Hi all,
For the integration tests, using a client like Jakarta Commons
HttpClient would test the raw functionality, but I was thinking also
at some test framework like Selenium, What do you think of these kind
of tests?
Another question is: if Selenium is the way to go for integration
tests then
Hi,
I'm currently using the Apache MINA 2.0.0-RC1 build. The problem I am having
is receiving messages after sending data to a device serially. I have
verified that I should be receiving data through the use of other serial
utility programs as well as using Java's gnu.io.* library. The code is
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
yesterday, while checking the released packages, I found that the rxtx lib
was included into them. This is bad. We must get this lib out of our
packages.
Sorry for the late reply on this. Do we need to take any
keep user files on ftp server always encrypted
--
Key: FTPSERVER-380
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-380
Project: FtpServer
Issue Type: New Feature
Environment:
On 7/14/10 10:29 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote:
yesterday, while checking the released packages, I found that the rxtx lib
was included into them. This is bad. We must get this lib out of our
packages.
Sorry for the
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
elecha...@apache.org wrote:
We may need to regenerate all of them, but it's really painful.
Do we know how far back it is included?
/niklas
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
elecha...@apache.org wrote:
We may need to regenerate all of them, but it's really painful.
Do we know how far back it is included?
Checked it myself, affected
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
elecha...@apache.org wrote:
As the M4, M5..., RC1 are just intermediate milestones, I think we should
just produce a RC1 without the lib (because we might have a regression in
2.0), and remove the previous jars
So, remove the JAR for the RC1
Hi
We're up for a board report in July. Here's a draft of the report,
please comment!
/niklas
=
Releases
No releases has been made since the last board report.
Community
-
* No new committers or changes to the PMC since the last report
* The
On 7/14/10 10:57 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
elecha...@apache.org wrote:
As the M4, M5..., RC1 are just intermediate milestones, I think we should
just produce a RC1 without the lib (because we might have a regression in
2.0), and remove
On 7/14/10 11:07 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
Hi
We're up for a board report in July. Here's a draft of the report,
please comment!
/niklas
=
Releases
No releases has been made since the last board report.
Community
-
* No new committers or
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
elecha...@apache.org wrote:
Well, we can launch a vote, sure, but it should remain RC1, IMO.
Cool, I'll create some clean packages tomorrow and open a vote
unless someone beats me to it.
/niklas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Niklas Gustavsson closed FTPSERVER-380.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Please ask questions like this on the mailing list at
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Bogdan Ciprian Pistol
bogdancipr...@gmail.com wrote:
For the integration tests, using a client like Jakarta Commons
HttpClient would test the raw functionality, but I was thinking also
at some test framework like Selenium, What do you think of these kind
of
14 matches
Mail list logo