---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24177/
---
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Jie Yu.
Repository: mesos-git
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24178/
---
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Jie Yu.
Bugs: MESOS-1586
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24123/
---
(Updated July 31, 2014, 11:23 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
On July 30, 2014, 5:12 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
src/tests/zookeeper_tests.cpp, lines 202-205
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24123/diff/1/?file=646315#file646315line202
What's stopping it from being even lower?
Say, 100 milliseconds?
Ok so with 100 milliseconds I have seen
Hello!
I love seeing the number of committers, issues, and reviews grow! But so
too does the complexity of the project: who's working on what, what needs a
shepherd, what needs to get reviewed, etc.
To help, we've slowly been getting around to improving our use of JIRA.
Some of you are already
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23771/#review49328
---
src/tests/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23707/#review49331
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Adam B
On July 19, 2014, 1:49 a.m., Timothy
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23709/#review49332
---
Ship it!
LGTM
3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/http.hpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23710/#review49333
---
support/cpplint.patch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23771/#review49338
---
src/docker/docker.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23710/#review49349
---
support/cpplint.py
On Aug. 1, 2014, 11:53 a.m., Adam B wrote:
src/slave/slave.cpp, line 2429
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23771/diff/10/?file=647996#file647996line2429
Is this an existing non-docker-related bug in the slave code?
How about renaming 'future' to make it clear what the bool
- What problem are we trying to solve?
Currently, the python bindings group protobufs, stub implementations
and compiled code into a single python package that cannot be
distributed easily. This forces python projects using mesos to copy
protobufs around and forces a onerous dependency on anyone
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23771/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2014, 4:36 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23700/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2014, 10:54 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler,
On July 30, 2014, 11:18 a.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
Talked to Jie. This script looks for the newest (most recently started)
process in this session and this may sometimes be not what we want. If some
tests themselves fork subprocesses and depending on whether setsid() is
called what we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24123/#review49368
---
Ship it!
Are these tests faster given the split? I see this test
On Aug. 1, 2014, 11:15 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
Are these tests faster given the split? I see this test used to take 10
seconds to run.
yeah. 200 ms each because the wait is removed.
- Jiang Yan
---
This is an automatically
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23453/#review49373
---
@tim: can you test and confirm that this works with a prefix
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24128/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2014, 12:37 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24194/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2014, 8:05 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Jie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24194/
---
Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
Bugs: MESOS-1658
`pip install mesos.interface` now works =)
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Thomas Rampelberg tho...@saunter.org wrote:
- What problem are we trying to solve?
Currently, the python bindings group protobufs, stub implementations
and compiled code into a single python package that cannot be
Thomas,
Thank you for the heads-up. One question: what if mesos and python binding
have different versions? For example, is it ok to use a 0.19.0 python
binding and having a 0.20.0 mesos? Same question for the reverse.
- Jie
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Thomas Rampelberg tho...@saunter.org
See
https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Trunk-Ubuntu-Build-Out-Of-Src-Set-JAVA_HOME/2280/changes
Changes:
[benjamin.hindman] Refactored the python bindings into multiple modules.
--
[...truncated 3891 lines...]
[==] Running 145 tests from 29 test
See https://builds.apache.org/job/mesos-reviewbot/1263/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24178/#review49383
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [24177, 24178]
All tests
Woah, this is really awesome Thomas! Especially the pip install ;-)
Looking forward to bringing pesos up to speed with this.
On 1 August 2014 21:30, Jie Yu yujie@gmail.com wrote:
Thomas,
Thank you for the heads-up. One question: what if mesos and python binding
have different versions?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24197/
---
Review request for mesos and Ian Downes.
Summary (updated)
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24197/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2014, 11 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Ian Downes.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24128/#review49400
---
We probably wanna go with this patch for 0.20.0. See MESOS-1466 for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23771/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2014, 11:31 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman,
On Aug. 1, 2014, 4:30 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
src/master/master.cpp, line 3434
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24128/diff/4/?file=648800#file648800line3434
Could you please add an optional filer for 'resourcesRecovered'
(similar to that in 'resourcesUnused'), and use a default filter
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24128/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2014, 5:03 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman
See
https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Trunk-Ubuntu-Build-Out-Of-Src-Set-JAVA_HOME/2281/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23700/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2014, 6:55 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Mesos-Ubuntu-distcheck/246/changes
Changes:
[benjamin.hindman] Refactored the python bindings into multiple modules.
[yan] Fixed a flaky test: ZooKeeperTest.LeaderDetectorTimeoutHandling
--
[...truncated 4546 lines...]
37 matches
Mail list logo
