I am newbie to MINA. I initially had implemented StreamIOHandler. It seems
that it is still SYNCHRONOUS and not NIO based. Is my understanding correct
? Does this mean that I lose all the benefits of MINA because of this
approach.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Implement
quicksilverm28 wrote:
I am newbie to MINA. I initially had implemented StreamIOHandler. It seems
that it is still SYNCHRONOUS and not NIO based. Is my understanding correct
? Does this mean that I lose all the benefits of MINA because of this
approach.
Well, you are using Java NIO under the h
I also see that if I just overload messageReceived and remove
StreamIOHaandler then I am getting partial bytes. Is there a workaround to
this issue ?
If there is no workaround, would it mean that streaming is impossible using
NIO ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Implem
Emmanuel Lecharny-3 wrote:
>
> While looking at the abstract class, I found some methods with this kind
> of code :
>
> public final WriteFuture write(Object message, SocketAddress
> remoteAddress) {
> if (message == null) {
> throw new NullPointerException("message");