Re : ConnectFuture confusion

2010-03-02 Thread Edouard De Oliveira
There are months i'm thinking the same without daring to say so ... The problem is that 1.x branches have been abandonned long time ago and much people are indeed waiting for the release of this 2.0 how bad would it be to release it for the early adopters with a 'use it at your own risk' warning

Re: [sshd] Output for errOut goes to stdOut

2010-03-02 Thread Bernd Fondermann
I resolved the issue in JIRA. Thanks Guillaume for looking into this. At least, the behavior is now documented. Bernd On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:20, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > Opened SSHD-76 with more info. > > Thanks, > >  Bernd > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 18:05, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> I'

Re: Re : ConnectFuture confusion

2010-03-02 Thread Victor
I agree with Edouard, much people not even waited but used (!) mina 2.0 in production. Our servers are working on mina 2.0 during ~1.5 years - we use both connectors and acceptors. In fact, 2.0 is not so bad as it seems to be ;) We just have some bugs which should be fixed in 2.0. Otherwise peop

Re: Re : ConnectFuture confusion

2010-03-02 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On 3/2/10 1:13 PM, Victor wrote: I agree with Edouard, much people not even waited but used (!) mina 2.0 in production. Our servers are working on mina 2.0 during ~1.5 years - we use both connectors and acceptors. In fact, 2.0 is not so bad as it seems to be ;) We just have some bugs which shou

Re: Re : ConnectFuture confusion

2010-03-02 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Ok, MINA 2.0 is far from being perfect, there are some issues, but so far, > it's usable. Agreed. I think not getting 2.0 out would be bikeshedding. I think we should release and support a 2.0 release, then put our main focus on 3.0 (rath

Re: Re : ConnectFuture confusion

2010-03-02 Thread Maarten Bosteels
I totally agree with Niklas. Maarten On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny > wrote: > > Ok, MINA 2.0 is far from being perfect, there are some issues, but so > far, > > it's usable. > > Agreed. I think not getting 2.0 out wo

Re: Re : ConnectFuture confusion

2010-03-02 Thread Bernd Fondermann
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 14:00, Maarten Bosteels wrote: > I totally agree with Niklas. +1 from the downstream gallery. Bernd > Maarten > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny >> wrote: >> > Ok, MINA 2.0 is far from bei