---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26861/#review57112
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [26610, 26861]
All tests
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26855/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 2:11 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Niklas Nielsen
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26862/#review57113
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [26610, 26861, 26862]
Failed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26862/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 6:53 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26855/#review57120
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [26855]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26767/#review57121
---
src/files/files.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26862/#review57122
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [26610, 26861, 26862]
All
added debug logs in a file to check,
and no file is created), but I see no error in master logs (console) nor
slave logs.
In master I can see:
I1017 16:50:30.601210 25794 master.cpp:3559] Sending 1 offers to
framework 20141017-141022-16777343-5050-25774-0047
I1017 16:50:30.608912 25789 master.cpp
On Oct. 10, 2014, 11:24 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
src/slave/slave.cpp, line 1413
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23912/diff/8/?file=716689#file716689line1413
It is weird to me that you remove the task here but (potentially)
remove the executor up in _runTask(). It's not obvious to me
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23912/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 9:25 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23912/#review57159
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [23912]
Failed command:
On Oct. 16, 2014, 1:44 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
src/examples/balloon_framework.cpp, line 134
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26382/diff/2/?file=723169#file723169line134
You say it's reason, but output message. Is it on purpose?
I changed the output from 'Reason' to 'Message'
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26382/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 10:07 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Vinod Kone and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26879/
---
Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
Bugs: MESOS-1858
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26879/#review57169
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Vinod Kone
On Oct. 17, 2014, 5:21 p.m., Jie
.
In master I can see:
I1017 16:50:30.601210 25794 master.cpp:3559] Sending 1 offers to
framework 20141017-141022-16777343-5050-25774-0047
I1017 16:50:30.608912 25789 master.cpp:2169] Processing reply for
offers: [ 20141017-141022-16777343-5050-25774-97 ] on slave
20141017-141022-16777343-5050-25774-0
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23912/#review57172
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Vinod Kone
On Oct. 17, 2014, 4:25 p.m.,
On Oct. 17, 2014, 5:39 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
Ship It!
I committed this after some minor fixes. Thanks Bernd!
- Vinod
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23912/#review57172
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26382/#review57176
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [26817, 26382]
All tests
On Oct. 7, 2014, 11:54 a.m., Jie Yu wrote:
src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp, lines 991-1002
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25861/diff/2/?file=711202#file711202line991
Can you use f.onAny here so that you don't need to change the signature
of `___destroy`?
Appears to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26846/#review57168
---
Looks great!
Main two comments from below are:
(1) Could we now
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26855/#review57166
---
src/tests/module_tests.hpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26783/#review57188
---
Hey Joris,
Can you file a JIRA ticket on the issue?
Also, do you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26797/#review57189
---
Are you sure this will work?
Try take a look at:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26699/#review57185
---
Looks good, mainly just comments about adding more comments for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26775/#review57192
---
Looks like you changed more than just loading flags (hoisting flags
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26855/#review57193
---
Mind referring to the JIRA ticket? :)
- Niklas Nielsen
On Oct.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26700/#review57198
---
Flying by.
src/slave/slave.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26817/#review57190
---
src/master/master.hpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26861/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 7:32 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26862/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 7:33 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26817/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 7:53 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26486/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 7:55 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26486/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 7:56 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26817/#review57202
---
Hm.. could you please split the code movement out into a separate
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26817/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 1:09 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and
On Oct. 17, 2014, 12:29 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
src/master/master.cpp, lines 2358-2361
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26817/diff/1/?file=723143#file723143line2358
We should only proceed with authorization if validations succeeded.
Otherwise there is no point.
Also, it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26862/#review57208
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [26610, 26861, 26862]
All
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26817/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 1:46 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26382/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 1:55 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Vinod Kone and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26766/#review57213
---
Hey Cody, just took a quick look at this, had a few high level
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26486/#review57218
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [26486]
All tests passed.
-
On Oct. 15, 2014, 10:47 p.m., Mesos ReviewBot wrote:
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [26736]
Failed command: git apply --index 26736.patch
Error:
error: patch failed: src/docker/docker.cpp:472
error: src/docker/docker.cpp: patch does not apply
error: patch failed:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26700/#review57219
---
Ship it!
src/messages/messages.proto
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26382/#review57226
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [26817, 26382]
Failed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26855/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 5:45 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Niklas Nielsen
On Oct. 15, 2014, 10:47 p.m., Mesos ReviewBot wrote:
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [26736]
Failed command: git apply --index 26736.patch
Error:
error: patch failed: src/docker/docker.cpp:472
error: src/docker/docker.cpp: patch does not apply
error: patch failed:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26736/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 9:55 p.m.)
Review request for mesos.
Changes
---
On Oct. 15, 2014, 10:47 p.m., Mesos ReviewBot wrote:
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [26736]
Failed command: git apply --index 26736.patch
Error:
error: patch failed: src/docker/docker.cpp:472
error: src/docker/docker.cpp: patch does not apply
error: patch failed:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26855/#review57234
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [26855]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26894/
---
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
Bugs: MESOS-1359
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26896/
---
Review request for mesos and Benjamin Hindman.
Repository: mesos-git
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26897/
---
Review request for mesos and Benjamin Hindman.
Repository: mesos-git
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26898/
---
Review request for mesos and Benjamin Hindman.
Repository: mesos-git
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26517/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 10:57 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26736/#review57237
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [26736]
Failed command:
On Oct. 17, 2014, 11:02 p.m., Mesos ReviewBot wrote:
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [26736]
Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 26736
Error:
--2014-10-17 23:02:08-- https://reviews.apache.org/r/26736/diff/raw/
Resolving reviews.apache.org (reviews.apache.org)...
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26436/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 11:24 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Benjamin
On Oct. 17, 2014, 11:02 p.m., Mesos ReviewBot wrote:
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [26736]
Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 26736
Error:
--2014-10-17 23:02:08-- https://reviews.apache.org/r/26736/diff/raw/
Resolving reviews.apache.org (reviews.apache.org)...
I updated this language and also added a few of the features Ben Mahler
mentioned; feedback welcome. http://mesos.apache.org
There is a lot to be desired for in terms of design; patches are welcome!
The website source for folks that do not already know is available here:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26894/#review57250
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [26894]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26214/
---
(Updated Oct. 18, 2014, 12:12 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26903/
---
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Niklas Nielsen.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26904/
---
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Niklas Nielsen.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26855/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 8:34 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26436/#review57257
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [26610, 26861, 26862, 26896,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26214/#review57258
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [24535, 24536]
Failed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26906/
---
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Niklas Nielsen.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26855/#review57260
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [26903, 26904, 26855]
All
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26906/#review57261
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [26903, 26904, 26855, 26906]
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26736/
---
(Updated Oct. 18, 2014, 3:51 a.m.)
Review request for mesos.
Changes
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26622/
---
(Updated Oct. 17, 2014, 11:40 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26736/#review57262
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [26736]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24536/
---
(Updated Oct. 18, 2014, 4:59 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and
On Oct. 15, 2014, 7:06 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
src/state/log.cpp, lines 364-369
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24536/diff/4/?file=719263#file719263line364
This appears to be incorrect:
Say we have 2 Snapshots:
A: (diff=0, position=11)
B: (diff=3, position=10)
75 matches
Mail list logo