mesos website to list companies that provide Mesos
services and development. At that time, we heard interest from:
* Grand Logic
* Mesosphere
* Big Data Open
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23874/#review48689
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jiang Yan Xu
On July 23, 2014, 7:55 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23867/#review48691
---
Ship it!
src/master/detector.cpp
On July 24, 2014, 3:53 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
Looks good Thomas, just a few cleanups and we'll get this committed!
Also, I still have a few questions regarding the naming/structure of the
modules. ;-)
In particular, if we didn't have a native component, would we still
On July 24, 2014, 3:53 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
Looks good Thomas, just a few cleanups and we'll get this committed!
Also, I still have a few questions regarding the naming/structure of the
modules. ;-)
In particular, if we didn't have a native component, would we still
Hi Xiuwen,
I am not in the loop on our RPM builds but know that Tim St. Clair is doing
this in context of Red Hat builds.
I have CC'ed the Mesos dev list so you can get more precise pointers and
help :-)
Cheers,
Niklas
On 24 July 2014 14:59, Xiuwen Yang kevinenj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On July 24, 2014, 3:53 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
src/Makefile.am, lines 939-941
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23224/diff/9/?file=625487#file625487line939
Weird indenting here? -1 space maybe?
No, these are all dep targets for make. Is there a better syntax for this?
On July
On July 22, 2014, 11:26 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
src/slave/containerizer/docker.hpp, line 50
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23771/diff/2/?file=638778#file638778line50
This can be private.
We actually want to maintain it open so we can inherit this class in tests. I
can leave a
On July 24, 2014, 10:08 p.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
src/master/constants.hpp, line 26
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23868/diff/2/?file=641173#file641173line26
What is this for?
MIN_MEM is a Bytes object.
- Ben
---
This is an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23911/
---
Review request for mesos.
Bugs: MESOS-947
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23911/#review48705
---
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/multihashmap.hpp
On July 25, 2014, 12:51 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/multihashmap.hpp, line 42
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23911/diff/1/?file=641620#file641620line42
Aren't there potentially multiple keys for a particular value?
i.e.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23912/
---
Review request for mesos.
Bugs: MESOS-947
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23912/
---
(Updated July 24, 2014, 6:01 p.m.)
Review request for mesos.
Changes
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23913/
---
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Niklas Nielsen.
Bugs:
On July 24, 2014, 5:51 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/multihashmap.hpp, line 42
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23911/diff/1/?file=641620#file641620line42
Aren't there potentially multiple keys for a particular value?
i.e.
25 matches
Mail list logo
