* MINA 2.2.3 +1
* MINA 2.1.8 +1
* MINA 2.0.25 +1
Thanks
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Lecharny
Sent: 07 September 2023 05:30
To: dev@mina.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache MINA 2.2.3, 2.1.8 and 2.0.25 releases
hi!
WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
This is a vote for a tri
Non-binding +1 for all three. Tested each src zip file with 'mvn clear
verify' using:
Apache Maven 3.9.4 (dfbb324ad4a7c8fb0bf182e6d91b0ae20e3d2dd9)
Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.9.4/libexec
Java version: 1.8.0_382, vendor: Homebrew, runtime:
/usr/local/Cellar/openjdk@8/1.8.0-382_1/libexec/
+1
Jeff
> On Sep 6, 2023, at 9:29 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
> hi!
>
> WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
>
>
> This is a vote for a triple release:
> * MINA 2.2.3
> * MINA 2.1.8
> * MINA 2.0.25
>
> Those versions are fixing a Datagram session bug:
> DIRMINA-996:IoSessionRecycler Remo
+1
Le jeu. 7 sept. 2023 à 05:30, Emmanuel Lecharny a
écrit :
> hi!
>
> WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
>
>
> This is a vote for a triple release:
> * MINA 2.2.3
> * MINA 2.1.8
> * MINA 2.0.25
>
> Those versions are fixing a Datagram session bug:
> DIRMINA-996:IoSessionRecycler RemoteAddress
+1.
2 remarks:
- Does not build with Java 17
- Build is failing on Windows
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 8:11 AM Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> +1
>
> Le jeu. 7 sept. 2023 à 05:30, Emmanuel Lecharny a
> écrit :
>
> > hi!
> >
> > WARNING: there are 3 votes to cast!
> >
> >
> > This is a vote for a
I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:
[INFO] ---
[INFO] T E S T S
[INFO] ---
[INFO] Running org.apache.mina.core.buffer.IoBufferHexDumperTest
[INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors:
Thanks Jeff & Gary.
Is that for all the MINA versions?
On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
I can confirm a failure on Java 17 and Windows:
[INFO] ---
[INFO] T E S T S
[INFO] ---
[IN
Never mind, got the same error.
In Java 17 a call to CharsetEncoder.encode() on an immutable buffer
throws a CoderMalfunctionError, not a ReadOnlyBufferException.
The test has to be changed to reflect that. It does not change a thing
for the release, it's still good to go.
Thanks!
On 11/09
I only tested 2.2.3 RC 1 on Windows with Java 17. My other test runs where
on macOS with Java 8.
Gary
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 4:29 AM Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Thanks Jeff & Gary.
>
> Is that for all the MINA versions?
>
> On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> > I can confirm a failure o
I don’t remember if I voted because I have been voting on a lot of stuff lately.
If I didn’t here is my +1 for all 3.
Jeff
> On Sep 12, 2023, at 2:29 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Thanks Jeff & Gary.
>
> Is that for all the MINA versions?
>
> On 11/09/2023 16:27, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>>
Ok… I guess I was late :-)
Sorry!
Jeff
> On Sep 12, 2023, at 7:55 AM, jgenen...@apache.org wrote:
>
> I don’t remember if I voted because I have been voting on a lot of stuff
> lately.
>
> If I didn’t here is my +1 for all 3.
>
> Jeff
>
>> On Sep 12, 2023, at 2:29 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wr
You don't remember if you downloaded, built and reviewed all three src or
tar files? Are you voting without reviewing?
Gary
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 9:55 AM wrote:
> I don’t remember if I voted because I have been voting on a lot of stuff
> lately.
>
> If I didn’t here is my +1 for all 3.
>
> Jef
I don’t use Windows.
Jeff
> On Sep 12, 2023, at 10:11 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> You don't remember if you downloaded, built and reviewed all three src or
> tar files? Are you voting without reviewing?
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 9:55 AM wrote:
>
>> I don’t remember if I voted b
I don't understand what Windows has to do with my question.
What did you do to validate the release candidate before voting +1?
Gary
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 4:11 PM wrote:
> I don’t use Windows.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> > On Sep 12, 2023, at 10:11 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > You don't remember if y
Hi!
Not sure it's about validating how others are validating a release...
Now, I'd like to remind every PMC members that in order to issue a +1,
the following things has to be completed per [1]:
"Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download
all signed source code pac
Ok… say… answer coming off list… too much drama for dev@.
Jeff
> On Sep 12, 2023, at 5:20 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Not sure it's about validating how others are validating a release...
>
> Now, I'd like to remind every PMC members that in order to issue a +1, the
> following
Cutting the drama off, I think an explaination on what a release mean is
important.
Because this is what we do at The ASF: we release softwares that is to
be trusted by the world. And that requires some due diligenc:
"After such a vote, it is a formal offering of the ASF, backed by the
full
17 matches
Mail list logo
