Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2

2008-07-08 Thread Julien Vermillard
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:30:59 +0200 Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment for releasing 2.0M2. Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one still OPEN :

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2

2008-07-08 Thread Julien Vermillard
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:30:59 +0200 Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment for releasing 2.0M2. Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one still OPEN :

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2

2008-07-08 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
Julien Vermillard wrote: On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:30:59 +0200 Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment for releasing 2.0M2. Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one still OPEN :

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2

2008-07-08 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
The release is done, now I wait for mirror to update, I placed the tarballs here temporary, if you want to check signature files : http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/2.0.0-M2/ Julien Thanks, Julien ! -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2

2008-07-08 Thread Julien Vermillard
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:14:37 +0200 Niklas Gustavsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The release is done, now I wait for mirror to update, I placed the tarballs here temporary, if you want to check signature files :

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2

2008-06-30 Thread Julien Vermillard
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:47:53 +0200 Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, very true, the problem is for producing all the artifact, actually it's a few hours (last time it

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2

2008-06-28 Thread Mike Heath
Julien Vermillard wrote: Hi, After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment for releasing 2.0M2. Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one still OPEN :

[VOTE] Release 2.0.M2

2008-06-27 Thread Julien Vermillard
Hi, After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment for releasing 2.0M2. Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one still OPEN : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel This release is not

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2

2008-06-27 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
[X]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M2 -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2

2008-06-27 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ha yep sorry, Revision 67224 Would it be possible to have binaries as well? Yeah, I know we're really only releasing source code but it would feel better to be able to review the real binaries before they go out. We

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2

2008-06-27 Thread Julien Vermillard
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:10:14 +0200 Niklas Gustavsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ha yep sorry, Revision 67224 Would it be possible to have binaries as well? Yeah, I know we're really only releasing source code

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2

2008-06-27 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it's helping to review the build process too :) Of course, but those options does not exclude each others :-) Anyway for the one who prefer binaries : http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT/

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2

2008-06-27 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
Anyway for the one who prefer binaries : http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT/ I'm feeling incredibly annoying today, Being annoying in this business sounds like being professional :) Some may find that being bureaucratic, but I think they simply don't understand what

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2

2008-06-27 Thread Julien Vermillard
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:46:58 +0200 Niklas Gustavsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it's helping to review the build process too :) Of course, but those options does not exclude each others :-) Anyway for the

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2

2008-06-27 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, very true, the problem is for producing all the artifact, actually it's a few hours (last time it took me half a day) for generate and verify everything (signature files, reports, binaries, etc..). Yeah, it's a

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2

2008-06-27 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would suggest we update the following page : http://mina.apache.org/developer-guide.html#DeveloperGuide-ReleasingaPointRelease(CommittersOnly) with the proposed steps to get a release ready for review, before the

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2

2008-06-27 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, very true, the problem is for producing all the artifact, actually it's a few hours (last time it took me half a day) for generate and verify everything (signature files, reports,

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2

2008-06-27 Thread Mark Webb
[ X]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M1 On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment for releasing 2.0M2. Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one still OPEN :