[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12715024#action_12715024
]
Niklas Gustavsson commented on FTPSERVER-287:
-
I've worked some on this and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12715317#action_12715317
]
Dennis Keller commented on FTPSERVER-287:
-
Hi Niklas - I suppose my comment woul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12716209#action_12716209
]
David Latorre commented on FTPSERVER-287:
-
Comments by Sai in the mailing list:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12716210#action_12716210
]
David Latorre commented on FTPSERVER-287:
-
By Niklas Gustavsson:
One addition
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12716251#action_12716251
]
David Latorre commented on FTPSERVER-287:
-
By the way, PureFTPD and vsFTPD in L
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12716384#action_12716384
]
Dennis Keller commented on FTPSERVER-287:
-
Interesting discussion. Thanks to all
I had a look and I'm inclined to think that the request is we
return the full pathname :-)
2009/6/1 Niklas Gustavsson (JIRA) :
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12715024#action
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:56 AM, David Latorre wrote:
> I had a look and I'm inclined to think that the request is we
> return the full pathname :-)
Let's compare with some other major servers and see what they do.
/niklas
I would like to say that the results you have indicated only come from FTP
servers that actually run the UNIX's ls command when a NLST command is
received. Other servers probably adhere to the RFC by just returning names.
Here are a few tests I did with various FTP servers:
Results from Netscape'
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Sai Pullabhotla
wrote:
> I would like to say that the results you have indicated only come from FTP
> servers that actually run the UNIX's ls command when a NLST command is
> received. Other servers probably adhere to the RFC by just returning names.
One addition t
In any case, what if we give an option for running a native command when
NLST or LIST command is received. So, the user could configure the FTP
server to execute the ls command and we redirect the output of the ls
command back to the client. One of the advantages of allowing this for the
LIST comma
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Sai Pullabhotla
wrote:
> In any case, what if we give an option for running a native command when
> NLST or LIST command is received. So, the user could configure the FTP
> server to execute the ls command and we redirect the output of the ls
> command back to the
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Sai Pullabhotla
> wrote:
>> I would like to say that the results you have indicated only come from FTP
>> servers that actually run the UNIX's ls command when a NLST command is
>> received. Other servers pr
I don't feel very comfortable with the idea of running ls (although
I'm executing several ln -s and I'm fine with it :P) for the output,
although users can reimplement any command they like ... :-) but it
doesn't look that useful, having into account that file permissions
won't be applicable when u
14 matches
Mail list logo
