Re: [MINA 3] Performances

2013-01-05 Thread Julien Vermillard
Houura :-) The default socket buffer size is changed by mina 2 ? Le 5 janv. 2013 06:26, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit : Some more results after the modification I suggest at the end of my last mail (ie, do the write immediately, instead of using a queue, when we can) : Mina3

Re: [MINA 3] Performances

2013-01-05 Thread Jeff MAURY
Regarding the message size, I noticed that Mina2 writes only a sub part of the message (size is computed from the receive buffer size if I remember correctly) whereas Netty tries to write the buffer buffer to the socket. So If you did the same in Mina3, it may explain why it is slow Jeff On

Re: [MINA 3] Performances

2013-01-05 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 1/5/13 1:27 PM, Jeff MAURY a écrit : Regarding the message size, I noticed that Mina2 writes only a sub part of the message Do you mean the full message don't get written ? I would be extremely surprised if it were the case, and it would worth a JIRA and a fix... (size is computed from

Re: [MINA 3] Performances

2013-01-05 Thread Jeff MAURY
No, I did not mean there's a bug but what I meant is that when Mina2 has to write a large message, it will split the message in small parts when writing to the socket whereas Netty tries to write the full message to the socket (as Mina3 from what you said). This may explain why Netty becomes

Re: [MINA 3] Performances

2013-01-05 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 1/5/13 7:21 PM, Jeff MAURY a écrit : No, I did not mean there's a bug but what I meant is that when Mina2 has to write a large message, it will split the message in small parts when writing to the socket whereas Netty tries to write the full message to the socket (as Mina3 from what you

Re: [MINA 3] Performances

2013-01-05 Thread Jeff MAURY
I'm working on the netty server. It should be ok by the end of the week-end. Regarding the performance for large message, should'nt it be related to jni i mean the conversion from the java bytebuffer to a memory array that is expected by the os socket layer ? Jeff Le 5 janv. 2013 19:42, Emmanuel

Re: [MINA 3] Performances

2013-01-05 Thread Julien Vermillard
perhaps we should try reading/writing direct buffers On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Jeff MAURY jeffma...@gmail.com wrote: I'm working on the netty server. It should be ok by the end of the week-end. Regarding the performance for large message, should'nt it be related to jni i mean the